More neocon lies exposed

bravo said:
Even the video on Mediamatters (the far left-wing blog) of O'Reilly reporting the issue for the first time, shows a news alert on the screen announcing the womens resignation....so much for your "documented" timeline crap....


The messiah fired her without ever checking on the accuracy of the video.....JUST LIKE Bbart....only one of the assholes is the POTUS....the other an inconsequential blogger.....

"Documented timeline" your ass.... its obviously wrong....
Click to expand...

Bravo, you are one dumb SOB....the Media Matters link CLEARLY shows the timeline when FoxNews.com and Fox Nation aired the video and commented on it LONG BEFORE O'REILLY GOT INTO THE FRAY...by 1:40 p.m. O'Reilly didn't come on until around later that evening.

My God, Bravo...you're so fucking dumb that you lie about things that are documented and easily checked. Pull your head out of Limbaugh's ass and get your act together, you intellectually impotent cretin.:palm:
 
christiefan915 said:
....The video clip is of Sherrod admitting she discriminated against a white farmer in 1986, while she was a member of the NAACP...

Where does it say she was a member in 1986?
Click to expand...

Don't you know....Dixie says so therefore it is....no valid documentation necessary. And if there is such information that contradicts him, he'll just ignore it.

He's just another sheet wearing revisionist parrot....and I'm not just whistl'in Dixie!
 
Taichiliberal said:
Don't you know....Dixie says so therefore it is....no valid documentation necessary. And if there is such information that contradicts him, he'll just ignore it.

He's just another sheet wearing revisionist parrot....and I'm not just whistl'in Dixie!
Click to expand...

Then you must be hummin Dixie.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Bravo, you are one dumb SOB....the Media Matters link CLEARLY shows the timeline when FoxNews.com and Fox Nation aired the video and commented on it LONG BEFORE O'REILLY GOT INTO THE FRAY...by 1:40 p.m. O'Reilly didn't come on until around later that evening.

My God, Bravo...you're so fucking dumb that you lie about things that are documented and easily checked. Pull your head out of Limbaugh's ass and get your act together, you intellectually impotent cretin.:palm:
Click to expand...

You keep spewing your shit, but you haven't proven a damn thing yet. Fox News did not report on the story or air the video until O'Reilly's show, which aired after she resigned! Now you lying shitheads are changing your story to claim it was the Fox website... and that is pretty fucking convenient, since the website is constantly updating breaking news!

But here's the real kicker.... IT DOESN'T MATTER when Fox reported it, or anyone else! The Obama Administration was the ONLY PARTY responsible for Sherrod's forced resignation! Fox didn't MAKE them do that! My god, you act like the Left has NEVER pulled some bullshit like this before.... that idiot Keith Olbermann used to fill up his entire show with out of context stories about Bush and Cheney! Micheal Moore released "documentaries" chock FULL of lies and distortions about Bush, without ANY context or objectiveness! You people spent the better part of 8 years doing this sort of thing DAILY, and STILL DO IT! In the words of Dick Cheney, WHY DON'T YOU GO FUCK YOURSELF!
 
Sherrod, clearly says she did not do all she could for the "poor white farmer" who she perceived to be somehow both asking for her help and simultaneously "trying to show me he was superior to me.

In her OWN words....
"[The white farmer] was trying to show me he was superior to me," she said, recalling the day some 24 years ago. "I knew what he was doing, but he had to come to me for help."

"What he didn't know while he was taking all that time trying to show me he was superior to me was, I was trying to decide just how much help I was going to give him," Sherrod said on the video, recorded "I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough."
She admits that she did just "enough" for the farmer so as to cover her own sense of accountability and then: "I took him to a white lawyer ... I figured if I took him to one of them, then his own kind would take care of him."
Clearly an act of racism...undeniable...she admits it...
=======================================================================

Sherrod has second thoughts...(but this does not negate her racist actions in the first place...

she discovered the white lawyer she had referred the Spooners to took their money for six months, but did nothing to help them.

