Movon dot org bites off man's finger in support of Obama

Status
Not open for further replies.
Against a 65 year old man? Wow.

It depends on the 65 year old man. I have known several that could kick your ass rather easily.

And, if you would recall, you original post said nothing about the age of the MODO guy. So there was no basis for me to assume there was a huge difference in ages.

Shit happens in a fight.
 
Perhaps they could kick your ass but mine? Rather doubtful.

The article describes the "65-year-old male victim" then describes the perp as "a white male, short, with a medium build". The rational conclusion is that the moveondotorg guy was much younger. *shrug*
 
It depends on the 65 year old man. I have known several that could kick your ass rather easily.

And, if you would recall, you original post said nothing about the age of the MODO guy. So there was no basis for me to assume there was a huge difference in ages.

Shit happens in a fight.

Be not so harsh to judgement.

One has to take into account SM's Catholic upbringing, where the occasional insertion of an old man's finger into a bodily cavity is not viewed as an unusual event and the proper response is to grin and bear it.
 
Perhaps they could kick your ass but mine? Rather doubtful.

The article describes the "65-year-old male victim" then describes the perp as "a white male, short, with a medium build". The rational conclusion is that the moveondotorg guy was much younger. *shrug*

Which word is it that describes age?

Does "short" equal young? How about "white male"? Maybe "medium build" is just a code for "young man"?


A couple of old guys I know would quickly change your mind. Of course, you do realize I am talking about kicking ass in the REAL world, not online, don't you? lol
 
Be not so harsh to judgement.

One has to take into account SM's Catholic upbringing, where the occasional insertion of an old man's finger into a bodily cavity is not viewed as an unusual event and the proper response is to grin and bear it.

Perhaps you have explained it after all, Charver. That would explain a lot.
 
Which word is it that describes age?

Does "short" equal young? How about "white male"? Maybe "medium build" is just a code for "young man"?


A couple of old guys I know would quickly change your mind. Of course, you do realize I am talking about kicking ass in the REAL world, not online, don't you? lol
The rational conclusion when comparing two descriptions is that when age is identified in one and not identified in the other that it is not an identifying feature in the latter, therefore the man is relatively younger. *shrug*
 
Be not so harsh to judgement.

One has to take into account SM's Catholic upbringing, where the occasional insertion of an old man's finger into a bodily cavity is not viewed as an unusual event and the proper response is to grin and bear it.
I assure you that in my Catholic upbringing that would be considered a most unusual event, in fact unheard of, although it had been known to occur betwixt employees of the public school system and some fellow students. :pke:
 
The rational conclusion when comparing two descriptions is that when age is identified in one and not identified in the other that it is not an identifying feature in the latter, therefore the man is relatively younger. *shrug*

That is absolutely absurd.
 
I assure you that in my Catholic upbringing that would be considered a most unusual event, in fact unheard of,

Yeah, its not uncommon for victims to deny that anything happened.

We understand you much better now, SM.
 
I assure you that in my Catholic upbringing that would be considered a most unusual event, in fact unheard of, although it had been known to occur betwixt employees of the public school system and some fellow students. :pke:

You must have been the ugly kid in church :(
 
The Southern Man was a fine looking boy and as a fit gentleman still attracts attention from many ladies in church and other venues.

If so, I bet you were very popular with the priests until you were 15 or so.
 
That explains your previous post.

Actually, many of the same attributes that you display here are typical of sexual abuse survivors.

Hostility towards gays.
Bullying
Over exaggerated sexual tones
Tending towards exaggerated shows of machismo

Defending the perpetrators is common as well, which would explain you quickly diverting the attention to public schools whenever abuse by catholic priests is brought up.
 
How much are you willing to bet?

Since its virtually impossible to prove what did or didn't happen in private, several decades ago, I am not willing to wager anything.

YOu would certainly not admit it. I doubt the priest would readily admit it.

So ther eis actually no way to prove it one way or another. But I know what I see on here.
 
In other words you admit to making accusations with no basis except your religious bigotry.

Thats not what I said at all. Care to try reading it again?

I simply said I would not wager on something that is as difficult to prove as this would be. Especially since both people involved would be perfectly willing to lie to save themselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top