MSNBC skewers hilary for "Straight up lying"

Hey, at least your honest. She can lie with impunity in your estimation.

They all lie with impunity, so if you require complete honesty from her, then you must require it of all of them. We use to do that in this country, but not anymore, so I give up. Honesty in a politician just doesn't matter anymore.

They can lie us into wars and no one cares, emails to me seem quite trivial.
 
They all lie with impunity, so if you require complete honesty from her, then you must require it of all of them. We use to do that in this country, but not anymore, so I give up. Honesty in a politician just doesn't matter anymore.

They can lie us into wars and no one cares, emails to me seem quite trivial.

National security is trivial? Since when?
 
Maybe you just don't understand tech enough to realize how serious a securtiy risk it is to have mail hosted on your own private server when you are secretary of state?

You don't care that your presidential candidate wants to hide information from the american people and make it difficult for things to be public record?

You don't care your presidential candidate feels the rules don't apply to her?

In the MSNBC segment (did you actually watch it?) they are saying she wouldn't be even able to be confirmed for attorney general at this point

This is not another benghazi rana. It IS a serious issue. If it wasn't a serious issue hillary clinton wouldn't have needed to lie about it and cover it up.

I didn't watch it, I really don't care what they say on Morning Joe, because for everyone who says this is a serious problem, you will find there are other who don't see it as a problem.

I just can't get overly excited about something in the past that didn't cause the nation any problems. She is no longer Sec of State, the policy has been clarified and she won't be convicted of a crime.

She has admitted it was a mistake, no laws were broken, to me it's over.
 
There was no breach. Lesson learned by the government once, again. They will now clarify how emails should be handled.

Russia’s Kremlin now has in their possession at least private 20,000 emails from Hillary Clinton’s poorly protected server, and they are debating if they should be released.

They stumbled onto these messages while monitoring Romanian computer hacker Lazăr Lehel, who is better known as “Guccifer.” They were watching him closely after he failed to hack into the internet network for Russia’s RT television network.

Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/...orst-news-emails-putin-smiling/#ixzz49nfgXHWs


The Associated Press reported in October 2015 that “Hillary Clinton’s private email server maintained in her home while serving as secretary of State was possibly hacked by Russia-tied authorities, and others, on five separate occasions.”

The AP report noted that investigators discovered among Clinton’s cache of released emails malicious software aimed at transmitting data to three overseas computers, including at least one in Russia. This malicious software was reportedly activated by clicking on it; but in October it was not clear if Clinton actually opened these messages or not, per the AP.
 
I didn't watch it, I really don't care what they say on Morning Joe, because for everyone who says this is a serious problem, you will find there are other who don't see it as a problem.

I just can't get overly excited about something in the past that didn't cause the nation any problems. She is no longer Sec of State, the policy has been clarified and she won't be convicted of a crime.

She has admitted it was a mistake, no laws were broken, to me it's over.

please watch the video. please.
 
Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/...orst-news-emails-putin-smiling/#ixzz49nfgXHWs


The Associated Press reported in October 2015 that “Hillary Clinton’s private email server maintained in her home while serving as secretary of State was possibly hacked by Russia-tied authorities, and others, on five separate occasions.”

The AP report noted that investigators discovered among Clinton’s cache of released emails malicious software aimed at transmitting data to three overseas computers, including at least one in Russia. This malicious software was reportedly activated by clicking on it; but in October it was not clear if Clinton actually opened these messages or not, per the AP.

[/quote]

Sorry, still don't see this on the level of other politicians lies and leading us into war, I will wait to see if this is true or not and I also look forward to Hillary's testimony to the FBI if that happens.

After Bush and Co got away, and the public didn't care, I don't see why this is such a big deal, sorry, I've just lost faith in our system making politicians accountable when guiltier people are walking around free, no consequences.
 
you clearly are ignorant of what is going on. You just above said there were no breaches, but it is very common knowledge at this point there were in fact breaches. Pay attention a bit more before outright dismissing things you clearly don't understand.
 
you clearly are ignorant of what is going on. You just above said there were no breaches but this is very common knowledge. Pay attention a bit more before outright dismissing things you clearly don't understand.
Whatever, I truly don't care about this, seriously and am surprised you care so much.
 
That articles two months old. New updated info came out yesterday right?
Did it on the hacking, it would seem if the FBI said the logs showed no evidence of being hacked that they would know, but I am computer illiterate and yiu know, I'm ignorant, too.

Did the FBI determine the acciunt was hacked or do you believe the Romsnian hacker?
 
They all lie with impunity, so if you require complete honesty from her, then you must require it of all of them. We use to do that in this country, but not anymore, so I give up. Honesty in a politician just doesn't matter anymore.

They can lie us into wars and no one cares, emails to me seem quite trivial.
well she's lied us into war with Libya too.
She's for arming up Syrian rebels -and when we tried it wit the CIA, they couldn't hold onto their weapons and many defected.

So what exactly does she have going for her ? She's arrogance of power -we see that with her misstatements on Emails, she's an innate interventionist.
She's a UNITARY type executive - already promising reliance on Executive Orders that surpass Obama. ( so called "post-Constitutionalist")
Her economic plans are globalist/corporatist -she was in favor of the TTP, until she wasn't..

The woman is disastrous. When I ask Hillary supporter why they support her; it's a deer in the headlite moment
 
Back
Top