MSNBC Climate Change Poll

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
As usual, you submit your opinion, supposition and conjecture as fact....which it is not.

Here's how I answered a similar stance from a mental compadre of yours. http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...29#post1481429

Trees cover roughly 9% of the earth and 30% of land. Development has taken some portion logging some as well but thats been replanted. Hey i like trees too but none of this addresses how temp fluxuations occurred in the middle ages when none of this was in play.



For starters, let me know when this replanting has replaced all the rain forest land razed in the last century, and then you might have an argument.

http://www.rainforestfoundationuk.org/Rainforest_facts
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
For starters, let me know when this replanting has replaced all the rain forest land razed in the last century, and then you might have an argument.

http://www.rainforestfoundationuk.org/Rainforest_facts


Let us know when you have killed off the population increase of the past century as well.

See folks, the Super Freaking Fool didn't even READ the information provided. Like all corporatist lackeys, he merely dodges the issue by trying to create some straw man to argue about. What an intellectual coward Super Freak is.
 
See folks, the Super Freaking Fool didn't even READ the information provided. Like all corporatist lackeys, he merely dodges the issue by trying to create some straw man to argue about. What an intellectual coward Super Freak is.

The point you retard is that there are a lot of things that are NOT going to go back to the way they were a century ago. Which is why YOU dodged his point with your bullshit about the rain forests getting back to where they were a century ago. But you are too ignorant to realize I simply did the same thing as you to prove a point.
 
what science classes do 'climatologists' take in addition to the meteorology classes?

Unlike American primitives they study the relevant subjects and their work is subject to peer-checking, whereas the denialist weirdoes study nothing except their masters lies, as everyone knows.
 
I'm at a point where I don't care if global warming is caused by humans or cow farts, I'm doing all I can to try and make processes and people live a more sustainable lifestyle. Self Driving cars will be the next big thing and it will dramatically decrease emissions, and entrepreneurs like Elon Musk are going to continue perfecting the battery used for electric vehicles. Within 5 years, everyone will have seen a self-driving vehicle on the road. Within 20 years, those self-driving vehicles will also be run on electric systems that don't necessarily need to generate power from the grid. It will be coming fast, so stop your bitchin' and start demanding that your law-makers get ready for the technology.
 
I'm at a point where I don't care if global warming is caused by humans or cow farts, I'm doing all I can to try and make processes and people live a more sustainable lifestyle. Self Driving cars will be the next big thing and it will dramatically decrease emissions, and entrepreneurs like Elon Musk are going to continue perfecting the battery used for electric vehicles. Within 5 years, everyone will have seen a self-driving vehicle on the road. Within 20 years, those self-driving vehicles will also be run on electric systems that don't necessarily need to generate power from the grid. It will be coming fast, so stop your bitchin' and start demanding that your law-makers get ready for the technology.

Yeah, and then soon we won't even need people anymore.
 
Unlike American primitives they study the relevant subjects and their work is subject to peer-checking, whereas the denialist weirdoes study nothing except their masters lies, as everyone knows.

LMAO... so in other words, you don't know?
 
Yeah, and then soon we won't even need people anymore.

Please elaborate, this doesn't make sense to me one bit. Only way we won't ever need people is if there are no people at all. We are becoming more interconnected than ever and somehow we won't need people? I'm confused about this statement and have no idea where your heading with it.
 
Please elaborate, this doesn't make sense to me one bit. Only way we won't ever need people is if there are no people at all. We are becoming more interconnected than ever and somehow we won't need people? I'm confused about this statement and have no idea where your heading with it.


I saw a TV show on self aware machines, AI. Machines will someday rule the Earth when it is no longer inhabitable for humans. It was interesting to imagine the possibilities.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
See folks, the Super Freaking Fool didn't even READ the information provided. Like all corporatist lackeys, he merely dodges the issue by trying to create some straw man to argue about. What an intellectual coward Super Freak is.
The point you retard is that there are a lot of things that are NOT going to go back to the way they were a century ago. Which is why YOU dodged his point with your bullshit about the rain forests getting back to where they were a century ago. But you are too ignorant to realize I simply did the same thing as you to prove a point.

Your "point" is just as retarded as your attempt to pass off your supposition and conjecture as FACT, when I presented TRUE FACTS that contradicted the assertion put forth by another poster

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...NBC-Climate-Change-Poll&p=1482040#post1482040

Had you actually READ the link, you would have noted that the CURRENT STATUS HAS NOT RECOVERED FROM THE DEVASTATION THAT BEGAN A CENTURY AGO....and thus the "replanting" is NOT "catching up". Trying to blow off the destruction of a vital link in the ecological soundness of the planet is about the dumbest thing you could try....but you Super Freaking never cease to amaze me in that respect.

Once again, you prove to be one Super Freaking corporate ass kissing fool.
 
Your "point" is just as retarded as your attempt to pass off your supposition and conjecture as FACT, when I presented TRUE FACTS that contradicted the assertion put forth by another poster

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...NBC-Climate-Change-Poll&p=1482040#post1482040

Had you actually READ the link, you would have noted that the CURRENT STATUS HAS NOT RECOVERED FROM THE DEVASTATION THAT BEGAN A CENTURY AGO....and thus the "replanting" is NOT "catching up". Trying to blow off the destruction of a vital link in the ecological soundness of the planet is about the dumbest thing you could try....but you Super Freaking never cease to amaze me in that respect.

Once again, you prove to be one Super Freaking corporate ass kissing fool.

LOL. Poor gullible thing. If the leftist trash told you we were being invaded by Martians you'd buy ut.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Your "point" is just as retarded as your attempt to pass off your supposition and conjecture as FACT, when I presented TRUE FACTS that contradicted the assertion put forth by another poster

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...40#post1482040

Had you actually READ the link, you would have noted that the CURRENT STATUS HAS NOT RECOVERED FROM THE DEVASTATION THAT BEGAN A CENTURY AGO....and thus the "replanting" is NOT "catching up". Trying to blow off the destruction of a vital link in the ecological soundness of the planet is about the dumbest thing you could try....but you Super Freaking never cease to amaze me in that respect.

Once again, you prove to be one Super Freaking corporate ass kissing fool.



LOL. Poor gullible thing. If the leftist trash told you we were being invaded by Martians you'd buy ut.

And yet another neocon/teabagger/libbertrarian crank who cannot debate the issue and proudly remains willfully ignorant....hence the nonsense Uncle Charley just posted.

Come back when you have something useful to add to the discussion, Chuck. Meanwhile, I'll just ignore you.
 
And yet another neocon/teabagger/libbertrarian crank who cannot debate the issue and proudly remains willfully ignorant....hence the nonsense Uncle Charley just posted.

Come back when you have something useful to add to the discussion, Chuck. Meanwhile, I'll just ignore you.

We just laugh at you. Why should we take seriously a trumped up theory? The debate is over. The American people haven't fallen for the ruse. Give it up
 
Back
Top