More Drinking Hours, Fewer Accidents

Because they're drunk?


That's a rather nonsensical answer.

I doubt there would be all that many bars that would stay open on a weeknight to that hour anyway. This would mainly affect the weekend but few are going to go all night even then and there is no reason to think they would all leave during whatever morning rush there might be. It's better to have them dispersed over whatever period they happen to choose to leave than creating a rush of drivers at the curfew.
 
They've had this discussion here recently in San Francisco where all bars close at 2 but there has been debate whether they should stay open to 4. The obvious concern, which the above article addresses, is public safety and drunk drivers along with costs. I saw someone in the California state senate is trying to pass a bill that would allow those places that already stay open until 4am but don't serve alcohol past 2am to serve alcohol to 4am.

It would be interesting to see a direct comparison between cities like SF which close at 2am and Chicago and New York which close at 4. I'm all for the staying open later.

That study comes from the University of Lancaster, my son goes there as did I many moons ago.
 
Back
Top