MIT Researchers slam Climate Data In New Report

Micawber said:
How so? Go ahead, lay the thread bare, let's see if we can follow along. Dummy.
Click to expand...

We? We??? Either you are a French fuck (which would explain a lot) or you are just referring to your many personalities there Sybil. Either way, thay are all racist.
 
Sailor said:
And that diminishes the study by M.I.T. how?
Click to expand...

Bunches? But I'm surprised he didn't use the other claim by them. The entire study is debunked here:

http://www.snopes.com/climatology-fraud-global-warming/

Breitbart here lowers the bar for what passes as both “peer-reviewed” and a “study”. This report, published on a WordPress blog run by co-author Joseph D’Aleo — a meteorologist who did not complete a PhD, but who prominently advertises his honorary doctorate on the document’s cover page — is not published in a scientific journal.

Additionally, this study is not (as implied by some coverage) an official publication of the Cato Institute, despite the fact that co-author Craig Idso is an adjunct scientist there. “This study was not published by the Cato Institute,” a representative of the libertarian think tank told us.

The claim of peer review, widely reported by numerous outlets, evidently stems from the second page of the report, in which the names of seven scientists (spanning a wide range of fields including aerospace engineering and economics, despite a complete lack of discussion of these topics in the report) appear under the banner “The Undersigned Agree with the Conclusions of this Report”.
Click to expand...

Reading a study and saying that you agree with its conclusions is not how peer review works. A formal peer-review is a structured process that by nature requires a third party, usually a journal editor, who oversees an iterative process of critiques and revisions.

Given the fact that this study is not published in a journal but on a WordPress blog...
Click to expand...
 
The jig is up. The global warming scam has been forever exposed. Give it up. Nobody cares


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Former Chief Economist of Amoco Corp. and Exxon Venezuela
Advisory Board of the Gas Technology Institute and Energy Intelligence Group
 
Cadillac Man said:
Bunches? But I'm surprised he didn't use the other claim by them. The entire study is debunked here:

http://www.snopes.com/climatology-fraud-global-warming/
Click to expand...

That's already been posted, Snopes should stick to politics this is nothing but a straight up hatchet job. No climate alarmists want to explain why the surface temperature record is so at odds with the satellite record. There is absolutely no reason to surface temperature data anymore, especially using data from ship's water intakes and climate model derived extrapolations aka guesses.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top