"This lawyer told them, ‘ya'll are getting old ... why don't you just let go of the farm,'" she said. "I could not believe he said that to them."

Sherrod said she'd learned her lesson.

"It's about the poor," Sherrod said, just over 20 minutes into the speech. "It made me see it really was about those who have, versus those who don't ... black, white or Hispanic.

"It made me realize that I needed to work to help poor people ... those who don't have access the way others have."

She said the incident helped her get beyond issues of race.

"And I went on to work with many more white farmers," she said. "The story helped me realize that race is not the issue, it's about the people who have and the people who don't."

It cracks me up how TC Peckerhead trys to change the issue to Bbart and the Fox website.....
I hope this women sews Bbart....she don't stand a chance of winning and her admitted racism will be showcased for us all over again.....
 
I defy all the nay sayers here to provide documented, valid proof that FoxNews.com and Fox Nation did NOT carry the edited version of the Sherrod speech HOURS before O'Reilly did, as DOCUMENTED by Media Matters time line of Breitbart's slander. NOT more of their opinion or supposition or conjecture, but a valid, documented timeline.

http://mediamatters.org/research/201007220004

I defy all nay sayers to logically explain how an EDITED excerpt of a speech that is run WITH COMMENTARY to portray Sherrod as stating she DENIED a man services due to racism and an audience "applauding" her bigotry... that she later felt guilty but just turned the man over to a white lawyer to wash her hands of him is NOT "out of context" when viewing the FULL, UNEDITED section of that episode tells a completely different tale!

http://www.slate.com/id/2261552
http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/pagenum/2

I defy all nay sayers to CONTINUE to claim Sherrod commited an act of bigotry when the very farmer who is the subject of her story CORROBORATES her story, and COMPLETELY REJECTS the neocon noise machine a'la' Breitbart

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/20/sherrod-white-farmers/

I defy the nay sayers to explain how Breitbart's own public admissions regarding when and why he ran the video are not admissions to his willing promotion of unchecked material to promote his railings against the NAACP is NOT the most blatant example of convoluted logic going

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20011257-503544.html
 
bravo said:
Sherrod, clearly says she did not do all she could for the "poor white farmer" who she perceived to be somehow both asking for her help and simultaneously "trying to show me he was superior to me.

In her OWN words....
"[The white farmer] was trying to show me he was superior to me," she said, recalling the day some 24 years ago. "I knew what he was doing, but he had to come to me for help."

"What he didn't know while he was taking all that time trying to show me he was superior to me was, I was trying to decide just how much help I was going to give him," Sherrod said on the video, recorded "I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland, and here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land. So I didn't give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough."
She admits that she did just "enough" for the farmer so as to cover her own sense of accountability and then: "I took him to a white lawyer ... I figured if I took him to one of them, then his own kind would take care of him."
Clearly an act of racism...undeniable...she admits it...
=======================================================================

Sherrod has second thoughts...(but this does not negate her racist actions in the first place...

she discovered the white lawyer she had referred the Spooners to took their money for six months, but did nothing to help them.

"This lawyer told them, ‘ya'll are getting old ... why don't you just let go of the farm,'" she said. "I could not believe he said that to them."

Sherrod said she'd learned her lesson.

"It's about the poor," Sherrod said, just over 20 minutes into the speech. "It made me see it really was about those who have, versus those who don't ... black, white or Hispanic.

"It made me realize that I needed to work to help poor people ... those who don't have access the way others have."

She said the incident helped her get beyond issues of race.

"And I went on to work with many more white farmers," she said. "The story helped me realize that race is not the issue, it's about the people who have and the people who don't."

It cracks me up how TC Peckerhead trys to change the issue to Bbart and the Fox website.....
I hope this women sews Bbart....she don't stand a chance of winning and her admitted racism will be showcased for us all over again.....
Click to expand...

