McConnell's triumph leads to radical SCOTUS

[BartenderElite]

And voters need to remember this.

What McConnell did was anti-American, and anti-Constitution. The founders never intended this. Obama had a vacancy on the court, he tried to fill it, and the Senate did not fulfill their duty.

As a result, a one-term failure of a President got to make an inordinate # of court appointments, and shaped the court for a generation. And it's a radical, right-wing court - completely out of step with mainstream America.

 

[Ross Dolan]

And voters need to remember this.

What McConnell did was anti-American, and anti-Constitution. The founders never intended this. Obama had a vacancy on the court, he tried to fill it, and the Senate did not fulfill their duty.

As a result, a one-term failure of a President got to make an inordinate # of court appointments, and shaped the court for a generation. And it's a radical, right-wing court - completely out of step with mainstream America.

Trump, McConnell are scum...and conservative America from the top of their heirarchy...to the lowest level ass-kissing, moron in their ranks are scum also.

 

[Lionfish]

Trump, McConnell are scum...and conservative America from the top of their heirarchy...to the lowest level ass-kissing, moron in their ranks are scum also.

Calm down and get off my lawn. Med time at "the Home"?

 

[Whythink]

And voters need to remember this.

What McConnell did was anti-American, and anti-Constitution. The founders never intended this. Obama had a vacancy on the court, he tried to fill it, and the Senate did not fulfill their duty.

As a result, a one-term failure of a President got to make an inordinate # of court appointments, and shaped the court for a generation. And it's a radical, right-wing court - completely out of step with mainstream America.

I do believe that is the part being most overlooked. If the Supreme Court wasn't hijacked by 1 person and this was the outcome, that is very different.

I would still disagree and be upset but that would be a self-inflicted wound for the country and represent the wi of the voters.

I hate the idea of the Democrats playing dirty by packing the Court or removing the fillabuster but what choice is there? Thomas already said contraception and same sex marriage is next.. if he said that what else does he intend to go after?

Can we afford to wait to find out? The anger has already divided this country to the brink, eventually, this country will go over the cliff.

I just hope we survive.

 

[Hawkeye10]

The court that violated the Constitution with Roe v Wade was certainly radical.

 

[ExpressLane]

And voters need to remember this.

What McConnell did was anti-American, and anti-Constitution. The founders never intended this. Obama had a vacancy on the court, he tried to fill it, and the Senate did not fulfill their duty.

As a result, a one-term failure of a President got to make an inordinate # of court appointments, and shaped the court for a generation. And it's a radical, right-wing court - completely out of step with mainstream America.

Blame Joe Biden it was his idea.

 

[Stone]

And voters need to remember this.

What McConnell did was anti-American, and anti-Constitution. The founders never intended this. Obama had a vacancy on the court, he tried to fill it, and the Senate did not fulfill their duty.

As a result, a one-term failure of a President got to make an inordinate # of court appointments, and shaped the court for a generation. And it's a radical, right-wing court - completely out of step with mainstream America.

The TRIUMPH OF THE WILL..

 

[Flash]

And voters need to remember this.

What McConnell did was anti-American, and anti-Constitution. The founders never intended this. Obama had a vacancy on the court, he tried to fill it, and the Senate did not fulfill their duty.

As a result, a one-term failure of a President got to make an inordinate # of court appointments, and shaped the court for a generation. And it's a radical, right-wing court - completely out of step with mainstream America.

Would you be satisfied the Senate fulfilled their duty if they had voted against his confirmation? They had the majority.

 

[BartenderElite]

Would you be satisfied the Senate fulfilled their duty if they had voted against his confirmation? They had the majority.

No. It shouldn't be a partisan vote (and both parties are complicit in that).

People should always ask themselves: is this what the founders envisioned? Borking wasn't. Nor was McConnell's naked power play, which Americans will now have to live with for a generation.

 

[Flash]

No. It shouldn't be a partisan vote (and both parties are complicit in that).

People should always ask themselves: is this what the founders envisioned? Borking wasn't. Nor was McConnell's naked power play, which Americans will now have to live with for a generation.

Would it be a partisan vote if a majority did not favor his confirmation? Are you saying they only did their duty if they voted to confirm him?

 

[ExpressLane]

No. It shouldn't be a partisan vote (and both parties are complicit in that).

People should always ask themselves: is this what the founders envisioned? Borking wasn't. Nor was McConnell's naked power play, which Americans will now have to live with for a generation.

Biden did that

 

[PostmodernProphet]

And voters need to remember this.

What McConnell did was anti-American, and anti-Constitution. The founders never intended this. Obama had a vacancy on the court, he tried to fill it, and the Senate did not fulfill their duty.

As a result, a one-term failure of a President got to make an inordinate # of court appointments, and shaped the court for a generation. And it's a radical, right-wing court - completely out of step with mainstream America.

maybe instead you should just remember you didn't have the votes to do what you want.....

 

[archives]

The court that violated the Constitution with Roe v Wade was certainly radical.

It was a Republican Court, a Republican wrote the majority report, with a Republican sitting in the White House

 

[archives]

Blame Joe Biden it was his idea.

Wrong, Mitch framing the supposed “Biden rule” was bullshit, Biden made the comment a month before the election, not a year out

 

[Hawkeye10]

It was a Republican Court, a Republican wrote the majority report, with a Republican sitting in the White House

Do you have a point?

 

[archives]

The TRIUMPH OF THE WILL..

Pretty obvious the “rock” doesn’t know what the “Triumph of the will” was and what it said

 

[Whythink]

maybe instead you should just remember you didn't have the votes to do what you want.....

How can you claim that?

McConnell didn't allow a hearing or vote.

The senate wasn't allowed to advise or consent because of 1 person.

 

[archives]

maybe instead you should just remember you didn't have the votes to do what you want.....

Appears “pp” doesn’t understand what eliminating the filibuster is

 

[Stone]

Pretty obvious the “rock” doesn’t know what the “Triumph of the will” was and what it said

Of course I do Stupid,....thats why I posted it in jest . Nazi propaganda doc circa 1930's.

 

[Grokmaster]

And voters need to remember this.

What McConnell did was anti-American, and anti-Constitution. The founders never intended this. Obama had a vacancy on the court, he tried to fill it, and the Senate did not fulfill their duty.

As a result, a one-term failure of a President got to make an inordinate # of court appointments, and shaped the court for a generation. And it's a radical, right-wing court - completely out of step with mainstream America.

Elections have consequences.

Following the Constitution is the OPPOSITE of a "RADICAL COURT" DINGBAT.