Mitt Romney, John Kasich ...No Moore

me thinks you and thing lack basic comprehension skills
You are saying sex with underaged children is a minor offense, I think that is pretty disgusting. Underaged means below the age of consent.

Sex with an underaged child is rape, even with consent because legally a child can not give consent.
 
Yep, now we have the alt-right and neo-confederate part of the party. Plus our token Russian, so as not to make you feel excluded.
"neo-confederate" love it. you got a bad case of Civil war fever.
The alt-right is fine by me when it comes to economic nationalism. it's the way of the world

Globalists leached our jobs / necons did our interventionism and caused the blowback in Iraq and Libya.
Good riddance
 
You are saying sex with underaged children is a minor offense, I think that is pretty disgusting. Underaged means below the age of consent.

Sex with an underaged child is rape, even with consent because legally a child can not give consent.
not what I said at all. I said it's a minors violation ( as in age of consent). I am paying marginal attention to this.
The accusers said there was sexual petting- but i'm not all all convinced of that.

However in combination with Moore's' poor memory' of dating minors? -
that fits a preponderance of the evidence,and it's enough for me to want him out
 
"neo-confederate" love it. you got a bad case of Civil war fever.
The alt-right is fine by me when it comes to economic nationalism. it's the way of the world

Globalists leached our jobs / necons did our interventionism and caused the blowback in Iraq and Libya.
Good riddance

Anyone dumb enough to believe that the Confederate cause was nobler than the American cause is not going to be good for your long-term economic interests.
 
not what I said at all. I said it's a minors violation ( as in age of consent). I am paying marginal attention to this.
The accusers said there was sexual petting- but i'm not all all convinced of that.

However in combination with Moore's' poor memory' of dating minors? -
that fits a preponderance of the evidence,and it's enough for me to want him out
That is not what you wrote, perhaps you should learn to better express yourself. You should have said legal age or age of consent, you wrote underaged

un·der·age
ˌəndərˈāj/
adjective

  • (of a person) too young to engage legally in a particular activity, especially drinking alcohol or having sex.


    • (of an activity) engaged in by people who are underage.
      [COLOR=#878787 !important]"underage drinking"






[/COLOR]
 
dating underage is not "pedophilia" -it'sa minors violation if there was sex,if not it's not even that.

However this is a new twist, and I think he should be called on to resign. But there is no way to make that happen

OMG
You must be joking.
This is the face of the alt right folks.
Sex acts with a minor (child) are no big deal.
 
OMG
You must be joking.
This is the face of the alt right folks.
Sex acts with a minor (child) are no big deal.
another one that cannot read..although this is nothing new for you.

Dating a minor is NOT pedophilia. Having sex with a minor is a violation of the law.

where did I say sex acts with minors is "no big deal? -you are incredible stupid. Reading is is fundamental
 
Two Republican senators, Mike Lee of Utah and Steve Daines of Montana, rescinded their recent endorsements on Friday of Alabama Republican Senate nominee Roy Moore, who is embroiled in a controversy over his alleged past relationships with teenage girls.

"Having read the detailed description of the incidents, as well as the response from Judge Moore and his campaign, I can no longer endorse his candidacy for the US Senate," Lee tweeted late Friday.

Daines tweeted a similar message soon after: "I am pulling my endorsement and support for Roy Moore for U.S. Senate."

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/10/republicans-pull-endorsements-of-roy-moore-after-he-admits-to-multiple-relationships-with-teens.html
 
Republicans Try to Block Moore’s Path as Candidate Denies Sexual Misconduct



WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans scrambled on Friday to find a way to block Roy S. Moore’s path to the Senate, exploring extraordinary measures to rid themselves of their own nominee in Alabama after accusations emerged that he had made sexual advances on four teenage girls when he was in his 30s.

Mr. Moore, meanwhile, remained defiant, insisting in a radio interview with Sean Hannity that he would stay in the race. He told Mr. Hannity, the Fox News host, who has endorsed Mr. Moore’s candidacy, that he “never had any contact” with Leigh Corfman, the woman who told The Washington Post that Mr. Moore touched her sexually when she was 14, though he did not deny dating some teenagers.

“I have never known this woman, or anything,” said Mr. Moore, who described the accusations as “politically motivated.”

Republican senators and their advisers, in a flurry of phone calls, emails and text messages, discussed fielding a write-in candidate, pushing Alabama’s governor to delay the Dec. 12 special election or even not seating Mr. Moore at all should he be elected. In an interview, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, declined to say whether he would agree to seat Mr. Moore should he win. Mr. McConnell deferred a question about a possible write-in campaign by Senator Luther Strange, the current occupant of the seat, to Mr. Strange.

