NBC is reporting today that all of Muellers questions to Trump dealt with Russian collusion.....doesn't that spell the end to lib'ruls dreams of an indictment of money laundering?......
It could mean already has money laundering tied up.
NBC is reporting today that all of Muellers questions to Trump dealt with Russian collusion.....doesn't that spell the end to lib'ruls dreams of an indictment of money laundering?......
So doesn't that mean Trump is the honest player here?
That's exactly what it means,
Early on Mueller new there was no collusion in the sense of the word he was looking for between Trump and the "Russians".
So rather than say so, for reasons as unethical as it gets, he and his band of merry men decide to develop this scheme you are seeing unfold.
let's trick this guy into saying this, and get that guy to say that, we can put this guy away for lying about this guy, and that guy away for conspiring with this guy to say that guy said this.
Everyone that has been indicted so far is for technically saying he didn't know something, that some other guy is saying he did know.
The only people left out of being prosecuted is, get this, THE RUSSIANS that Mueller indicted.
Manafort will get a life prison sentence that in liberal world another liberal would have gotten a suspended sentence.
you'd think someone, maybe an adult in the room would have said, "weren't we supposed to be looking for "collusion" between trump and the Russians"
And the real Irony is Hillary actually is on record being involved in PAYING Russia for false information on Trumps team to illegally obtain a FISA warrant to spy on a presidential candidate . WTF
never mind her deleting emails that she was ordered to turn over to authorities, there's your obstruction of justice, ya think?
As long as he told the truth, Trump has nothing to worry about.
That is why he is so worried about it.
It could mean already has money laundering tied up.
Trump seems very scared about the Russia investigation this morning.
look, name calling aside, liberal vs Trump, etc.
If you want to have a serious conversation I'm in.
and this is a serious question, does the whole method of this "investigation" not trouble you a little.
the way it's playing out, you know in the end it is just a lot of he said she said
And ignoring the DNC Russian connection, the monies paid for fake dirt on Trump associates to obtain federal warrants?
It could mean already has money laundering tied up.
If true someone is in trouble
look, name calling aside, liberal vs Trump, etc.
If you want to have a serious conversation I'm in.
and this is a serious question, does the whole method of this "investigation" not trouble you a little.
the way it's playing out, you know in the end it is just a lot of he said she said
And ignoring the DNC Russian connection, the monies paid for fake dirt on Trump associates to obtain federal warrants?
Does he? How do? You are an online emotional expert now?
NBC is reporting today that all of Muellers questions to Trump dealt with Russian collusion.....doesn't that spell the end to lib'ruls dreams of an indictment of money laundering?......
I do not see anything unusual about this federal investigation, do you? If so what is unusual about it?
Well, for one, Mueller has yet to indict ANYONE for an actual crime that occurred during the election. All he has indicted or prosecuted have been things that occurred a decade before the election (Manafort) or during the course of his investigation (lying to the FBI).
Now, I am not saying that lying to the FBI is a good thing, but it isn't exactly hard to get someone to lie to the FBI if you set them up. You say something happened in February and it actually happened in March. Guess what? You just lied tot eh FBI.
So yeah, I would say that is very unusual. Unless of course it is normal for investigators to investigate a crime but never prosecute that crime but only get "process" crimes.
Like I said, I don't expect you to ever admit it. You are too much of a partisan hack. But, I am 1000% confident that if the roles were reversed you would be screaming bloody murder. That is how you roll hypocrite
Mueller went along with Manaforts lies and pretended to believe them until after Trump provided his sworn testimony.
Then, Mueller pounced and called Manafort out on his lies.
Let’s see if Trump was dumb enough to believe what Manafort was selling.
Well, for one, Mueller has yet to indict ANYONE for an actual crime that occurred during the election. All he has indicted or prosecuted have been things that occurred a decade before the election (Manafort) or during the course of his investigation (lying to the FBI).
Now, I am not saying that lying to the FBI is a good thing, but it isn't exactly hard to get someone to lie to the FBI if you set them up. You say something happened in February and it actually happened in March. Guess what? You just lied tot eh FBI.
So yeah, I would say that is very unusual. Unless of course it is normal for investigators to investigate a crime but never prosecute that crime but only get "process" crimes.
Like I said, I don't expect you to ever admit it. You are too much of a partisan hack. But, I am 1000% confident that if the roles were reversed you would be screaming bloody murder. That is how you roll hypocrite