more china horse shit

Schadenfreude

patriot and widower
do you believe this hoseshit

China says wind, solar subsidies WTO compliant​
Associated Press/AP Online

By ELAINE KURTENBACH SHANGHAI - China is defending its subsidies for wind and solar power against a U.S. complaint to the World Trade Organization that such support is unfair, saying its policies are best for fighting climate change.

The relatively mild response by China's Commerce Ministry on Thursday to the U.S. move likely reflects Beijing's desire to keep relations on a positive track in the weeks leading up to Chinese President Hu Jintao's state visit to the U.S., which begins Jan. 19.

"Every country in the world is seeking to develop renewable energy to cope with climate change. China's wind power measures are helping save energy and protect the environment," the Commerce Ministry said in a statement.

"This is crucial for sustainable development and is in accord with WTO principles," it said.
The ministry said China attaches "great importance" to WTO dispute settlement procedures and would reserve its "due rights."

News of the case filed against China at the Geneva-based WTO on Wednesday was awkwardly timed, coming on the same day of the White House's announcement of Hu's visit.

But analysts said despite its recent shows of assertiveness over various issues, Beijing would likely downplay the dispute, which will take months to be resolved.
"I don't see it causing any negative impact on President Hu's visit," said Zhu Feng, a professor specializing in China-U.S. relations at the School of International Studies at Peking University.

"In fact, the state visit will serve as a great channel for the Chinese and U.S. leaders to discuss their political and economic interests, including such disputes," Zhu said.

The two countries are at odds over a slew of trade and diplomatic issues. Beijing was outraged earlier this year by a major U.S. arms sale to Taiwan, while Washington has been upfront about its desire to see Beijing do more to rein its longtime ally North Korea.

The U.S. side has persisted, meanwhile, in pushing for faster changes in currency policies that it contends keeps the Chinese yuan undervalued, swelling the chronic U.S. trade deficit with China.

On Thursday, adding to the wide range of products under dispute, the Commerce Ministry announced it was launching an anti-dumping probe of photographic paper imported from the U.S., the European Union and Japan. The investigation was in response to an industry complaint received on Nov. 8, it said.

Despite those differences, in trade talks last week, the two sides agreed on pledges for improved protection of patents and other intellectual property, reforms of technology innovation policies, and increased access for U.S. beef and poultry exports to China.

China also pledged to remove requirements that Washington says discriminate against U.S. firms competing to build large wind power plants.
Beijing has invested heavily in nurturing its renewable energy sector, building wind farms and subsidizing electricity sold by wind power generators. It recently announced new subsidies for the solar power industry.

The government wants at least 15 percent of China's power to come from renewable energy by 2020, viewing such commitments as a way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit the country's dependence on costly imports of oil and gas.

The WTO case was in response to a United Steelworkers petition last September that alleged Chinese companies can sell wind and solar equipment on international markets at cheaper prices than their competitors because they receive subsidies.

The administration's WTO case alleges that those subsidies violate global trade rules. Such subsidies, said U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk, are "particularly harmful and inherently trade distorting."

The case will first trigger consultations between the two nations. If they fail to resolve the dispute, the WTO will convene a hearing panel.
If the administration wins the case and China does not give up its subsidies, the United States would be authorized to impose penalty tariffs on Chinese products equal to the lost sales that U.S. energy companies are experiencing.

---

Associated Press writer Chris Bodeen and researcher Zhao Liang in Beijing contributed to this report.

A service of YellowBrix, Inc. .
 
Last edited:
I know race mongrelization and destroying white purity is your goal.

But there are other solutions.

Protectionism is what we need. There is no real value to globalization, other than putting corporate profits ahead of all other human concerns.

"...race mongrelization and destroying white purity..."


WTF!!??!!

Get your racists ass out of my America, you fucking skin headed, white power, nazi.
 
I know race mongrelization and destroying white purity is your goal.

But there are other solutions.

Protectionism is what we need. There is no real value to globalization, other than putting corporate profits ahead of all other human concerns.

