More sexual perversion!


From the article you cited as "proof": "It will be a long time, if ever, before a doctor can do a brain scan on a child and say, “Yes, this child is trans.”

Some people are born cis men, some people are born trans men.

I didn't think you could prove your claim, and it appears that I was correct.

Naturally, I understand.
 
From the article you cited as "proof": "It will be a long time, if ever, before a doctor can do a brain scan on a child and say, “Yes, this child is trans.”



I didn't think you could prove your claim, and it appears that I was correct.

Naturally, I understand.

Not what I said.
The article explains that trans people have the brain structure of the gender they identify with. Which proves my point that some people are born as trans men or trans women.
However, that doesn't mean everyone will experience gender dysphoria, which is what the article means. Brains also develop as people age, so not everyone may actually become cis or trans at the same point. You also took that quote out of context. Here is this full paragraph: "Overall the weight of these studies and others points strongly toward a biological basis for gender dysphoria. But given the variety of transgender people and the variation in the brains of men and women generally, it will be a long time, if ever, before a doctor can do a brain scan on a child and say, “Yes, this child is trans.”" In short, gender dysphoria is biological and trans men are generically connected to cis men on certain level. But because gender if fluid, it's not clear cut.
 
The article explains that trans people have the brain structure of the gender they identify with.

It says this: "Imaging studies and other research suggest that there is a biological basis for transgender identity."

It's speculative.

You have failed to prove your claim.

Some people are born cis men, some people are born trans men.

I didn't think you could prove that what you said was a fact, and it looks like my skepticism was justified.

Naturally, understand.
 
It says this: "Imaging studies and other research suggest that there is a biological basis for transgender identity."

It's speculative.

You have failed to prove your claim.



I didn't think you could prove that what you said was a fact, and it looks like my skepticism was justified.

Naturally, understand.

:laugh:

Do you know how science works? Nothing is ever declared a 100% true fact. Scientists use evidence to determine what is most likely true and that's considered a fact. Right now, it's most likely true that being trans is genetic.
I know you Fascists don't care about facts, but you should at least learn about how the scientific community goes about declaring something a fact.
 
Nothing is ever declared a 100% true fact.

Yet that's what you did.

Some people are born cis men, some people are born trans men.

I didn't think you could prove that what you said was a fact, and it looks like my skepticism was justified.

Naturally, I understand completely.

What seems apparent to me is that you really want this to be true.

But facts don't care about your feelings, do they?
 
The slippery slope to normalizing pedophilia is getting quite slick!

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/20/netflix-pandering-pedophiles-everywhere/

Netflix, in a new series called “Cuties,” is blatantly sexualizing little girls. And tens of thousands have already signed a petition demanding the show’s removal from public streaming.

But how could such a horrifying show make it past the pitch room in the first place?

Netflix, the media company that panders to the pedophile crowd. What a brand concept.

TOP STORIES
'Riding the Dragon': Documentary probes Hunter Biden's dealing in China
Nevada city threatens company for hosting Trump rally
Will Antifa and Black Lives Matter cancel the Biden-Harris ticket?

“Netflix is premiering *Cuties* on September 9,” tweeted one member of the Catholic cloth, as Mediaite reported. “Here’s the plot summary — the promotional image is 11 year olds dressed in clothes inappropriate for adults (so bad I won’t tweet it). I can’t believe we need to say pedophilia is wrong … But so many went to Epstein’s Island.”

Even the program description from Netflix sounds bad.

It first read, “Amy, 11, becomes fascinated with a twerking dance crew. Hoping to join them, she starts to explore her femininity, defying her family’s traditions.”

After mass outrage, Netflix issued an apology and watered down the descriptive text.

The new Netflix billing reads: “Eleven-year-old Amy starts to rebel against her conservative family’s traditions when she becomes fascinated with a free-spirited dance crew,” Netflix writes of its series.

But if pictures say a thousand words, just watch the trailer.

The phrase “free-spirited” is somewhat of a misnomer. All that’s missing is the pole. Let’s remember: 11-year-olds are generally sixth graders. They color with crayons, they jump rope for fun, they giggle at members of the opposite sex. They watch cartoons on Saturday mornings.

Except on Netflix, where they serve as booty-shaking sex dolls for the pervert class. Apparently.

More than 41,000 have signed the Change.org petition to remove the show from Netflix. Good.

Who owned and profited from Mrs. Teen U.S.A.?
 
This is one stupid card for them to play. :laugh:

When Trump walks into a massage parlor, even the fish stop swimming. He fucks anything that moves.
 
Being as it is sexual perversion, of course one would make the slippery slope argument, and we were right! They are trying to normalize pedophilia! What is wrong with you people that you are so afraid to condemn it! Regardless of political affiliation it is wrong!

Where is your condemnation of all the child beauty pageants that are still going on in this country even after Jon Benet's murder? What kind of parent would let their kid dress and pose provocatively when the pics are going to make the rounds on pedo websites?

iu
 
Back
Top