Missouri students and protesters show how ignorant they are...

The protesters we lauded at nausium on ESPN
Lol at reverse racism racist

1240325433_old-dude-bong-smoking.gif
 
Jesus freak
The story was a university president resigned because of the football team boycott

Religion is infantile
Like you
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Once again, your willful ignorance and general stupidity surpasses itself, Nova. I and others have DOCUMENTED THE SWASTIKA incident, and I've supported no lies or made excuses, if you learned how to read you would know that. That you deny it is irrelevant, just like your opinion. Once again, you prove to be the dumbest "conservative" SOB on these boards, Nova. Not surprising.

Hate to bust your bubble


http://is.gd/ocFFfn poop swastika.....MIZZOU......alleged in Oct. 2015

https://redd.it/2mzex7 ----- reported in Nov. 2014....... ONE year earlier...
http://i.imgur.com/YHKoHAP.jpg ---- exact picture from 2014

here bubble brain, learn to do some proper research: http://www.themaneater.com/stories/2015/4/13/mu-officials-investigate-anti-semitic-writing-resi/

like this: http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/11/here-is-the-police-report-from-the-mizzou-poop-swastika-incident/
 

University of Missouri released photos of the incident, as well as previously unreported details about an incident the prior week in which a student hurled racial slurs at a white resident of the same dorm.


Yet the photo of the SWASTIKA was posted on another website one year earlier..THE EXACT SAME PHOTO...have a hard time dealing with that FACT, pinhead ?

You've been pwned, laddie....you're gonna have to pedal your bullshit elsewhere...

“On Saturday, October 24th, at 2:00am an individual came into one of the restrooms in Gateway Hall and drew a swastika on the wall with their own feces,” Donley wrote in a letter several days after the alleged incident. “This event happened while many students, including myself, were already asleep.” Later in his letter, Donley noted that he only founded [sic] out about the alleged vandalism incident “via a flyer posted on the walls” of the dorm. Although Donley did not respond to repeated requests for comment prior to publication, The Federalist spoke with two RHA staffers while trying to get in touch with Donley. Neither had personally witnessed the poop swastika. When asked if there was any photographic evidence of the alleged incident, one staffer replied, “Not to my knowledge.” Frankie Minor, the director of residential life at Mizzou, did not respond to repeated requests for comment on whether he personally saw the poop swastika or any photographic evidence of it. The Federalist also attempted to contact Christian Basi, the associate director of the University of Missouri News Bureau, who previously told the Columbia Missourian on Oct. 30 that the incident had been immediately reported to Mizzou police. Basi did not respond to requests for comment prior to the publication of this article. Calls to the University of Missouri Police Department, which responded to and investigated the alleged poop swastika incident, also failed to yield any evidence of the poopstika. Multiple activists on Twitter pointed to this photo as proof that the incident occurred as reported, but a Google search for the same image shows that it has been floating around the Internet for nearly a year. A reddit thread from November of 2014 appears to contain the earliest publication of the photo in question, meaning that it most certainly does not constitute proof of the incident alleged to have occurred at Mizzou on October 24, 2015. Maj. Brian Weimer, the public information officer for the Mizzou police department, told The Federalist that he also did not personally see the poop swastika that was reported to police. When asked if anyone in the police department personally witnessed the swastika, Maj. Weimer clammed up and referred all questions about the incident to the university’s custodian of public records.

Think about that for a moment:

Not a newsworthy event happens anymore, no matter how fleeting, without its being captured by the camera capabilities of ubiquitous cell phones. Here, the images would have made for invaluable grievance industry publicity. I daresay the New York Times and NBC would have run them more regularly than the Abu Ghraib photos. Moreover, if vandalism actually occurred as alleged in this instance, it would be grounds for prosecution. Therefore, the crime scene would have been preserved for hours, and thus available for taking pictures and video, while investigators did their forensic work. There would be police reports, file photos, preservation of the physical dung, and witness statements. There would be persons of interest identified and, since we’re talking about something that happened a couple of weeks ago, quite likely an arrest by now. Yet, at this point … we have nothing.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/426879/hey-mizzou-wheres-poop-andrew-c-mccarthy
 
University of Missouri released photos of the incident, as well as previously unreported details about an incident the prior week in which a student hurled racial slurs at a white resident of the same dorm.


Yet the photo of the SWASTIKA was posted on another website one year earlier..THE EXACT SAME PHOTO...have a hard time dealing with that FACT, pinhead ?

You've been pwned, laddie....you're gonna have to pedal your bullshit elsewhere...

“On Saturday, October 24th, at 2:00am an individual came into one of the restrooms in Gateway Hall and drew a swastika on the wall with their own feces,” Donley wrote in a letter several days after the alleged incident. “This event happened while many students, including myself, were already asleep.” Later in his letter, Donley noted that he only founded [sic] out about the alleged vandalism incident “via a flyer posted on the walls” of the dorm. Although Donley did not respond to repeated requests for comment prior to publication, The Federalist spoke with two RHA staffers while trying to get in touch with Donley. Neither had personally witnessed the poop swastika. When asked if there was any photographic evidence of the alleged incident, one staffer replied, “Not to my knowledge.” Frankie Minor, the director of residential life at Mizzou, did not respond to repeated requests for comment on whether he personally saw the poop swastika or any photographic evidence of it. The Federalist also attempted to contact Christian Basi, the associate director of the University of Missouri News Bureau, who previously told the Columbia Missourian on Oct. 30 that the incident had been immediately reported to Mizzou police. Basi did not respond to requests for comment prior to the publication of this article. Calls to the University of Missouri Police Department, which responded to and investigated the alleged poop swastika incident, also failed to yield any evidence of the poopstika. Multiple activists on Twitter pointed to this photo as proof that the incident occurred as reported, but a Google search for the same image shows that it has been floating around the Internet for nearly a year. A reddit thread from November of 2014 appears to contain the earliest publication of the photo in question, meaning that it most certainly does not constitute proof of the incident alleged to have occurred at Mizzou on October 24, 2015. Maj. Brian Weimer, the public information officer for the Mizzou police department, told The Federalist that he also did not personally see the poop swastika that was reported to police. When asked if anyone in the police department personally witnessed the swastika, Maj. Weimer clammed up and referred all questions about the incident to the university’s custodian of public records.

