Media and Leftists conclusion: Trump created an affordability crisis

domer76 said:
Quiet, piggy.
One more time, cunt. Presidents do not set fuel prices. Period. They neither “jack up” prices (as one of you fucking morons put it), nor decrease them.

Fuck man. As a group, I have never seen as stupid a set of fucking idiots as you MAGATs. Every fucking one of you is as dumb as a fucking rock.
Click to expand...
STFU, you fucking lying retard.
Here's how "Biden" (his handlers) set inflation in motion. :BKick:
Let me know if you need help with any words there, Bucko. :rolleyes2:
 
Matt Dillon said:
Trump is going to set up a Yuge surplus for America.
IMO, that's his intention, and it looks like he knows how to do it.
It's just nice to have one that isn't working against everybody. Kennedy and uh..Ford weren't that bad.
However, America has had about a half a century of bad presidents and needs to prevent some more shit like that happening in the future.
From Reagan to Trump, all bad. Seriously. And Reagan was undermined by Bush.
Bubba woulda been alright, but he had that woman driving him. So he wasn't, either.
Citizens need to learn about the "CFR" and "ICLEI" and all that. :|
Click to expand...
Odd. In every rating of presidents by professional historians, Trump is right down there at the bottom 2 or 3. GW rated pretty poorly. GHW middle so so. Since Reagan, the Dems have been far superior to the Rs. And everyone since Washington far superior to Jabba the Orange.
 
domer76 said:
Odd. In every rating of presidents by professional historians, Trump is right down there at the bottom 2 or 3. GW rated pretty poorly. GHW middle so so. Since Reagan, the Dems have been far superior to the Rs. And everyone since Washington far superior to Jabba the Orange
Click to expand...
You are an enemy to all Americans, Fuck You.
 
T.O. Goodwin said:
The trillions added under Biden were partly the result of the pandemic, because he inherited a huge deficit and emergency spending programs from the prior Trump administration. Some of that money was already committed before he took office, and more had to be spent to prevent a deeper economic collapse. But it is also true that Biden added several trillion more during his own term through his policies and ongoing federal programs.

By contrast, in Trump’s current term, the level of new debt and spending has already surpassed what Biden added. This increase has happened quickly and has reached several trillion dollars in just the first year. The details involve complex budget math, but the broad picture is straightforward: Trump has now added more new debt in one year than Biden added across multiple years.
Click to expand...
Not to mention that the pandemic-induced supply chain issues were responsible for inflation...and Trump denying COVID was a problem for 6 months didn't help.

Not that any of the MAGAt cracker retards will ever understand these points much less your astute observations. They really are fucking morons and, no doubt a detriment to their families, friends and neighbors.

Those same families, friends and neighbors should start considering Plan B since MAGAt cracker retards are also a detriment to the United States. :flagsal:
 
T.O. Goodwin said:
If what you meant is simply that the first identified cluster of COVID-19 cases appeared in China, then yes—that is historically accurate. The earliest confirmed reports were from Wuhan in late 2019, and that is where global surveillance first detected the outbreak. If the reference to “the Chinese disease lockdown” is only meant to describe the location of the initial cases, then I understand that point and do not dispute the geography of the first reports.

The clarification I offered is not about disputing where the outbreak was first recognized. It is about avoiding language that unintentionally implies national ownership or responsibility for the virus itself. The scientific and public-health communities have examined the origins extensively, and while some uncertainties remain, several core findings are well established enough to correct the broader misconceptions.

First, there is no verified evidence that the Chinese government engineered, manipulated, or intentionally released the virus. Independent genomic analyses by international virologists show that the structure of SARS-CoV-2 is consistent with natural zoonotic spillover—the same biological pattern seen in SARS, MERS, Ebola, and many other outbreaks. A lab-related accident has been examined because Wuhan hosts a major virology institute, but no credible investigation has found proof of deliberate release or engineered design. Both natural spillover and accidental exposure remain scientifically possible; intentional causation does not.

Second, although the first cases were detected in China, the economic and social damage was global. Europe, the United States, India, Africa, South America, and Asia all experienced shutdowns, supply-chain failures, overwhelmed hospitals, labor disruptions, and domestic policy responses. The economic contraction did not come from China alone; it came from the worldwide spread of a virus through interconnected systems.

Third, pandemics do not have national identities. The 1918 influenza likely originated in Kansas. H1N1 emerged in North America. Ebola outbreaks have begun in multiple African regions. Viruses follow ecological and biological pathways, not political borders. Assigning national labels to global pathogens obscures the real structural vulnerabilities—public-health readiness, supply-chain fragility, and economic exposure—that determine how far and how fast a disease spreads.

So the distinction is simple:
• Yes, the first recorded cases were in China.
• No, the virus is not inherently “Chinese.”
• No, there is no verified evidence of intentional release.
• Yes, the consequences were global and driven by global systems.

Keeping the terminology precise prevents unintended implications and keeps the conversation aligned with what the evidence actually supports.

This leads to the related question raised earlier about why Biden added trillions to the deficit—because the fiscal environment he entered was shaped by that same global chain of events.

According to the non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), Biden approved legislation and executive actions with a combined projected cost of roughly $4.7 trillion in new ten-year borrowing during his term. This figure is grounded in recorded legislative scoring, not speculation. The American Rescue Plan alone accounted for approximately $2.06 trillion of that total. Other contributors included the Honoring Our PACT Act, discretionary appropriations, infrastructure legislation, and various supplemental bills. These numbers are all documented in CRFB’s published fiscal analyses.

At the same time, a large share of the fiscal environment Biden inherited came directly from the 2020 pandemic response enacted under the prior administration: roughly $3.5 trillion of emergency spending that carried multi-year obligations forward into 2021 and 2022. Those costs were already baked into the baseline deficit before Biden took office.

In conclusion:
Biden added trillions to the deficit because he approved several major legislative packages—especially the American Rescue Plan—but he also inherited the largest peacetime deficit in U.S. history, driven by emergency pandemic spending and the structural economic damage of the global shutdown. The accurate statement is not that “Biden alone created the deficit,” but that his administration enacted roughly $4.7 trillion in new borrowing on top of an unprecedented fiscal baseline set in motion before he arrived.

This is the factual record, grounded in the public data and the legislative scores that are a matter of record.

This is a situation that Trump, Biden, and now Trump again are inheriting from one another, and it will not end with either of them. The fiscal and economic consequences of the pandemic, the supply-chain collapse, global energy shocks, long-term structural deficits, and the rising cost of an aging population are not the work of a single administration. They will be the responsibility of the next several presidents, regardless of party. This is a hundred-year struggle for stability in a system that has been accumulating structural pressures for decades, and it will take many terms of leadership to square it away. Trump did not ask for the pandemic, but he had to expand the deficit to keep households and businesses afloat. Biden inherited that same emergency baseline and had to operate within it. And the next administrations—Republican or Democratic—will face the same long arc of work, because the problem is larger than any one presidency and larger than any one political moment.
Click to expand...

Now this is some world class gaslighting, replete with long debunked conspiracy theories and outright fabrications.

• Yes, the first recorded cases were in China.

True

• No, the virus is not inherently “Chinese.”

Utterly false. The Covid-19 virus was bio-engineered at the Wuhan Institute of Virology by the Chinese Government with partial funding by the American National Institute of Health, directly appropriated by Anthony Fauci - who ever so coincidentally presented himself as the preeminent expert on the virus he helped create. The Wuhan Designer Virus® is absolutely of Chinese origin, was weaponized using "gain of function" to increase the transmissibility and lethality of the virus.

www.newsweek.com

Fauci 'Untruthful' to Congress About Wuhan Lab Research, Documents Suggest

Newly released grant proposals indicate the National Institutes of Health funded controversial gain of function research—appearing to contradict what Dr. Anthony Fauci told Congress earlier this year.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

reason.com

Anthony Fauci gives misleading, evasive answers about NIH-funded research at Wuhan lab

At a congressional hearing, Anthony Fauci tried to dismiss credible claims that his agency funded gain-of-function research.
reason.com reason.com

• No, there is no verified evidence of intentional release.

Evidence is circumstantial, but overwhelming. In 2018-19 China had a serious problem with their crown jewel, Hong Kong. The elected officials were openly defying Emperor Xi. Protests in the streets against CCP rule were a nightly occurrence. Crackdowns by the CCP were met with resistance at all levels. International coverage was heavy as were threats of sanctions and embargoes by the West. Emperor Xi did not want another Tiananmen Square situation.

A bio-engineered virus out of Wuhan was the answer. Within two weeks of Covid showing up in 2019, Hong Kong was quelled. And this was precisely what Covid-19 was designed to do.



Is there evidence China wanted the Wuhan Designer Virus® to be a global pandemic? No, but frankly they just didn't give a fuck.

