Meanwhile, Keystone Spews 200,000 Gallons As The Nation Worries About Franken

do the math.

Oh I have and you overlook several other factors such as accidents, derailments, time to transport load and off load and the potential for a spill in an urban area. No I don't believe rail transport is better than a pipe line. If you want to believe it is fine.
 
Oh I have and you overlook several other factors such as accidents, derailments, time to transport load and off load and the potential for a spill in an urban area. No I don't believe rail transport is better than a pipe line. If you want to believe it is fine.
You are not dealing with rational people, they are mostly zealots.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Did I, when was that? The Keystone pipeline started operating in 2010, were you here back then?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

These people sound just like the people who said the Alaska Pipeline would be an environmental disaster and would run dry in a decade but it's still flowing and all the doom never occurred.
 
Why should a Koch sucker like you care about what happens to other Americans.

Yes we do care about other Americans! We don't want environmental idiots preaching doom and gloom that most likely will never happen to kill the good paying jobs of thousands of hard working Americans,
 
I just knew our resident climate change denier would find a way to NOT comment on the thread subject.

Next, he'll try and claim all that oil is GOOD for the environment.

its all natural

it fuels your life

when you give it up completely let me know anything short of that is just virtue signaling

I suspect you Warmers don't realize how fossil fuels positively impact your life
 
But wait.

Didn't Trumpkins SWEAR TO EVERYONE that the pipeline was safe?

I could have sworn they said it was safe.
I believe they all deflect that question, and cite the millions of jobs that Keystone would create.

I just knew our resident climate change denier would find a way to NOT comment on the thread subject.

Next, he'll try and claim all that oil is GOOD for the environment.
Remember those 'oil eatin' bacteria in the ocean that magically ate all the BP oil?
 
Oh I have and you overlook several other factors such as accidents, derailments, time to transport load and off load and the potential for a spill in an urban area. No I don't believe rail transport is better than a pipe line. If you want to believe it is fine.
ya..a long as the North Dakota spill wasn't part of an underground aquifer =then that is worse.
It's all about risk management
 
The amount of oil spilt is less than a third of an Olympic swimming pool, approx 5000 barrels, but that matters little to environmental fundamentalists. They detest oil in all its forms, even though they all drive, but must know deep down that the modern world would literally grind to a halt without it. The US is well on the way to becoming self sufficient in energy, you'd think the miserable sods would be happy to finally tell the Saudis to fuck off.
 
Back
Top