Meadows testifies in Atlanta

Nordberg said:
Tough proof Meadows has to convince the judge that acting to overthrow an election was part of his job. So committing crimes was part of his official duties? When Trump is involved, so is breaking the law.
Click to expand...
Grasping at straws. You would think he would be embarrassed. Although, getting in front of one of trump's incompetent appointments might work.
 
Althea said:
This is not the Mueller investigation. Mueller was kept from investigating much of anything.
Click to expand...

No he wasn't, he was free to investigate anything that came up in his investigation and he did and still could find no evidence to present for collusion or obstruction.

He had completely free reign to do whatever he wanted outside of actual prosecution.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
No he wasn't, he was free to investigate anything that came up in his investigation and he did and still could find no evidence to present for collusion or obstruction.

He had completely free reign to do whatever he wanted outside of actual prosecution.
Click to expand...

Guess what? Mueller was never investigating collusion. Did you know that?
 
Meh I agree it’s a nothing burger. Meadows isn’t going to say anything that would incriminate himself. He might throw Trump under the bus but he’s not going to throw himself under the bus.
 
Nordberg said:
Tough proof Meadows has to convince the judge that acting to overthrow an election was part of his job. So committing crimes was part of his official duties? When Trump is involved, so is breaking the law.
Click to expand...

Meadows doesn't have to prove he didn't commit a crime...prosecutors need to prove he did.....
 
Tinkerpeach said:
No he wasn't, he was free to investigate anything that came up in his investigation and he did and still could find no evidence to present for collusion or obstruction.

He had completely free reign to do whatever he wanted outside of actual prosecution.
Click to expand...
Liar.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top