• Yes, the consequences were global and driven by global systems.

Again, you are desperately trying to excuse the criminal action of the CCP and Fauci. The Wuhan Designer Virus® is a manmade bug. It's a biological weapon designed to quell, not kill.

The terrifying reality is that it was entirely successful. China is working on more controllable strains as we speak.
 
Last edited:
Althea said:
Drunk posting is a terrible look. The border is not closed.
Click to expand...
So your claim is that Trump has not secured the border?
Is that correct, Fucktardo?
Tbh, you give off vibes of being a government fucktardo shill. True Story.
You are a misinformation spreading sophist bullshit artist is what you are.
If I had a nickel for every lie I've seen you tell, I'd have a dollar.
IMO, that's pretty bad. But you know what they say about opinions, no?
 
How many successfully illegally entered the country the last three months? In the last three months (May–July 2025), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reported historically low illegal entries, with about 24,000–25,000 encounters nationwide per month, and only 4,600–8,700 apprehensions along the southwest border. www.theglobalstatistics.com/border-patrol-statistics-on-illegal-crossings/

Successful escapes into the country are 5 times greater than apprehensions.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Now this is some world class gaslighting, replete with long debunked conspiracy theories and outright fabrications.

• Yes, the first recorded cases were in China.

True

• No, the virus is not inherently “Chinese.”

Utterly false. The Covid-19 virus was bio-engineered at the Wuhan Institute of Virology by the Chinese Government with partial funding by the American National Institute of Health, directly appropriated by Anthony Fauci - who ever so coincidentally presented himself as the preeminent expert on the virus he helped create. The Wuhan Designer Virus® is absolutely of Chinese origin, was weaponized using "gain of function" to increase the transmissibility and lethality of the virus.

www.newsweek.com

Fauci 'Untruthful' to Congress About Wuhan Lab Research, Documents Suggest

Newly released grant proposals indicate the National Institutes of Health funded controversial gain of function research—appearing to contradict what Dr. Anthony Fauci told Congress earlier this year.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

reason.com

Anthony Fauci gives misleading, evasive answers about NIH-funded research at Wuhan lab

At a congressional hearing, Anthony Fauci tried to dismiss credible claims that his agency funded gain-of-function research.
reason.com reason.com

• No, there is no verified evidence of intentional release.

Evidence is circumstantial, but overwhelming. In 2018-19 China had a serious problem with their crown jewel, Hong Kong. The elected officials were openly defying Emperor Xi. Protests in the streets against CCP rule were a nightly occurrence. Crackdowns by the CCP were met with resistance at all levels. International coverage was heavy as were threats of sanctions and embargoes by the West. Emperor Xi did not want another Tiananmen Square situation.

A bio-engineered virus out of Wuhan was the answer. Within two weeks of Covid showing up in 2019, Hong Kong was quelled. And this was precisely what Covid-19 was designed to do.



Is there evidence China wanted the Wuhan Designer Virus® to be a global pandemic? No, but frankly they just didn't give a fuck.

• Yes, the consequences were global and driven by global systems.

Again, you are desperately trying to excuse the criminal action of the CCP and Fauci. The Wuhan Designer Virus® is a manmade bug. It's a biological weapon designed to quell, not kill.

The terrifying reality is that it was entirely successful. China is working on more controllable strains as we speak.
Click to expand...
I remember they welded bars across the fronts of large apartment buildings. Total Martial Law. It makes sense now.
You know, in Hong Kong, they have huge high and wide apartment complexes, like 5x bigger than the 2 Jewish ones in Miami, I mean large.
Buildings that take up a block or 4 and go up very high. That's how they've done it. I'm talking much larger and broader than anything in America.
There's a lot of inside there. They have everything in-house, pretty much. Stores, restaurants, everything.
It's like an A1A yankee high rise condo with about 3 shops X10.
 
Jake Starkey said:
How many successfully illegally entered the country the last three months? In the last three months (May–July 2025), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reported historically low illegal entries, with about 24,000–25,000 encounters nationwide per month, and only 4,600–8,700 apprehensions along the southwest border. www.theglobalstatistics.com/border-patrol-statistics-on-illegal-crossings/

Successful escapes into the country are 5 times greater than apprehensions.
Click to expand...
Meanwhile, the last 3-4 presidents were letting them just go in the country anyways, retard.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1911831024041971843
View: https://x.com/i/status/1911831024041971843
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top