More Than 40% of Student Borrowers Aren’t Making Payments

cawacko

Well-known member
This seems healthy and sustainable...

Tax payers are about to get f'd when this bubble bursts.




More Than 40% of Student Borrowers Aren’t Making Payments

New figure raises worries that millions of them may never repay more than $200 billion owed


More than 40% of Americans who borrowed from the government’s main student-loan program aren’t making payments or are behind on more than $200 billion owed, raising worries that millions of them may never repay.

The new figures represent the fallout of a decade long borrowing boom as record numbers of students enrolled in trade schools, universities and graduate schools.

While most have since left school and entered the labor force, 43% of the roughly 22 million Americans with federal student loans weren’t making payments as of Jan. 1, according to a quarterly snapshot of the Education Department’s $1.2 trillion student-loan portfolio.

About 1 in 6 borrowers, or 3.6 million, were in default on $56 billion in student debt, meaning they had gone at least a year without making a payment. Three million more owing roughly $66 billion were at least a month behind.

Meantime, another three million owing almost $110 billion were in “forbearance” or “deferment,” meaning they had received permission to temporarily halt payments due to a financial emergency, such as unemployment.

The figures exclude borrowers still in school and those with government-guaranteed private loans.

The picture has improved slightly from a year earlier, when the nonpayment rate was 46%, but that progress largely reflected a surge in Americans entering a program for distressed borrowers to lower their payments. Enrollment in those plans, which slash monthly bills by tying them to a small percentage of borrowers’ incomes, jumped 48% over the year to 4.6 million borrowers as of Jan. 1.

The Obama administration—worried about taxpayer costs and the prospect of consumers damaging their credit by defaulting—has stepped up efforts to reach borrowers and offer options to enroll in the income-based repayment plans. In some cases, the government is garnishing wages and tax refunds of borrowers who refuse to pay.

But officials acknowledge that a large pool of borrowers have essentially fallen off the radar. Loan servicers—companies the government hires to collect debt—say they can’t reach such defaulted borrowers despite hundreds of attempts through phone calls, text messages and emails. The Education Department has assembled a “behavioral sciences unit” to study the psychology of borrowers and why they don’t repay.

“We obviously have not cracked that nut but we want to keep working on it,” said Ted Mitchell, the Education Department’s undersecretary. He said many defaulted borrowers dropped out of school and are underemployed.

Carlo Salerno, an economist who studies higher education and has consulted for the private student-lending industry, noted that the government imposes virtually no credit checks on borrowers, requires no cosigners and doesn’t screen people for their preparedness for college-level course work.

“On what planet does a financing vehicle with those kinds of terms and those kinds of performance metrics make sense,” he said.

Some borrowers aren’t repaying even when they can. Research from Navient Corp. , which services loans for the government, shows that borrowers prioritize other bills—such as car loans, mortgages and heating bills—over student debt. A borrower who fails to pay down an auto loan might have her car repossessed; with student loans, there is no such threat.

Kristopher Mathews, 38 years old, is in deferment on about $11,900 in federal student loans. During the recession he earned a certificate at a Michigan-based for-profit college that teaches media arts, but he wasn’t able to find the well-paying job in radio that he hoped for.

Mr. Mathews now works as a logistical analyst for a U.S. auto company, making $46,000 annually. He says he devotes his income to caring for his family—he and his fiancée have three children—and then paying off two credit cards and a car loan. “With all the other necessities in life I just don’t have” funds to pay the student debt, Mr. Mathews said.

Once his deferment expires, he isn’t sure if he will feel obliged to pay down his loan. “They promised me everything,” he said of his for-profit college. “And I honestly have nothing to show for it except a piece of paper that doesn’t really do me any good.”

Most borrowers who have defaulted owe relatively little—a median $8,900, according to the Education Department.

Advocacy groups, some members of Congress and the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have faulted loan servicers for not doing enough to reach troubled borrowers to offer repayment options. But the picture is more complicated.

Navient, which also services private loans, says it attempts to reach each borrower on average 230 to 300 times—through letters, emails, calls and text messages—in the year leading up to his or her default. Ninety percent of those borrowers, which include federal borrowers as well as those who hold private loans, never respond and more than half never made a single payment before they defaulted, the company says.

