Mueller speaks at 11 am today

[Truth Detector]

Future prosecutors and Congress should be paying attention.

NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

 

[Superfreak]

Show me that quote. You cant.

"he investigation did not
establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian
government in its election interference activities"

 

[Jack]

Best thing about this is it's MORE PRESSURE on Pelosi to impeach!! time to get going!

I agree. Pelosi CAN'T ignore this, no matter what the political cost.

 

[Truth Detector]

Swampy Don exercised executive privilege.

When? NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

 

[volsrock]

BAM BAM BAM!

Wasn't his job to exonerate , it was his job to find ENOUGH evidence and he didn't!

BAM BAM BAM!

 

[Truth Detector]

Got to admit I was wrong,

First honest post I have seen from you. You get EVERYTHING wrong snowflake. You haven't been right once.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

he didn't say that either, but he IMPLIED that for those who want to believe it.

he was a farce

Interesting enough, that bastion of liberal thought -- The Wall Street Journal -- does not agree with your assessment.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/mueller-to-make-first-public-comment-on-russia-probe-11559137275

 

[domer76]

poor JPP lefties seem very sad this morning

Hardly.

He clearly said that Trump was not exonerated from anything. Including conspiracy. And that Trump was not charged with a crime because Mueller was unable to do so.

 

[Jarod]

"he investigation did not
establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian
government in its election interference activities"

That is different than your claim...

 

[Superfreak]

Show me that quote. You cant.

"The investigation did not identify evidence that any US. persons conspired or coordinated with the
IRA."

 

[Truth Detector]

I would have told you if I found he was not guilty.
I was not allowed to indict him.

Guilty of what? Indict him for what? FLAIL much?

NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

 

[Jarod]

I think we will see impeachment in the House before the end of the year.

 

[Superfreak]

That is different than your claim...

LMAO... No it isn't moron. It is one of several statements that show there wasn't.

You on the other hand insist the report shows plenty of evidence of collusion. Please quote the portion(s) of the report that support your claim.

" the evidencewas not suffcient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with
representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election."

 

[volsrock]

Hardly.

He clearly said that Trump was not exonerated from anything. Including conspiracy. And that Trump was not charged with a crime because Mueller was unable to do so.

Wasn't his job to exonerate

 

[Jarod]

Wasn't his job to exonerate

no

 

[domer76]

when there is insufficient evidence then the person being investigated is INNOCENT

Innocent until proven guilty unless of course you are a republican and it is a democrat accusing you

Wrong dumbfuck. Insufficient evidence does not mean innocent, no matter how many times you repeat it.

 

[Truth Detector]

This is what he said:

“If we had confidence the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not.”

Which could be re-typed more honestly as "if he had evidence a crime had been committed, we would have said so. We did not."

“Charging the President with a crime was not an option we could consider.”
Due to DOJ policy

Which could be retyped as "We only gather evidence of a crime, which we found none; it is the AG's responsibility to charge and indict.

Constitutionally. Nobody from DOJ could. That’s the job of Congress.

Congress's job is to extract their collective heads from their arseholes and do something about Border security and the massive debt Obama ran up.

“There was insufficient evidence to charge the Trump campaign with conspiracy” He didn’t say there was no collusion.

What part of Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities. do you morons on the left continue to struggle with?

So, Trump and his campaign were not exonerated from anything

He doesn't need to be exonerated because he hasn't been charged or proven guilty of anything you dumb, ignorant fuck.

Delusional moron.

Yes, you most certainly are. Not to mention a repugnant piece of human excrement who wastes perfectly good oxygen.

 

[Truth Detector]

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha --->Truth Detector shitting in his pants<--- LOVE IT!!!

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha --->JackOff acting like an idiot<--- LOVE IT!!!

 

[domer76]

If it was long standing principle that indicting a President was unconstitutional then the Special Counsel was a complete waste of time as the House and Senate were already investigating.

Muller is a swamp creature

Nope, sure not, dumbfuck. They gave a roadmap to Congress to do their job.

 

[Truth Detector]

Different than your claim.

Not at all; why do you lie all of the time?