More bad news for the left

Land Barge said:
Birthrates among progressives are declining much faster than birthrates among conservatives in America and elsewhere in the developed world. As recently as the 1980s, conservatives and progressives were about equally likely to have kids, but now there’s a widening gap, with fewer and fewer left-of-center people reproducing — almost as though a spirit of pessimism is encouraging the left to cede the future to conservatism.
Click to expand...
Did you see the word Opinion in the URL that you provided??????
 
Into the Night said:
Not quite. This old definition was actually once used to 'prove a religion'.
Science is just a set of falsifiable theories. It is not a 'method' or 'procedure'. It is not a 'discovery'. A theory of science is the ONLY supporting evidence of that theory. You cannot prove any theory True, but you CAN prove a theory of science False.

To the Left, 'science' is a magick word, often used to mean 'proof' or 'Universal Truth'.
Like the word 'fact', redefined by the Left mean the same thing.

The Left often uses government agencies, titles, universities, some book, paper, website, magazine, or some other such nonsense as 'science' or a 'Universal Truth'.

Hence, their various religions, which I have given names to:
* The Church of Green.
* The Church of the Ozone Hole.
* The Church of Global Warming.
* The Church of the EV.
* The Church of Covid.
* The Church of Hate.
* The Church of Deviancy.
* The Church of No God.
* The Church of Karl Marx.


Science says only what it's collection of theories says. Nothing more.

A theory of science can come from anywhere, even from watching an episode of Sponge Bob. The key is that the theory MUST be falsifiable. It is the very definition of science. As long as the theory can withstand specific tests designed to destroy it, it remains part of the body of science. This is automatic. No one has to vote on it or 'bless' it in any way.
Click to expand...

While you are correct that a scientific theory must be falsifiable (hence AGW is NOT a scientific theory)


Science, any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general truths or the operations of fundamental laws.
 
AProudLefty said:
The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained.

Any more questions?
Click to expand...
So you can see how ignorant your rambling is.

"The systematic study" can say nothing - it is a process - not a conclusion. Are you smart enough to be embarrassed?
 
AProudLefty said:
The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained.

Any more questions?
Click to expand...
Science is not a 'study', 'experiment', or 'observation'.

ALL observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top