How is Trump a traitor? I know you morons on the left think that you can just bloviate a bunch of bullshit, but that doesn't make it less moronic.
More Than 1,100 Former DOJ Officials Press For Attorney General Barr To Step Down
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
How is Trump a traitor? I know you morons on the left think that you can just bloviate a bunch of bullshit, but that doesn't make it less moronic.
Mason Michaels
Verified User
Stone a elected official?
What does that have to do with my response to the other weak minded low IQ asshat leftist?
What did Roger Stone do to warrant an investigation, an interrogation and the eventual early morning assault on him and his property the morning of January 25, 2019?
Last edited:
Mason Michaels
Verified User
The charges he was convicted,and sentenced for.
That wasn't the question you illiterate dunce; try again.
What did Roger Stone do to warrant an investigation, an interrogation and the eventual early morning assault on him and his property the morning of January 25, 2019?
Don't tell so many lies and people won't have to post plethoras of examples to prove that you're lying.
Economists agree: Trump, not Obama, gets credit for economy
View attachment 14328
As already posted above, economists agree that YOU are the only one posturing or prevaricating here.
Try again, dishonest demagogue.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Don't tell so many lies and people won't have to post plethoras of examples to prove that you're lying.
Economists agree: Trump, not Obama, gets credit for economy
As already posted above, economists agree that YOU are the only one posturing or prevaricating here.
Try again, dishonest demagogue.
A link to an article that's two years old? That's your evidence?
How about posting a more recent article about economists who weren't hand-picked by a conservative, trump-supporting paper? A paper that lost dozens of employees because of their attempt to whitewash and normalize trump btw, lol.
Try again, scurrilous spinmeister.
Centerleftfl
Verified User
Final count was 2100.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
A link to an article that's two years old? That's your evidence?
How about posting a more recent article about economists who weren't hand-picked by a conservative, trump-supporting paper? A paper that lost dozens of employees because of their attempt to whitewash and normalize trump btw, lol.
Try again, scurrilous spinmeister.
Surely if it was true then it's even more so now, n'est-ce pas? Obama's economy was created on the back of a massive injection of QE liquidity from the Fed, in total over $4 trillion.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You are going to be inconsolable come November, you'd better pray for a massive recession as that's the only way Colonel Sanders is going to get elected. He's your version of Jezza Corbyn and will suffer the exact same fate.
With Bernie Sanders as nominee, Democrats face tough task of running against capitalism
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/elizabeth-warrens-mocks-michael-bloombergs-height
So? Who cares?
Centerleftfl
Verified User
The anti-AUTHORITARIANS. You know, the 'rule of law' types. Quaint concept, huh?
Centerleftfl
Verified User
Good call genius? I'm sure you are SO SOLVENT you well be unfazed. Your pickup and doublewide paid off?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Was it true then? From the article: "The Wall Street Journal asked 68 business, financial and academic economists who was responsible for the strengthening of the economy..."
Not a single person is named in the article. WSJ needs to name names and let the reader decide how believable these people are.
Obama brought us out of the bush Great Recession on a steady upward trajectory. I don't know why people are so critical of him. What are some alternatives to QE and would they have worked better and faster? People also whined about TARP but check this out.
"On the political front, widespread anger at banking bailouts and stimulus measures (begun by President George W. Bush and continued or expanded by President Obama) with few consequences for banking leadership, were a factor in driving the country politically rightward starting in 2010. The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was the largest of the bailouts. In 2008, TARP allocated $426.4 billion to various major financial institutions. However, the US collected $441.7 billion in return from these loans in 2010, recording a profit of $15.3 billion."
and
"As of January 2018, bailout funds had been fully recovered by the government, when interest on loans is taken into consideration. A total of $626B was invested, loaned, or granted due to various bailout measures, while $390B had been returned to the Treasury. The Treasury had earned another $323B in interest on bailout loans, resulting in an $87B profit."
A link to an article that's two years old? That's your evidence?
From when Trump first took office? Um...yeah, of course. You think it becomes LESS Trump's economy the longer we live under Trump?
What a fucking moron.
The Hill is now suddenly conservative?
And how exactly are the facts presented in this article refuted by your off-topic "smear the source" fallacy?
Not joining the rest of the media in humiliating and discrediting themselves with biased lunatic conspiracy theories, self-contradicting partisan hysteria, and blatantly false narratives (aka 'practicing journalism') is now "whitewashing and normalizing" the already normal and non-controversial?
Nice logic.
When do we get to the part where you refute anything that has been presented in the article? Or did you think no one would notice that all of these off-topic fallacies were just diversionary attempts to avoid the debate?
Try again, dishonest demagogue.
Last edited: