Media manipulation

Just because you say something is false doesn't mean it is. I see many half truths in your post. Let's take Holder and the New Black Panther Party. Did Holder drop the charges or not?


quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by Alias
When you find me lying then you be sure and expose it. You haven't and you can't. I don't need to lie to beat you and your pals. All I need to do is keep informed and tell the truth. You don't have to lie to make lefties angry, all you need to do is tell the truth about them.

Now tell us what is racist about my avatar.



HEY LYING SHIT-EATER! WHAT DOES MY SIGNATURE LINE SAY?
Do you deny typing that?
Don't forget, before you answer, the mods can tell if you edited your post, which you did.
So, are you going to lie, tell the truth or ignore this post?
If you have any balls at all, you will admit you lied, and be a man about it.

Don't think ignoring it will make it go away, because I will post this after every post you make from now until you admit you are a liar, or the end of days arrives.

Man up whore.​
 
Did it a year or so ago when Topspin challenged me. He lost. Graciously, I should add.

You seem to think someone cares what you "proved" on the internet. That's funny.

TopDope rants about "degrees" and can't spell worth shit. That's funny, too.

Thanks for the laughs.
 
What on Faux is not opinion? Not much.

So are you saying that you are actually trying to mix editorializing with news or that you are incapable of understanding the difference? I just want to know which way you are going with this. Either you are deliberately trying to mislead stupid people, or you are one of the misled.
 
So are you saying that you are actually trying to mix editorializing with news or that you are incapable of understanding the difference? I just want to know which way you are going with this. Either you are deliberately trying to mislead stupid people, or you are one of the misled.

Faux 'news' presents opinion as news or more cleverly - as truth.

"Fox News has responded to White House criticisms of its network by claiming that while its "editorial" programs are filled with "vibrant opinion," its news hours are straight and objective. However, Fox News' purportedly straight news programs echo its "editorial" programs: Media Matters for America has compiled a non-exhaustive list -- from this year alone -- documenting how Fox's news programming features smears, falsehoods, doctored and deceptive editing, and GOP talking point...

Fox News "opinion" programs frequently smear Obama administration with falsehoods. In defending its programming, Fox News has repeatedly pushed the argument that critics are targeting the network for the "vibrant opinion" expressed on shows such as Glenn Beck and Hannity. However, Fox News' "opinion" programs don't simply have a "vibrant opinion" about the Obama administration -- they frequently smear the Obama administration with falsehoods. Fox News' pattern of smearing the Obama administration follows the network's prevalent pattern of smears and misinformation -- on both the network's purported straight news hours and its "opinion" shows -- during the 2008 political campaign..

http://mediamatters.org/research/200910130047

Argument for Fox News
Since the beginning, Fox News has been criticized by the left and accused of being stalwarts for the GOP. However, no matter what one thinks about the political ideology of Fox commentators, one thing is abundantly clear: America trusts them.

Argument against Fox News

"For more than a century, journalists have adhered to an ideal of objectivity — admittedly, one they could never quite live up to. Still, they were intent on serving the public interest by providing objective, factual descriptions of events. Journalists proudly proclaimed that the criticisms and complaints they received from both left and right proved that they were maintaining the correct level of professional detachment and impartiality.

Fox News represents a radical break from this tradition, as it is profoundly partisan in its reporting.
Fox's political bias would not be so damaging if the organization would be honest and up front about the fact that it favors conservatism and the Republication Party. That would be perfectly legitimate.
The problem is that Fox keeps its political agenda hidden and obscured in a manner that blurs the distinction between journalism and overt propaganda. Instead, Fox News presents itself as part of the tradition of objective journalism, claiming that its deliberately biased newscasts somehow represent “fair and balanced” reporting."

http://www.metro.us/newyork/national/article/989925--15-years-of-fox-news

Hey, I'm not the only one who sees thru Faux 'news' and I feel sorry for working people who don't.
 
...Media Matters for America has compiled a non-exhaustive list -- from this year alone -- documenting how Fox's news programming features smears, falsehoods, doctored and deceptive editing, and GOP talking point......

Why not argue that then? The rest of your post simply repeats your prior shit that Damo called you on.
 
Why not argue that then? The rest of your post simply repeats your prior shit that Damo called you on.

My argument is this...
"Fox's political bias would not be so damaging if the organization would be honest and up front about the fact that it favors conservatism and the Republication Party. That would be perfectly legitimate.
The problem is that Fox keeps its political agenda hidden and obscured in a manner that blurs the distinction between journalism and overt propaganda. Instead, Fox News presents itself as part of the tradition of objective journalism, claiming that its deliberately biased newscasts somehow represent “fair and balanced” reporting."

Your ignorance is their strength.
 
My argument is this...
"Fox's political bias would not be so damaging if the organization would be honest and up front about the fact that it favors conservatism and the Republication Party. That would be perfectly legitimate.
The problem is that Fox keeps its political agenda hidden and obscured in a manner that blurs the distinction between journalism and overt propaganda. Instead, Fox News presents itself as part of the tradition of objective journalism, claiming that its deliberately biased newscasts somehow represent “fair and balanced” reporting."

Your ignorance is their strength.

First you say that mediamatters has documented it, then you say that it is "hidden and obscured", I guess so that it can't be documented. Which is it? :)
 
Back
Top