wiseones2cents
Verified User
There are terrorist groups all over the planet. They are called organized crime.
More problems in Iraq
- Thread starter wiseones2cents
- Start date
There are terrorist groups all over the planet. They are called organized crime.
wiseones2cents
Verified User
OK. Then tell us which terrorist group Saddam had ties to?
wiseones2cents
Verified User
There is no question in my mind that the war in Iraq has to do with oil. American soldiers are dying for corporate interest. It has nothing to do with terrorism or freedom.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Hamas, he'd stop in to give the families of suicide bombers huge lottery-style checks, you know those huge checks that represent the actual check so you can take pictures of him giving it, for their efforts at killing bus loads of kids...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/04/03/world/main505316.shtml
wiseones2cents
Verified User
I didn't want to dig up this thread but MAN was this link hilarious! US has more oil then Saudi Arabia! No where but on JPP will you find this secret!ROTFLMAO!!!!
wiseones2cents
Verified User
I've already acknowledged this. Still no cause to go to war. Well...unless you are an Israeli. last time I checked? Americans weren't Israeli, but the Jews certainly have alot(understatement) of influence in America. They own it through credit....
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
So funny that after 4 months you still can't dispute it.
wiseones2cents
Verified User
So funny that after 4 months you still can't dispute it.
Ummm sorry to burst your bubble but?
Oil reserves - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Oil_Reserves.png" class="image"><img alt="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e3/Oil_Reserves.png/400px-Oil_Reserves.png"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/e/e3/Oil_Reserves.png/400px-Oil_Reserves.png
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Wiki? LOL
Socrtease
Verified User
This is not a retort. You are one of the people that ALWAYS bashes Wikipedia. Why? Why is it not accurate? Here is a Wikipedia page on Mars
Mars - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Mars_symbol.svg" class="image" title="Astronomical symbol of Mars"><img alt="Astronomical symbol of Mars" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/Mars_symbol.svg/25px-Mars_symbol.svg.png"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/b/b7/Mars_symbol.svg/25px-Mars_symbol.svg.png
This is accurate.
Here is another on RMS Titanic, it is also accurate.
RMS Titanic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:RMS_Titanic_3.jpg" class="image"><img alt="RMS Titanic 3.jpg" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fd/RMS_Titanic_3.jpg/350px-RMS_Titanic_3.jpg"@@AMEPARAM@@commons/thumb/f/fd/RMS_Titanic_3.jpg/350px-RMS_Titanic_3.jpg
I can literally do this for 10's of thousands of articles on Wikipedia. Why is the one you are laughing at wrong?
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
The subjects of Mars and the Titanic aren't controversial.
Socrtease
Verified User
So your assertion is that ANYTHING controversial on Wikipedia is wrong? Do you have valid evidence for this? Or is this just your gut feeling when the wiki article does not back your view of the world?
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
No, just that its not a credible source.
Socrtease
Verified User
The source for the Oil Reserve information was NOT Wikipedia, and very rarely is wikipedia not footnoted, in articles that are not footnoted I would agree with you, but as I pointed out, the Wiki article in this post that you are LOLing is from the CIA worldbook. A VERY credible source.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Then a wise one would have linked to that site, not Wiki.
wiseones2cents
Verified User
Then a wise one would have linked to that site, not Wiki.
Come on Yankee! Any reliable source will tell you that Canada and the Middle EAST have the vast majority of discovered oil.