The Senate Republican campaign arm, which Mr. McConnell effectively oversees, withdrew Friday from a joint fund-raising agreement with Mr. Moore’s campaign. And Senators Mike Lee of Utah and Steve Daines of Montana rescinded their endorsements of the candidate.

Continue reading the main story
The frenzy reflected not just the worry over the Senate seat once held by Jeff Sessions, now the attorney general, but also the broader danger of the Republican Party’s being associated with Mr. Moore.

If Doug Jones, the Democratic nominee, wins next month, Mr. McConnell’s majority will shrink to one, possibly imperiling the Republican push to overhaul the tax code and most everything else that lawmakers are aiming to do to reverse their spiral before the midterm elections. It could also raise at least the potential that Democrats could seize control of the Senate in 2018, by holding all of their endangered seats and winning Republican seats in Nevada and Arizona.

But if Mr. Moore wins, the party faces a potentially more untenable prospect: welcoming a child-molesting suspect into their ranks, a move that every Republican candidate would have to answer for. That raised memories of Todd Akin, the Republican Senate candidate who in 2012 said victims of “legitimate rape” rarely got pregnant, an assertion that Democrats hung around every candidate that year.

And Mr. Moore’s interview within the sympathetic confines of Mr. Hannity’s show, which was also an initial safe harbor for Mr. Akin in 2012, made Republicans in the capital only more determined that he had to step aside.

“I don’t remember ever dating any girl without the permission of her mother,” Mr. Moore told Mr. Hannity. Asked by Mr. Hannity if he ever dated teenagers when he was in his 30s, Mr. Moore equivocated, replying, “Not generally, no.”

Some Senate Republicans have encouraged Mr. Strange — who lost to Mr. Moore in a bitterly contested Republican runoff election in September — to run as a write-in candidate, an option Mr. Strange is considering, according to Republicans who have spoken with him. But some Republicans believe he would do little more than play spoiler, ensuring either that Mr. Moore is elected by taking votes Mr. Jones would otherwise get or that the Democrat wins by siphoning support from Mr. Moore among Republicans seeking a palatable third option.

Mr. McConnell and Senator Cory Gardner of Colorado, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, spoke with Mr. Strange about the prospect immediately after the Moore news broke on Thursday, according to Republicans familiar with the conversation. And Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who won re-election in 2010 as a write-in candidate, was planning to discuss logistics with Mr. Strange this weekend.

Asked Friday if he thought Mr. Strange should run as a write-in candidate, Mr. McConnell said only that “you’d have to ask Luther what his intentions are, given this development.”

Republicans in Washington and Alabama have also approached other potential candidates about a write-in effort, including Representative Robert B. Aderholt, a mainstream conservative from northern Alabama. But it is unclear that any prominent Republican will be willing to mount a wild-card campaign for the Senate unless Mr. Moore stands down first.

Absent Mr. Moore’s cooperation, Republicans in Washington have conferred with election lawyers to explore other long-shot options for replacing or marginalizing him, several of which would probably lead to a clash in court with Mr. Moore and his supporters.

One approach that Republicans are considering, according to people briefed on the deliberations, would involve asking Gov. Kay Ivey to order a new date for the election — sometime early next year — and giving the party time to ease Mr. Moore from the race.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/10/us/politics/roy-moore-alabama-republican.html

Smart republicans know when it's time to disassociate themselves from a child molester...
Then there is most of the rest of the GrOPe...
 
not what I said at all. I said it's a minors violation ( as in age of consent). I am paying marginal attention to this.
The accusers said there was sexual petting- but i'm not all all convinced of that.

However in combination with Moore's' poor memory' of dating minors? -
that fits a preponderance of the evidence,and it's enough for me to want him out

backpedal faster scumbag, you can't get away from this one as the next post will clearly show.
 
backpedal faster scumbag, you can't get away from this one as the next post will clearly show.

fucking dolt..if I had a nickle for every time you warned me you were going to show me up/

I'm still LMAO from DCJ where you warned me you were going to pick apart my foreign policy analysis. :awesome:
 
dating underage is not "pedophilia" -it'sa minors violation if there was sex,if not it's not even that.
it is abundantly clear from your use of "it's not even that" you consider statuary rape a minor issue.
Now spin away Rene as you are wont to do but your attitude is abundantly clear and you will not spin it otherwise regardless of how much you lie.

Futhermore, BITCH, when I devastated your BULLSHIT on DCJ you just deleted my posts. You fucking liar.
 
Back
Top