More left wing bias by CNN, who is now more left than MSNBC: bullet numbers matter

London police fired 50 rounds to kill 3 attackers

London terror attack: Police fired 'unprecedented' number of rounds

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/04/europe/london-terror-attack-new/index.html

Really, the major headline is the number of bullets used to kill the terrorists and stop them from killing more people.

Really?

They have gone from good ( when they first started in the 80's), to mediocre, to just whining partisan non journalists. Not even worth even looking at even briefly for any reliable news source.
 
London police fired 50 rounds to kill 3 attackers

London terror attack: Police fired 'unprecedented' number of rounds

http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/04/europe/london-terror-attack-new/index.html

Really, the major headline is the number of bullets used to kill the terrorists and stop them from killing more people.

Really?

Yes, really. An innocent man was shot by a cop. So spraying fire is an issue. Duh. The lunatic fringe right has lost the ability to reason. In an urban civilian setting, if not anywhere, there is this thing called "aim."

Look it up. It's in all the literature.
 
Yes, really. An innocent man was shot by a cop. So spraying fire is an issue. Duh. The lunatic fringe right has lost the ability to reason. In an urban civilian setting, if not anywhere, there is this thing called "aim."

Look it up. It's in all the literature.

So tell me there Rambo, how many fire fights you been in? Shut the fuck up.
 
So tell me there Rambo, how many fire fights you been in? Shut the fuck up.

You appear to be an angry miserable person.

Fog of war is a legit issue they should discuss too, but to attack the media, in fact dismissing it in advance, for discussing legitimate issues is more evidence you right wingers have exchanged reason for tribe. Carry on, emotional tribal person. Watch Fox. They do news the way you want it to be, with blinders on.
 
Yes, really. An innocent man was shot by a cop. So spraying fire is an issue. Duh. The lunatic fringe right has lost the ability to reason. In an urban civilian setting, if not anywhere, there is this thing called "aim."

Look it up. It's in all the literature.

Are they saying the cops should shoot less during terrorist attacks?
 
You appear to be an angry miserable person.

Fog of war is a legit issue they should discuss too, but to attack the media, in fact dismissing it in advance, for discussing legitimate issues is more evidence you right wingers have exchanged reason for tribe. Carry on, emotional tribal person. Watch Fox. They do news the way you want it to be, with blinders on.

Quite the contrary. I am and happy and rational. I still noticed you have not answered the question. How many fire fights have you been in to critic a situation like this?
 
Apparently PackD thinks they should just go up and give them hugs.

Pretty sure that wouldn't work lol.

To the OP point, it's typical left wing media reportage to focus on someone-anything besides radical Islam or Muslims. For example, the headline could be about the fact an innocent bystander was a victim of collateral damage.

But NEVER would CNN headline with 'London struck by radical Islamists for second time in a year' even though it's quite factual and coincides with what goes through normal people's brains when they hear of the event.
 
Pretty sure that wouldn't work lol.

To the OP point, it's typical left wing media reportage to focus on someone-anything besides radical Islam or Muslims. For example, the headline could be about the fact an innocent bystander was a victim of collateral damage.

But NEVER would CNN headline with 'London struck by radical Islamists for second time in a year' even though it's quite factual and coincides with what goes through normal people's brains when they hear of the event.
they are too busy ginning up Russian hysteria
 
Are they saying the cops should shoot less during terrorist attacks?

I don't know, I didn't read it. I don't have to in order to notice right wingnuts attack ing subject matter that by its own terms is legit after adding one fact of which I am independently aware.
That impugns their motive completely. If friendly fire shot a citizen, the issue is 100% legit. We get it, they reject conventional everything. Hate everything they perceive as controlling anything.
It's all a scam. It's all a racket. It's all about fucking them over. Got it. Signed sealed and delivered loud and clear. So can they now just die and let me read my New York Times, Harpers and Foreign Affairs?
 
Quite the contrary. I am and happy and rational. I still noticed you have not answered the question. How many fire fights have you been in to critic a situation like this?

If you feel like bragging, just shut up about me and get on with it. You are an angry grizzled rightee who yells at kids stepping on his lawn. You drive a old ford, have don't tread on me and Trump stickers on your bumper.
You wear a smeared wife beater and have hairy shoulders. You drink Blatz, early and often. Your haggar polyester doubleknits are stretched to the breech. Your belly looks like Cool Hand Luke after 50 eggs. You are venal and have
unsavory personal hygiene. Your dog runs for cover when you enter the house.
 
Last edited:
If you feel like bragging, just shut up about me and get on with it. You are an angry grizzled rightee who yells at kids stepping on his lawn. You drive a old ford, have don't tread on me and Trump stickers on your bumper.
You wear a smeared wife beater and have hairy shoulders. You drink Blatz, early and often. Your haggar polyester doubleknits are stretched to the breech. Your belly looks like Cool Hand Luke after 50 eggs. You are venal and have
unsavory personal hygiene. Your dog runs for cover when you enter the house.

Do you claim to be a lawyer?
 
Back
Top