The administration maintains that the student-loan program, as a whole, will generate a profit over the long term, but the risk is rising that the revenue won’t meet the administration’s projections.

Even many borrowers who are current on their loans are paying very little. More than a third of borrowers on an income-based repayment plan had monthly payments of zero because their incomes were so low, according to a Navient survey last year.

The Education Department, through private debt-collection agencies, garnished $176 million in Americans’ wages in the final three months of last year for student debt, federal data show.

The administration’s pursuit of troubled borrowers is drawing criticism from student advocates and their allies in Congress. Last week, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Consumer Law Center sued the Education Department, accusing it of blocking public access to data on the agency’s debt-collection efforts. The groups suggested that the companies collecting debt for the department might be discriminating against black and Hispanic borrowers.

Dorie Nolt, a spokeswoman for Education Secretary John B. King Jr., said the agency is reviewing the groups’ public-information requests.

“The singular goal of our student loan program is to help all students get a degree that sets them up for success, and we take the treatment of our borrowers—particularly historically underserved students—very seriously,” Ms. Nolt said in an email.



http://www.wsj.com/articles/more-than-40-of-student-borrowers-arent-making-payments-1459971348
 
According to liberals, Obama's economy is wonderful...how come these people don't have jobs and pay back what they owe?? Or do they think everything is free??
 
It's called moral hazard. Obummer merely transferred the housing crisis to the student loan crisis. But don't tell Thingy. His feelings will get hurt
 
This seems healthy and sustainable...

Tax payers are about to get f'd when this bubble bursts.




More Than 40% of Student Borrowers Aren’t Making Payments

New figure raises worries that millions of them may never repay more than $200 billion owed


More than 40% of Americans who borrowed from the government’s main student-loan program aren’t making payments or are behind on more than $200 billion owed, raising worries that millions of them may never repay.

The new figures represent the fallout of a decade long borrowing boom as record numbers of students enrolled in trade schools, universities and graduate schools.

While most have since left school and entered the labor force, 43% of the roughly 22 million Americans with federal student loans weren’t making payments as of Jan. 1, according to a quarterly snapshot of the Education Department’s $1.2 trillion student-loan portfolio.

About 1 in 6 borrowers, or 3.6 million, were in default on $56 billion in student debt, meaning they had gone at least a year without making a payment. Three million more owing roughly $66 billion were at least a month behind.

Meantime, another three million owing almost $110 billion were in “forbearance” or “deferment,” meaning they had received permission to temporarily halt payments due to a financial emergency, such as unemployment.

The figures exclude borrowers still in school and those with government-guaranteed private loans.

The picture has improved slightly from a year earlier, when the nonpayment rate was 46%, but that progress largely reflected a surge in Americans entering a program for distressed borrowers to lower their payments. Enrollment in those plans, which slash monthly bills by tying them to a small percentage of borrowers’ incomes, jumped 48% over the year to 4.6 million borrowers as of Jan. 1.

The Obama administration—worried about taxpayer costs and the prospect of consumers damaging their credit by defaulting—has stepped up efforts to reach borrowers and offer options to enroll in the income-based repayment plans. In some cases, the government is garnishing wages and tax refunds of borrowers who refuse to pay.

But officials acknowledge that a large pool of borrowers have essentially fallen off the radar. Loan servicers—companies the government hires to collect debt—say they can’t reach such defaulted borrowers despite hundreds of attempts through phone calls, text messages and emails. The Education Department has assembled a “behavioral sciences unit” to study the psychology of borrowers and why they don’t repay.

“We obviously have not cracked that nut but we want to keep working on it,” said Ted Mitchell, the Education Department’s undersecretary. He said many defaulted borrowers dropped out of school and are underemployed.

Carlo Salerno, an economist who studies higher education and has consulted for the private student-lending industry, noted that the government imposes virtually no credit checks on borrowers, requires no cosigners and doesn’t screen people for their preparedness for college-level course work.

“On what planet does a financing vehicle with those kinds of terms and those kinds of performance metrics make sense,” he said.

Some borrowers aren’t repaying even when they can. Research from Navient Corp. , which services loans for the government, shows that borrowers prioritize other bills—such as car loans, mortgages and heating bills—over student debt. A borrower who fails to pay down an auto loan might have her car repossessed; with student loans, there is no such threat.

