More bad news for the left

domer76 said:
I gave you the real life facts, Festus. You’re just too fucking stupid to comprehend them.

Hey, “Christian” cocksucker, I see you’re still running away from those birth narratives. What’s wrong, cunt? Two choices overwhelms your pissant little brain? LOL
Click to expand...

lol dumbdomer has nothing again.
 
Another stupid thread. Do conservatives only breed conservatives? Of course not. Some liberals have kids who go conservative and even Trumpian.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
You hate being proven wrong - but you're never right - so you live in constant rage....
Click to expand...
He's upset because he's faggot party and faggots are losing. He even knows that's why he's upset. How did he think something that depends on a controlled substance to reproduce would be the sure bet? People who not even wont do their own work but also wont fight their own civil war.

Catholics: self hating gays
Gays: self hating catholics

It's a two faced eunuch generating scam ment for shifting blame as necessary.

Eunuchs have one of two choices to to their un-humanity.
1). Think they're better and more holy.
2). Face the fact they're irrevocably un-human

Which do they predictably choose, every single time?

Now you understand catholics and faggots

nambla.org
 
Land Barge said:
As a progressive ( I assume you are based on your handle) I’d be interested in your thoughts as to why progressives in developed countries have a significantly lower birth rate than conservatives.
Click to expand...
I'm an INDEPENDENT voter...have been registered as such since I was 18 (a LONG time ago). So I've always been "liberal" and "progressive" and "PRACTICAL" long before the current labels.

Now I've already put documented doubt to your first source claims. But rather than admit that, you merely move to yet another dubious claim of which you offer NO valid proof.

That's the problem with you MAGA jokers .... all headlines but no story. Carry on.
 
LichGold said:
Can be.
Click to expand...
Now you're just being insipidly stubborn and silly a'la John Cleese in the Monty Python sketch regarding paying for argument lessons. So unless you've got something serious and of worth to offer, I'll let you have the last word and move on.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Now you're just being insipidly stubborn and silly a'la John Cleese in the Monty Python sketch regarding paying for argument lessons. So unless you've got something serious and of worth to offer, I'll let you have the last word and move on.
Click to expand...
You can have suspicions strong enough to become operational assumptions.
 
zymurgy said:
what difference do facts and logic make?

"derp derp"
Click to expand...
Since you asked:

A 'fact' is simply an assumed predicate. It is NOT a Universal Truth. It is NOT a proof. The moment that predicate is challenged by someone in a conversation, it is no longer a fact. It is an argument.

'Logic' is a closed functional system, similar to mathematics, and has the power of the formal proof and the power of prediction that comes with it. It's notation has evolved over the years, now typically using ASCII like notation in representing it's equations, since most programming languages incorporate logic in their structure. Two main divisions in logic are combinatorial logic and set logic. As in mathematics, it is possible to conduct errors. Logic errors are called 'fallacies'.

Among the axioms forming the logic system is the Identity Axiom, which states ?A->A. In other words, If A exists, it therefore exists. Often described as "I think, therefore I am". This axiom creates the element A and allows it to exist as an element in logic.


The difference between 'fact' and 'logic' is therefore quite wide.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top