MUELLER invest'g SUITCASES/DUFFELs full of CASH from Russia & Putin to Trump campaign

so if the Starr probe was bogus, and it was -why don't you say the same for the Mueller probe? ( it is)

You really do not know the difference? really? Starr started with an absolutely bogus Whitewater crapola and went back through Hillary and Bills paper routes and lemonade stands. There was no continuity with Starr because they had nothing. They had nothing to build on. They wound up with a sex scandal. How would Trump fare if they went there?

But Mueller is dredging through Trump/Right wing crimes. So far 5 people charged or took pleas.How many did in Starr? Mueller is building a real case. They are nothing alike.
 
Are saying my statement is not true?

Moot. The answer is unknown until Mueller presents it. You guys are unable to discern the difference between proof not presented yet and proof that does not exist. Claiming that it does not exist is simply not possible to say.
 
You really do not know the difference? really? Starr started with an absolutely bogus Whitewater crapola and went back through Hillary and Bills paper routes and lemonade stands. There was no continuity with Starr because they had nothing. They had nothing to build on. They wound up with a sex scandal. How would Trump fare if they went there?

But Mueller is dredging through Trump/Right wing crimes. So far 5 people charged or took pleas.How many did in Starr? Mueller is building a real case. They are nothing alike.
none of those convictions had anything to do with Trump..same thing. they might wind up with obstructionism..
the call for investigating Russian collusion was crap.
 
Moot. The answer is unknown until Mueller presents it. You guys are unable to discern the difference between proof not presented yet and proof that does not exist. Claiming that it does not exist is simply not possible to say.

You obviously don't understand the difference between evidence and proof.

I said evidence, I didn't say proof.
 
outstanding posts countryboy.. very well said.

Trump is not a target of the investigation. Rosenstein extended the authorization to include Manafort's activities way back when he was a lobbyist for the Ukraine's "Party of Regions"..more FBI shenanigans.

I'm pretty sure Brennan shopped the steele dossier around as well..and he knew it was unverified.
But I don't want to say anything more that detracts form your posts..well said again

How does one get their head that far up ones ass? He is a subject. Which could turn to a target at any point. Many around him are TARGETS.
 
I think it is safe to say that PUTIN WANTED TRUMP TO WIN! Follow the money! Note the very last sentence. There has never been an accounting of TRUMP'S MASSIVE inauguration fund. They've refused. Hey RACHEL (Maddow), WHERE ARE YOU?? She's been mentioning this periodically for months.

Either way, their story suggests that one way Russia might have injected money into the
American political system for the 2016 election and beyond was not via traceable and accountable electronic transfers, but
the old-fashioned delivery of cold, hard cash.

Flying around stacks of cash is a time-honored way to get money into circulation in a distant place with no one in between learning about it — most of the time.

If Russian officials were shipping cash to the United States in 2016 for deposit in American bank accounts, which were then the apparently legitimate points of origination
for payments to political campaigns or political action committees, it could have been a powerful and deniable source of influence.


The Russia Investigations: On The Hunt For Duffel Bags Full Of Cash
April 7, 20187:00 AM ET
PHILIP EWING

Investigations: Mueller sends the feds to meet some international arrivees; new sanctions on some powerful, wealthy Russians; and Mr. Zuckerberg goes to Washington. A gleaming new Gulfstream 650 — or maybe it's a Sukhoi business jet — sweeps in for a landing at Teterboro Airport, the suburban New Jersey entrepôt for elite fliers on their way to nearby Manhattan. The sleek aircraft turns smartly off the runway and heads for the "executive passenger terminal," where a row of black vehicles is parked and waiting as usual. But when the hatch folds down to permit passengers to deplane and make their short drive into New York, someone is standing in the way:

That, at least, was the scene painted in an exclusive report by CNN's Kara Scannell and Shimon Prokupecz. Mueller himself might not be standing on the tarmac, but FBI investigators from his office have interdicted at least two wealthy Russians recently on their way into the United States, they report.
Article continues after sponsorship

The special counsel's office is apparently trying to establish whether powerful Russians who owe fealty to President Vladimir Putin — the oft-referenced "oligarchs" —may have funneled cash donations to President Trump's campaign or his inauguration fund.


The Russia Sanctions Saga: Weapons Dealers, Mobsters And Suitcases Full Of Cash

On Friday, the Treasury Department targeted some of those same oligarchs for a new round of sanctions, along with a number of other Russian government officials and entities — including the state weapons exporter. And here was the description Treasury gave of the conduct of one targeted Russian, gold baron Suleiman Kerimov:

"He is alleged to have brought hundreds of millions of euros into France – transporting as much as 20 million Euros at a time in suitcases, in addition to conducting more conventional funds transfers – without reporting the money to French tax authorities.

More money, more problems

That pattern of conduct, and the nature of the interdictions described by Scannell and Prokupecz, raise questions about how long this smuggling of cash might have gone on. The CNN story suggests investigators want to know whether it might have gone into Trump's inauguration accounts — or whether it continues to this day....

https://www.npr.org/2018/04/07/6002...ions-on-the-hunt-for-duffel-bags-full-of-cash


PS 20,000,000 Euros = $24,597,000.00 (US Dollars). That's a whole lot of suitcases and duffel bags!


Trump will be out of the White House by Labor Day. Book it. Period. End of story.
 
none of those convictions had anything to do with Trump..same thing. they might wind up with obstructionism..
the call for investigating Russian collusion was crap.

They had everything to do with the Trump administration. Do you think Trump has nothing to do with his own administration? Just some random crooks who are employed by Trumpies, but have no connection to trump himself.

fact is collusion was originally thought as unlikely, but is more and more possible every day. So many connection are arising.
 
They had everything to do with the Trump administration. Do you think Trump has nothing to do with his own administration? Just some random crooks who are employed by Trumpies, but have no connection to trump himself.

fact is collusion was originally thought as unlikely, but is more and more possible every day. So many connection are arising.
Collusion is bullshit. Cling to that attachment as long as you like -but it's bullshit.
I said this from day 1.

Mueller said Trump is not a target of an investigation; that means Mueller is not intending to file criminal charges at Trump for now.

Mueller is a weasel, who can bring back obstructionism,but even that is a process crime.

The charges against the others are also process crimes -no investigation = no crimes
 
Moot. The answer is unknown until Mueller presents it. You guys are unable to discern the difference between proof not presented yet and proof that does not exist. Claiming that it does not exist is simply not possible to say.

I can't and you can't but Watergate prosecutors can. FED attorneys can. Retired FED judges can. EX FBI agents can. Law professors can. Presidential historians can.
Retired and CURRENT Senator s and Congresspeople can.

All are weighing in.
 
You obviously don't understand the difference between evidence and proof.

I said evidence, I didn't say proof.

Evidence precedes proof. they obviously have both with at least 5 Trumpys so far. More to come. The fact that they confessed, is proof . the evidence Mueller has, is what made them confess. You' re quibbling again.
 
Collusion is bullshit. Cling to that attachment as long as you like -but it's bullshit.
I said this from day 1.

Right!

Collusion is bullshit.

Donald Trump is WAY too ethical to ever do something like that...even if it would mean he might win the presidency...or help him with loans that he needs.'

WAY TO ETHICAL. He would never do something like that.



images
 
so smuggling cash into France IMMEDIATELY brings to mind illegal foreign contribution to the Trump campaign?

I guess if you believe "Russian collusion" you'll believe anything :rolleyes:
Of course, Trump cultists are in full denial.:seenoevil::hearnoevil::palm:
 
Back
Top