Kristopher Mathews, 38 years old, is in deferment on about $11,900 in federal student loans. During the recession he earned a certificate at a Michigan-based for-profit college that teaches media arts, but he wasn’t able to find the well-paying job in radio that he hoped for.

Mr. Mathews now works as a logistical analyst for a U.S. auto company, making $46,000 annually. He says he devotes his income to caring for his family—he and his fiancée have three children—and then paying off two credit cards and a car loan. “With all the other necessities in life I just don’t have” funds to pay the student debt, Mr. Mathews said.

Once his deferment expires, he isn’t sure if he will feel obliged to pay down his loan. “They promised me everything,” he said of his for-profit college. “And I honestly have nothing to show for it except a piece of paper that doesn’t really do me any good.”

Most borrowers who have defaulted owe relatively little—a median $8,900, according to the Education Department.

Advocacy groups, some members of Congress and the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have faulted loan servicers for not doing enough to reach troubled borrowers to offer repayment options. But the picture is more complicated.

Navient, which also services private loans, says it attempts to reach each borrower on average 230 to 300 times—through letters, emails, calls and text messages—in the year leading up to his or her default. Ninety percent of those borrowers, which include federal borrowers as well as those who hold private loans, never respond and more than half never made a single payment before they defaulted, the company says.

The administration maintains that the student-loan program, as a whole, will generate a profit over the long term, but the risk is rising that the revenue won’t meet the administration’s projections.

Even many borrowers who are current on their loans are paying very little. More than a third of borrowers on an income-based repayment plan had monthly payments of zero because their incomes were so low, according to a Navient survey last year.

The Education Department, through private debt-collection agencies, garnished $176 million in Americans’ wages in the final three months of last year for student debt, federal data show.

The administration’s pursuit of troubled borrowers is drawing criticism from student advocates and their allies in Congress. Last week, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Consumer Law Center sued the Education Department, accusing it of blocking public access to data on the agency’s debt-collection efforts. The groups suggested that the companies collecting debt for the department might be discriminating against black and Hispanic borrowers.

Dorie Nolt, a spokeswoman for Education Secretary John B. King Jr., said the agency is reviewing the groups’ public-information requests.

“The singular goal of our student loan program is to help all students get a degree that sets them up for success, and we take the treatment of our borrowers—particularly historically underserved students—very seriously,” Ms. Nolt said in an email.



http://www.wsj.com/articles/more-than-40-of-student-borrowers-arent-making-payments-1459971348
Two problems here. Tuition costs are grossly excessive and something needs to be done about it. Second, buyer beware, going $100,000 in debt for a basket weaving major is not sound financial planning.

I think the percentage in default is some what not representative. The overwhelming majority of those will not stay in default. I was in default of my student loan in my early 30's when I lost my job and it took me a while to get back on my feat. I paid a hefty fine but got back on track and paid it all off. Most of these young people will do so too.

Still and all something needs to be done about the grossly excessive costs of a college education. If parents new just what a small percentage of their tuition dollars and State funding went to pay for class room instruction at most State Universities they'd probably riot and lynch a few Public University Administrators.
 
Two problems here. Tuition costs are grossly excessive and something needs to be done about it. Second, buyer beware, going $100,000 in debt for a basket weaving major is not sound financial planning.

I think the percentage in default is some what not representative. The overwhelming majority of those will not stay in default. I was in default of my student loan in my early 30's when I lost my job and it took me a while to get back on my feat. I paid a hefty fine but got back on track and paid it all off. Most of these young people will do so too.

Still and all something needs to be done about the grossly excessive costs of a college education. If parents new just what a small percentage of their tuition dollars and State funding went to pay for class room instruction at most State Universities they'd probably riot and lynch a few Public University Administrators.

There is a definite correlation between the government becoming a major player in the student loan game and the rise in the increase in tuition.
 
Two problems here. Tuition costs are grossly excessive and something needs to be done about it. Second, buyer beware, going $100,000 in debt for a basket weaving major is not sound financial planning.

I think the percentage in default is some what not representative. The overwhelming majority of those will not stay in default. I was in default of my student loan in my early 30's when I lost my job and it took me a while to get back on my feat. I paid a hefty fine but got back on track and paid it all off. Most of these young people will do so too.

