Merrick Garland testifies, faces questions on Hunter Biden, Trump trials

archives said:
No he didn’t, in fact he explained the misinformation several of the GOP talking points are based upon

Bigger take away is how Jordan lost control of the hearings on several occasions, best being one when he exited the room while Swalwell was showing a graphic of how many days Jordan himself ignored a Congressional subpoena. That and Gaetz insisting on yes and no answers only and then concluding Garland was lying cause he wouldn’t say yeas or no

These Hearings are for show only, all the Freedom idiots were only after their one minute clip Fox could run in rotation
Click to expand...

I'll check them out ...I'm still glad he's not on the Supreme Court after what I've observed and have learned about him... I think these hearings are very informative...
 
archives said:
No he didn’t, in fact he explained the misinformation several of the GOP talking points are based upon

Bigger take away is how Jordan lost control of the hearings on several occasions, best being one when he exited the room while Swalwell was showing a graphic of how many days Jordan himself ignored a Congressional subpoena. That and Gaetz insisting on yes and no answers only and then concluding Garland was lying cause he wouldn’t say yeas or no

These Hearings are for show only, all the Freedom idiots were only after their one minute clip Fox could run in rotation
Click to expand...

So, the Democrats are trying a tu quoque defense for their lying corrupt officials are they?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
More like Merrick Garland, stammers, dissembles, obfuscates, and tries every weasel trick in the book to not answer questions about this because he's up to his eyeballs in the corruption himself...
Click to expand...

Do you guys just say stuff? Oh, that guy - he's corrupt! Do you know what "corrupt" means? Do you have ANY concrete evidence whatsoever that Garland has acted in any manner that would qualify as corrupt or even border on it? Any facts, any texts, any conversations, any reporting - anything at all?
 
BidenPresident said:
In nearly three hours of testimony so far by Attorney General Merrick Garland before the House Judiciary Committee, the divide between Democratic and Republican lawmakers on a range of issues has proved stark. The session — contentious at times — centered on some of the Justice Department’s most politically charged cases, including special counsel David Weiss’s investigation into President Biden’s son Hunter. “Mr. Weiss has made his … decisions, and Mr. Weiss is an experienced federal prosecutor with extensive experience and with sufficient credibility to be appointed by President Trump,” Garland said. “I just have no grounds for interfering here.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...d-attorney-general-testimony-house-judiciary/
Click to expand...
The Trumpublicans are awful at this. The all ask the same question. They all make the same point. They all lie.
 
BartenderElite said:
Do you guys just say stuff? Oh, that guy - he's corrupt! Do you know what "corrupt" means? Do you have ANY concrete evidence whatsoever that Garland has acted in any manner that would qualify as corrupt or even border on it? Any facts, any texts, any conversations, any reporting - anything at all?
Click to expand...

The totality of Garland's posts: GOP good. Democrats bad.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
More like Merrick Garland, stammers, dissembles, obfuscates, and tries every weasel trick in the book to not answer questions about this because he's up to his eyeballs in the corruption himself...
Click to expand...

That is just what the rogue Republican Congressmen want you to think DUMMY!.

That is why they asked the same question again and again over 50 times, knowing that the AG could not answer questions regarding OPEN JUSTICE DEPARTMENT CASES, or answering questions regarding Deliberations between Justice Department officials that are internal to the Justice Department.

It was to deceive malevolent people like you into believing that the AG was avoiding answering their questions. And just like a snail-skulled little rabbit, you sucked it all in like a hog slurping a trough!

It would be like putting the president in the hot seat, while 25 congressmen take turns asking the president what the Nuclear Codes are 100 times- WHEN THEY DAMN WELL KNOW HE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION!

ANY Reasonable person with any sense of reality and comprehension would easily understand this!

True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us "normal" people take for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering. But we sometimes forget that there are "challenged" persons in this world who find these things more difficult. I wish you the best of luck with your emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a demand on you.
 
Last edited:
Garland did extremely well in the face of the clown show run by Jim Jordan. I doubt I could have sat in that chair without saying 'Fuck you, asshole'. His face said it, but he maintained.
 
Phantasmal said:
The Trumpublicans are awful at this. The all ask the same question. They all make the same point. They all lie.
Click to expand...

I just got home and it's over so what lies did I miss? (You do know there's no such thing as a "Trumplican"... that is so silly ...and not smart and witty;))
 
Concart said:
Garland did extremely well in the face of the clown show run by Jim Jordan. I doubt I could have sat in that chair without saying 'Fuck you, asshole'. His face said it, but he maintained.
Click to expand...
I agree, I only heard him raise his voice once, but I haven’t watched the whole thing. I went to lunch with a friend and now I’m exercising on my bike.
 
Concart said:
Garland did extremely well in the face of the clown show run by Jim Jordan. I doubt I could have sat in that chair without saying 'Fuck you, asshole'. His face said it, but he maintained.
Click to expand...

I know right? I would have been more compelled to get up and kick him in the Balls! :rolleyes:
 
Best moment of the hearing, after Jordan or one of his merry band of clowns said they intended to hold Garland in contempt of Congress for some bullshit reason, Eric Swalwell pointed out that Jim Jordan was 500 days into defying a lawfully issued subpoena. I'm sure it did nothing to penetrate the pinhead cult members, but I certainly enjoyed ity.

"If we’re going to talk about contempt of Congress, let’s get real. Are you serious that Jim Jordan, a witness to one of the greatest crimes committed in America, a crime where more prosecutions have occurred than any crime in this country, refuses to help this country, and we’re going to get lectured about subpoena compliance and contempt of Congress? Jim Jordan won’t even honor a lawful subpoena. Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? There’s no credibility on that side."

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/s...empt-of-congress-no-credibility-on-that-side/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top