More left wing bias by CNN, who is now more left than MSNBC: bullet numbers matter

Yaya said:
If you're not, that totally makes sense. I thought the claims that you're a lawyer were false.
Click to expand...

I still don't care. Stop caring about me and start caring about the truth that the right is at war with the media, and its weapon is lies.

Nothing wrong with lots of media choices, everything wrong with lies. Focus.
 
Micawber said:
I still don't care. Stop caring about me and start caring about the truth that the right is at war with the media, and its weapon is lies.

Nothing wrong with lots of media choices, everything wrong with lies. Focus.
Click to expand...

You don't care, yet you still cared enough to claim you're a lawyer.

Dumbass.
 
Yaya said:
You don't care, yet you still cared enough to claim you're a lawyer.

Dumbass.
Click to expand...

I know that you are trying to deflect. Why. Talk about the right wings antipathy for conventional journalism to the point of fact denial.

I have no pressure points available to you and you can't use me to develop any. Discuss issues. Your problem right now is you are on the wrong side of politics on this and you decided to engage someone smarter than you.
 
Micawber said:
I know that you are trying to deflect. Why. Talk about the right wings antipathy for conventional journalism to the point of fact denial.

I have no pressure points available to you and you can't use me to develop any. Discuss issues. Your problem right now is you are on the wrong side of politics on this and you decided to engage someone smarter than you.
Click to expand...

Onceler?
 
Sailor said:
Apparently PackD thinks they should just go up and give them hugs.
Click to expand...

No, I think you should read the article before you write it off as biased if you then care to comment. It is you who are biased, the article was factual and fair. It addressed the rationale for the rounds using reasons provided by the cops.
Feel free not to read sources you think you don't trust, but you look silly spouting off in this case as in most others.
 
Micawber said:
No, I think you should read the article before you write it off as biased if you then care to comment. It is you who are biased, the article was factual and fair. It addressed the rationale for the rounds using reasons provided by the cops.
Feel free not to read sources you think you don't trust, but you look silly spouting off in this case as in most others.
Click to expand...

True but I wondered about that because if a dead man's hand was in play then the cops made a very bad move. Thankfully it wasn't the case, this time.
 
Guille said:
True but I wondered about that because if a dead man's hand was in play then the cops made a very bad move. Thankfully it wasn't the case, this time.
Click to expand...

Are you thinking the excess rounds could have set off the suicide belts, had they been real?
 
evince said:
republicans keep being willingly ear fucked by putin and his fake news
Click to expand...

your lack of vocabulary above that of a 5th grader is becoming your calling card. News flash no one is listening to you anymore because of it.

And on topic, CNN has become the sister station to Entertainment tonight. People watch CNN for the sensationalism, matters little if it's fake news or not.
When your opponent is digging himself a hole, buy him a bigger shovel.
 
Micawber said:
If you feel like bragging, just shut up about me and get on with it. You are an angry grizzled rightee who yells at kids stepping on his lawn. You drive a old ford, have don't tread on me and Trump stickers on your bumper.
You wear a smeared wife beater and have hairy shoulders. You drink Blatz, early and often. Your haggar polyester doubleknits are stretched to the breech. Your belly looks like Cool Hand Luke after 50 eggs. You are venal and have
unsavory personal hygiene. Your dog runs for cover when you enter the house.
Click to expand...

There you go. Lisping again. That really is all you seem to know how to do.
 
Micawber said:
No, I think you should read the article before you write it off as biased if you then care to comment. It is you who are biased, the article was factual and fair. It addressed the rationale for the rounds using reasons provided by the cops.
Feel free not to read sources you think you don't trust, but you look silly spouting off in this case as in most others.
Click to expand...

Like I said wannabe Rambo, what experience do you have to even comment on what happened here? Let me tell you to save me the pain of watching your typical meltdown response. None. Zip. Zilch. Zero. So pipe down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top