Actually, no. Did you get a chance to watch it? There are tons of videos of it on YouTube.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
MSN POLL RESULTS
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
Actually, no. Did you get a chance to watch it? There are tons of videos of it on YouTube.
Cancel 2018.2
Oh, hi
Actually, no. Did you get a chance to watch it? There are tons of videos of it on YouTube.
Put them up.
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
It turned out horribly for Comey.
He unequivocally revealed Trump as a fucking Huuuuuuge liar ...
Comey unequivocally revealed that Trump gave him direction to let the Flynn /Russia investigation go.
Trump lies every fucking day. Everybody knows that. Comey has a reputation for truthfulness.
Your orange clown is in very big trouble for a formal criminal obstruction charge and impeachment, and you think "Comey had a bad day?
You are ridiculous.
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
"Contrary to Kasowitz’s suggestion, there was nothing illegal about Comey’s decision to tell a reporter—directly or indirectly—about the contents of the memos he’d written after his meetings with the president. Furthermore, the notion that the conversations described in those memos were “privileged” is nonsensical. As University of Texas School of Law professor Stephen Vladeck explained to me in an email, that’s not how privilege works:
The President can claim privilege over whatever he wants to, but it’s irrelevant here; privilege is a defense against an effort to compel disclosure (for example, against a subpoena or a warrant). It’s a shield, not a sword. Here, where a former government employee is voluntarily testifying / acting, there just aren’t any criminal consequences for violating even a valid claim of privilege.
The only way there could ever be a criminal case against Comey for leaking his memos, Vladeck told me, is if they contain classified national security information (in that case, a leak could be a violation of the Espionage Act) or information “that has pecuniary value to the United States” (which could be a violation of the federal conversion-of-property statute). Would it be possible to make the argument that the memo Comey leaked did contain that kind of information? “If all he did was memorialize the contents of a conversation with the president the contents of which were not themselves classified, no,” Vladeck says.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...ests_james_comey_broke_the_law_he_didn_t.html
Once Trump discussed the meetings with Comey in a public forum, ( Lester Holt interview), any talk of privileged conversation went out the window.
Trump defeated his only possible defense strategy with his own inability to STFU.
LMFAO
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
He's facing serious legal trouble.
He is not...
You are in error.