Your willfully ignorant parrot brain was already schooled on this, Bravo

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=684572&postcount=60

And Post #24 just makes you out to be a neocon monkey with his eyes & ears covered. Grow the fuck up, Bravo and stop being so stubbornly damned dumb!
 
Taichiliberal said:
I defy all the nay sayers here to provide documented, valid proof that FoxNews.com and Fox Nation did NOT carry the edited version of the Sherrod speech HOURS before O'Reilly did, as DOCUMENTED by Media Matters time line of Breitbart's slander. NOT more of their opinion or supposition or conjecture, but a valid, documented timeline.
And there were others that also carried the news and the only version of the video available, the edited version....and Obama, the fool, fired the women HOURS before O'Reilly did his show....so what.
http://mediamatters.org/research/201007220004

I defy all nay sayers to logically explain how an EDITED excerpt of a speech that is run WITH COMMENTARY to portray Sherrod as stating she DENIED a man services due to racism and an audience "applauding" her bigotry... that she later felt guilty but just turned the man over to a white lawyer to wash her hands of him is NOT "out of context" when viewing the FULL, UNEDITED section of that episode tells a completely different tale!
Theres nothing to logically explain....the video speaks for itself...just listen to her own words, she admits not doing everything she could have for the man, and turning him over to a "white" lawyer..one of "his own kind" (her words)
http://www.slate.com/id/2261552
http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/pagenum/2

I defy all nay sayers to CONTINUE to claim Sherrod commited an act of bigotry when the very farmer who is the subject of her story CORROBORATES her story, and COMPLETELY REJECTS the neocon noise machine a'la' Breitbart

Yeah, the farmer was very grateful for her "change of heart"....the change SHE ADMITS to in the video you fool....they never realized she didn't do everything she could have (by her own admission),before she sent them to the white lawyer...
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/20/sherrod-white-farmers/

I defy the nay sayers to explain how Breitbart's own public admissions regarding when and why he ran the video are not admissions to his willing promotion of unchecked material to promote his railings against the NAACP is NOT the most blatant example of convoluted logic going
haha...and I defy anyone to explain why Obamas firing her without knowing the facts is not MORE egregious than Bbarts silly bullshit with the bigots of the naacp....
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20011257-503544.html
Click to expand...
.now really....you bore me....you're dismissed.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
I defy all the nay sayers here to provide documented, valid proof that FoxNews.com and Fox Nation did NOT carry the edited version of the Sherrod speech HOURS before O'Reilly did, as DOCUMENTED by Media Matters time line of Breitbart's slander. NOT more of their opinion or supposition or conjecture, but a valid, documented timeline.

http://mediamatters.org/research/201007220004

Bravo wrote:
And there were others that also carried the news and the only version of the video available, the edited version....and Obama, the fool, fired the women HOURS before O'Reilly did his show....so what.

So you are one cowardly, dishonest little neocon parrot, Bravo old thing. The chronology of the post clearly shows you and others making the assertion that Fox News was NOT involved in the broadcasting and hyping of Breitbarts slander prior to O'Reilly....and now that I've proven you wrong on that point, you try to dismiss/diminish it. Bottom line: Breitbart put forth a lie, Fox and other neocon bullhorns ran with it...THEY NEVER CHECKED IT'S VALIDITY...and Valslick (sp) panicked. That the Obama administration has egg on it's face DOES NOT DETRACT FROM THE SLANDER PERPETRAITED BY BREITBART, AND HOW THE NEOCON PUNDITRY BULLHORNED IT WITH RELISH.