Think about that for a moment:

Not a newsworthy event happens anymore, no matter how fleeting, without its being captured by the camera capabilities of ubiquitous cell phones. Here, the images would have made for invaluable grievance industry publicity. I daresay the New York Times and NBC would have run them more regularly than the Abu Ghraib photos. Moreover, if vandalism actually occurred as alleged in this instance, it would be grounds for prosecution. Therefore, the crime scene would have been preserved for hours, and thus available for taking pictures and video, while investigators did their forensic work. There would be police reports, file photos, preservation of the physical dung, and witness statements. There would be persons of interest identified and, since we’re talking about something that happened a couple of weeks ago, quite likely an arrest by now. Yet, at this point … we have nothing.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/426879/hey-mizzou-wheres-poop-andrew-c-mccarthy

Don't forget that DNA analysis coukd have told us whether it was white poo or black poo. I knew all along this story was fishy. But like man made global warming, the lefties want to believe it
 
This one are you a dues payer

Since you have been to this Klan meeting, you have been to more than me. The Klan are a bunch of sissy cowards. ZOMG, a black person, ZOMG, a Jewish person, run for the hills pale faces, we gots differaint folks amongz us. I am surprised they don't wear black sheets, so no one can tell when they shit themselves.
 
University of Missouri released photos of the incident, as well as previously unreported details about an incident the prior week in which a student hurled racial slurs at a white resident of the same dorm.


Yet the photo of the SWASTIKA was posted on another website one year earlier..THE EXACT SAME PHOTO...have a hard time dealing with that FACT, pinhead ?

You've been pwned, laddie....you're gonna have to pedal your bullshit elsewhere...

“On Saturday, October 24th, at 2:00am an individual came into one of the restrooms in Gateway Hall and drew a swastika on the wall with their own feces,” Donley wrote in a letter several days after the alleged incident. “This event happened while many students, including myself, were already asleep.” Later in his letter, Donley noted that he only founded [sic] out about the alleged vandalism incident “via a flyer posted on the walls” of the dorm. Although Donley did not respond to repeated requests for comment prior to publication, The Federalist spoke with two RHA staffers while trying to get in touch with Donley. Neither had personally witnessed the poop swastika. When asked if there was any photographic evidence of the alleged incident, one staffer replied, “Not to my knowledge.” Frankie Minor, the director of residential life at Mizzou, did not respond to repeated requests for comment on whether he personally saw the poop swastika or any photographic evidence of it. The Federalist also attempted to contact Christian Basi, the associate director of the University of Missouri News Bureau, who previously told the Columbia Missourian on Oct. 30 that the incident had been immediately reported to Mizzou police. Basi did not respond to requests for comment prior to the publication of this article. Calls to the University of Missouri Police Department, which responded to and investigated the alleged poop swastika incident, also failed to yield any evidence of the poopstika. Multiple activists on Twitter pointed to this photo as proof that the incident occurred as reported, but a Google search for the same image shows that it has been floating around the Internet for nearly a year. A reddit thread from November of 2014 appears to contain the earliest publication of the photo in question, meaning that it most certainly does not constitute proof of the incident alleged to have occurred at Mizzou on October 24, 2015. Maj. Brian Weimer, the public information officer for the Mizzou police department, told The Federalist that he also did not personally see the poop swastika that was reported to police. When asked if anyone in the police department personally witnessed the swastika, Maj. Weimer clammed up and referred all questions about the incident to the university’s custodian of public records.

Think about that for a moment:

Not a newsworthy event happens anymore, no matter how fleeting, without its being captured by the camera capabilities of ubiquitous cell phones. Here, the images would have made for invaluable grievance industry publicity. I daresay the New York Times and NBC would have run them more regularly than the Abu Ghraib photos. Moreover, if vandalism actually occurred as alleged in this instance, it would be grounds for prosecution. Therefore, the crime scene would have been preserved for hours, and thus available for taking pictures and video, while investigators did their forensic work. There would be police reports, file photos, preservation of the physical dung, and witness statements. There would be persons of interest identified and, since we’re talking about something that happened a couple of weeks ago, quite likely an arrest by now. Yet, at this point … we have nothing.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/426879/hey-mizzou-wheres-poop-andrew-c-mccarthy

And when all is said and done, Nova offers yet ANOTHER compilation of op-ed insinuations, supposition and conjecture from right wing rags that in the end ACCUSES THE MIZZOU POLICE OF LYING ABOUT THE INCIDENT. Someone wake this dope up and explain to him that what the National Review should have happened is NOT sacred law from the mount on high. But this has already been addressed:


http://www.politifact.com/missouri/...ri-politician-wrongly-claims-zero-evidence-s/

And here Slate specifically takes the National Review to task:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat..._the_feces_swastika_at_mizzou_was_a_hoax.html

But Nova and his ilk BELIEVE what they want to, and ignore all else. Sad, but not unexpected.
 
Back
Top