I am absolutely amazed. White purity??? What about black purity or brown purity or yellow purity.
The Chinese race, for example is much more pure, as a race, than we white people. Perhaps you dont know that.
I honestly did not know that you were a white suprmacist! My goodness.
You witter on and on about protectionism and you have absolutely no idea of what it means. Rather like Hitler's Germany. The weak can only feel strong by making someone else weak. Blame the blacks, blame furriners, blame the jews, blame the guy next door, blame ANYONE but never, NEVER look in a mirror. It is YOU who have failed. You with your ill thought ideas and ignorant conceit.
 
of course china has not racism - sure

China must be one of the very few countries that actually has racism (not in as many words of course), built into its law. Indeed it goes further with the belief, only recently disproved by a Chinese professor, that the Chinese race did not evolve from our common ancestors in Africa. I know many people who will say with total conviction, that the Chinese anatomy differs from the western anatomy (not in the most obvious ways) in so far as diet must be more carefully controlled and that blood can become hot or cold and therefore must receive different diets and medicines. There is no point in denying this, the Chinese do not consider western people sufficiently wise to know.
I have pointed out many times that old ladies in the west also had peculiar ideas of how the human body worked but science and knowledge has shown most, not all, old wives tales to be the products of ancient ignorance.
In the end you smile sweetly and get on with something else. They think they have won so both sides of the debate are happy.
 
The Chinese race, for example is much more pure, as a race, than we white people.
That really depends on how you define things. China is a vast amalgamation of different peoples and so purity is difficult to maintain or establish if you go further into it than simply 'China'. Same for Russia, or America, or anywhere really. Unless you're talking about one of those tribes in the jungle that haven't had contact with anyone who isn't one of them, there has been a pretty significant level of mixing over the past several thousand years. It's how tribes (nations) are formed.
 
Races are irrelevant. Once world goverment is created humans will all be clones. Apart from the face, hair, eyes all humans will be exactly the same once the perfect genetic code is created. Human races will all have to go along with religion and culture. the only thing that will matter will be science. Diversity is weakness, races are unnesscessary and are causing way to many conflicts. The new race of people will have to blue so so long whites, blacks, asians, indians.
 
Races are irrelevant. Once world goverment is created humans will all be clones. Apart from the face, hair, eyes all humans will be exactly the same once the perfect genetic code is created. Human races will all have to go along with religion and culture. the only thing that will matter will be science. Diversity is weakness, races are unnesscessary and are causing way to many conflicts. The new race of people will have to blue so so long whites, blacks, asians, indians.

diversity is weakness? it is perhaps that which makes the human race strongest
 
Races are irrelevant. Once world goverment is created humans will all be clones. Apart from the face, hair, eyes all humans will be exactly the same once the perfect genetic code is created. Human races will all have to go along with religion and culture. the only thing that will matter will be science. Diversity is weakness, races are unnesscessary and are causing way to many conflicts. The new race of people will have to blue so so long whites, blacks, asians, indians.

When all things are the same the slightest change can breed hatred and distrust. If every race is indistinguishable then those who cannot accept their inadequacies will hunt and kill those with red hair, or those who are less than a certain height, or those that bite their nails or speak with an American drawl or those with some other totally illogical perceived difference.
There will always be sufficient difference between men to cause war.
 
China must be one of the very few countries that actually has racism (not in as many words of course), built into its law. Indeed it goes further with the belief, only recently disproved by a Chinese professor, that the Chinese race did not evolve from our common ancestors in Africa. I know many people who will say with total conviction, that the Chinese anatomy differs from the western anatomy (not in the most obvious ways) in so far as diet must be more carefully controlled and that blood can become hot or cold and therefore must receive different diets and medicines. There is no point in denying this, the Chinese do not consider western people sufficiently wise to know.
I have pointed out many times that old ladies in the west also had peculiar ideas of how the human body worked but science and knowledge has shown most, not all, old wives tales to be the products of ancient ignorance.
In the end you smile sweetly and get on with something else. They think they have won so both sides of the debate are happy.

Wrong.

Here in america we have codified discrimination against white males built into the law. Its called affirmative action programs.
 
Wrong.

Here in america we have codified discrimination against white males built into the law. Its called affirmative action programs.

Sorry AH. I should have explained. The phrase 'one of the very few' does not suggest in any way a uniqueness. It simply means that it is in the minority. Hope that clears up any misunderstanding. Do ask if you do not fully understand, won't you?
 
Back
Top