More examples liberal racism?

blackascoal said:
:0)

Save your fake worries dude. I don't require them.

You're engaging in typical right-wing word game nonsense. It's tiring. There is little to ZERO diversity in your all-white party .. almost NONE in its representation.

DEMONSTRATE THAT I'M WRONG.

YOU CAN'T .. so you go off and call liberals any damn thing you want.
:0)
Click to expand...


Yurt's entire debating style is focused on bullshit RighWing word game nonsense...it's the only way he knows how to debate.

He is an absolute master at parsing words and semantics.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Yurt's entire debating style is focused on bullshit RighWing word game nonsense...it's the only way he knows how to debate.

He is an absolute master at parsing words and semantics.
Click to expand...

I'm quite sure his insufferably-boring, bandwidth-wasting bullshit is amusing to himself and the other social misfit trolls here, but it makes for dull reading for everyone else. Thankfully we have a scroll bar... :D
 
Howey said:
What the hell? What's the nutcase accusing me of?
Click to expand...

Remember the wiki posting about how many NBPP members there are? He is now INSISTING that you went in and edited the wiki notation. Gee I wonder why he would assume that?? He said your posting was not what it 'originally' said, so I asked him how were we to know whether or not HE edited the 'original' post before he posted his so-called facts?

I'm still waiting for an answer from him.
 
Bijou said:
Remember the wiki posting about how many NBPP members there are? He is now INSISTING that you went in and edited the wiki notation. Gee I wonder why he would assume that?? He said your posting was not what it 'originally' said, so I asked him how were we to know whether or not HE edited the 'original' post before he posted his so-called facts?

I'm still waiting for an answer from him.
Click to expand...

You can edit wiki entries? Why the hell did he use them as a source? And why the hell is he changing the stuff without basis? Fraud.
 
Howey said:
You can edit wiki entries? Why the hell did he use them as a source? And why the hell is he changing the stuff without basis? Fraud.
Click to expand...

OMG, that's the big joke about using wiki as a source - I thought everyone knew that!

Wikipedia isn't bad to get a general definition of something, but for detailed info - or anything POLITICAL - it's completely unreliable because users can edit the content!
 
Bijou said:
I'm quite sure his insufferably-boring, bandwidth-wasting bullshit is amusing to himself and the other social misfit trolls here, but it makes for dull reading for everyone else. Thankfully we have a scroll bar... :D
Click to expand...

the irony of this post is truly funny
 
howey and bijou are so stupid they actually think people will believe their claim howey didn't alter wiki. if i first edited wiki, how is it a mere hour and change later....howey cites wiki with "hundred" and not "thousands"? it would still have been thousands since they claim i edited it first.

poor idiot liars didn't think this one through.
 
enough said:
howey and bijou are so stupid they actually think people will believe their claim howey didn't alter wiki. if i first edited wiki, how is it a mere hour and change later....howey cites wiki with "hundred" and not "thousands"? it would still have been thousands since they claim i edited it first.

poor idiot liars didn't think this one through.
Click to expand...

?? You're not making sense.
 
Bijou said:
?? You're not making sense.
Click to expand...

what don't you understand? you and howey claim i first edited wiki to say "thousands"...if that was true, then how is it only about an hour later howey cites wiki to say "hundred"? answer - howey edited wiki.

idiot.
 
enough said:
what don't you understand? you and howey claim i first edited wiki to say "thousands"...if that was true, then how is it only about an hour later howey cites wiki to say "hundred"? answer - howey edited wiki.

idiot.
Click to expand...

How do you know wiki didn't throw your 'thousands' bullshit out when you edited it first? They may very well have shit-canned your 'thousands' edit before Howey went to verify your claim. They do review user edits, you know. Not all user-added changes are accepted.
 
Bijou said:
How do you know wiki didn't throw your 'thousands' bullshit out when you edited it first? They may very well have shit-canned your 'thousands' edit before Howey went to verify your claim. They do review user edits, you know. Not all user-added changes are accepted.
Click to expand...

1. i did not edited before howey's edit.

2. go click on the link now and tell me what it says. you just made yourself look like an even bigger idiot.

3. howey's other link shows his claim a hundred is not true. there is no reason for me to edit wiki. you're just being an annoying snot.
 
enough said:
1. i did not edited before howey's edit.

2. go click on the link now and tell me what it says. you just made yourself look like an even bigger idiot.

3. howey's other link shows his claim a hundred is not true. there is no reason for me to edit wiki. you're just being an annoying snot.
Click to expand...

1. Prove that Howey edited it. Prove that you didn't edit it, and that it was changed back once your edit was reviewed and rejected. Good luck with that.

2. No thank you. It doesn't matter what it says. As for who's an idiot, I'd say you win, hands down.

3. See Item 1 and 2.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top