Still and all something needs to be done about the grossly excessive costs of a college education. If parents new just what a small percentage of their tuition dollars and State funding went to pay for class room instruction at most State Universities they'd probably riot and lynch a few Public University Administrators.

What if we just mandated price controls for all colleges? No tuition can be more than $5,000/year

This is where the GOP could back the democrat party into a corner. Force them to oppose the premise of price controls which the democrat party calls for in other areas
 
Once Cruz takes office, I anticipate he will sick Justice and Treasury on the state system nationwide for a massive round of auditing (or work through the state governors, auditors, and AGs to get it done). It does need to happen, because, the colleges have gotten out-of-control with their obvious price-gouging and waste.

OTOH, if Bernie gets elected, we will go from 40% delinquent to 100%, because he's going to bail us all out. D
 
What if we just mandated price controls for all colleges? No tuition can be more than $5,000/year

This is where the GOP could back the democrat party into a corner. Force them to oppose the premise of price controls which the democrat party calls for in other areas

Big government conservatards
All to do abut nothing
Being late is not the same as default
 
Big government conservatards
All to do abut nothing
Being late is not the same as default

Hey Grand Wizard of Finance, did I say it was?

I am merely commenting on the high price of college (run by you leftists) and why leftists don't call for price controls. You leftists don't have problems calling for price controls in other areas like medicine and energy.

Is that confusing for a Chalmette guy like you? BTW when are you going to the 9th ward to teach your financial prowess to the blacks in the name of affirmative action and helping the oppressed? Or are you all talk?
 
Hey Grand Wizard of Finance, did I say it was?

I am merely commenting on the high price of college (run by you leftists) and why leftists don't call for price controls. You leftists don't have problems calling for price controls in other areas like medicine and energy.

Is that confusing for a Chalmette guy like you? BTW when are you going to the 9th ward to teach your financial prowess to the blacks in the name of affirmative action and helping the oppressed? Or are you all talk?

There is nothing but smoke and mirrors here
Baldy
 
Wow that's rich coming from you

Can studen loans be written off in bankruptcy?
And no I don't want to ski race!

Grand Wizard of Finance is spinning like Deshtard. Tell us again about your carried interest LOL

Again, I asked you a specific question about the cost of college and you pull a Deshtard.

Back to the ski race thing again? Do you have dementia? I don't ski. Why would I challenge you to a ski race. Of course there are all of those ski slopes in Chalmette LOL
 
It's not a problem because the lan can't be written off!
Did they mention default rates?
No they didn't

So you are saying the high cost of college education isn't a problem?

And you are saying if students don't pay back their debts it is not a problem?

Well you are the Grand Wizard of Finance so if you say so.

Hear that everyone? Topspin the Grand Wizard of Finance says that students not paying back student loans is no big deal. And he would know. He was a bookkeeper at an oil company processing payroll. So nobody knows more than he does.

He is heading off to the Chalmette Country Club so you will have to wait to ask him for follow up
 
Two problems here. Tuition costs are grossly excessive and something needs to be done about it. Second, buyer beware, going $100,000 in debt for a basket weaving major is not sound financial planning.

I think the percentage in default is some what not representative. The overwhelming majority of those will not stay in default. I was in default of my student loan in my early 30's when I lost my job and it took me a while to get back on my feat. I paid a hefty fine but got back on track and paid it all off. Most of these young people will do so too.

Still and all something needs to be done about the grossly excessive costs of a college education. If parents new just what a small percentage of their tuition dollars and State funding went to pay for class room instruction at most State Universities they'd probably riot and lynch a few Public University Administrators.

What do you propose, price control by the government?

Can you provide proof of your claim that most will not stay in default?
 
What do you propose, price control by the government?

Can you provide proof of your claim that most will not stay in default?

Isn't it amazing that liberals NEVER call for price controls on colleges?

College tuition had grown faster than medical expenses and oil and liberals called for price controls of them

Why have liberals never said Big College is gouging students?
 
Isn't it amazing that liberals NEVER call for price controls on colleges?

College tuition had grown faster than medical expenses and oil and liberals called for price controls of them

Why have liberals never said Big College is gouging students?

It's the primary place for them to try and indoctrinate people.
 
Back
Top