I defy all nay sayers to logically explain how an EDITED excerpt of a speech that is run WITH COMMENTARY to portray Sherrod as stating she DENIED a man services due to racism and an audience "applauding" her bigotry... that she later felt guilty but just turned the man over to a white lawyer to wash her hands of him is NOT "out of context" when viewing the FULL, UNEDITED section of that episode tells a completely different tale!
Bravo wrote:
Theres nothing to logically explain....the video speaks for itself...just listen to her own words, she admits not doing everything she could have for the man, and turning him over to a "white" lawyer..one of "his own kind" (her words)

:palm: Bravo, you fucking stubborn moron, READ THE MATERIAL! She stated that she INTENDED not to do everything possible....but as she went through the motions, she DID THE OPPOSITE....and the white farmer that is the focus of the story BACKS HER UP! Your denial of this is insipid.
http://www.slate.com/id/2261552
http://www.slate.com/id/2261552/pagenum/2

I defy all nay sayers to CONTINUE to claim Sherrod commited an act of bigotry when the very farmer who is the subject of her story CORROBORATES her story, and COMPLETELY REJECTS the neocon noise machine a'la' Breitbart

Bravo wrote:
Yeah, the farmer was very grateful for her "change of heart"....the change SHE ADMITS to in the video you fool....they never realized she didn't do everything she could have (by her own admission),before she sent them to the white lawyer...

:palm: Bravo, the man stated that he was NEVER treated poorly by her, nor did he get the impression that she was treating him badly. His statement comments on her relating HER STORY REGARDING HER STATE OF MIND. The Farmer, the video, the complete story DOES NOT BACK YOUR REPEATED OUT OF CONTEXT ASSERTIONS.
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/20/...white-farmers/

I defy the nay sayers to explain how Breitbart's own public admissions regarding when and why he ran the video are not admissions to his willing promotion of unchecked material to promote his railings against the NAACP is NOT the most blatant example of convoluted logic going
haha...and I defy anyone to explain why Obamas firing her without knowing the facts is not MORE egregious than Bbarts silly bullshit with the bigots of the naacp....
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...57-503544.html
Click to expand...



bravo said:
.now really....you bore me....you're dismissed.
Click to expand...

Translation: Bravo realizes how idiotic his attempt to refute the final challenge would make him look, so he bluffs and blusters to cover his cop out. That's our intellectually impotent Bravo!
 
Dixie said:
Shut up RETARD!
Click to expand...

You got your ass handed to you on Post 74 and 75, you Dixie Dunce! That's why I've been ignoring your previously disproved post regurgitations of your SOS!.

Seems you just can't stand being bested, so now you've sunk to being a lapdog bitch for Bravo...who's sort of a dumber version of you! I guess post #86 was just too much for your fevered brow to handle!

Well bunky, your barking got my attention only to laugh at the latest "brilliance" of your latest response.

You're done, my Dixie dunce. I'll see you around, and leave you to voice your last predictable lie/repetition/bullshit.
 
Dixie said:
Shut up RETARD!
Click to expand...

Poor Dixie....getting his ass kicked on Post #74 & 75, and then unable to meet the challenge of Post #86 has reduced him to a barking lapdog for Bravo (who's a dumber version of Dixie....if you can believe THAT!).

This latest retort of his is just SO pathetic....but not unexpected. I guess the little dummy didn't understand my ignoring his other regurgitations of his disproved assertion....so I'll just spell it out:


Say goodnight Dixie....shows over for you. See ya next time. You may bark away at the backs of the audience as the curtain closes on you. :D
 
Taichiliberal said:
Poor Dixie....getting his ass kicked on Post #74 & 75, and then unable to meet the challenge of Post #86 has reduced him to a barking lapdog for Bravo (who's a dumber version of Dixie....if you can believe THAT!).

This latest retort of his is just SO pathetic....but not unexpected. I guess the little dummy didn't understand my ignoring his other regurgitations of his disproved assertion....so I'll just spell it out:


Say goodnight Dixie....shows over for you. See ya next time. You may bark away at the backs of the audience as the curtain closes on you. :D
Click to expand...

OH-SHIT, Dixie.
He said "say goodnight"!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top