Maybe There Isn't Going to be an Iraqistan

I want to put the whole South on Ignore.

Can Cawacko please get the Cali real estate prices down some more.
 
I consider getting someone to put me on ignore since I've soundly defeated them with logic to be a huge score, perhaps ten points for me. Then to have them publicly comment about me later- even bigger, perhaps 20 points. :)
 
For every souce denying the connection I can cite two that state otherwise.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts

Unless you're using Klingon math, I posted THREE sources .. the PENTAGON, the CIA, and the 9/11 COMMISSION that all repute your claims and the claims in this 2003 article .. thus, by your own words, you should have posted six articles that state otherwise .. not one that has been conclusively proven FALSE.
 
I consider getting someone to put me on ignore since I've soundly defeated them with logic to be a huge score, perhaps ten points for me. Then to have them publicly comment about me later- even bigger, perhaps 20 points. :)

SM, are you still giving yourself points in a debate based on how often someone insults you?

I guess that is about the only way you come out looking good in these forums. Otherwise you would have been totally humiliated by several people.

Your "logic" is laughable.
 
SM, are you still giving yourself points in a debate based on how often someone insults you?

I guess that is about the only way you come out looking good in these forums. Otherwise you would have been totally humiliated by several people.

Your "logic" is laughable.
This board has turned into an insult-fest by the liberals who can't present a logical argument. Its an embarrassment to them, not to me.
 
LOL. That's Topper.

He spends more time trying to tell people how they need some skinny girl and insulting people while talking up how much money he has.
 
That's too bad. When I first got here he'd write some intelligent things once in a while. Lately he's morphed into a water mark type.
 
This board has turned into an insult-fest by the liberals who can't present a logical argument. Its an embarrassment to them, not to me.

Actually, you have been slapped around in several debates. The insults are usually because you have attempted to twist and turn to avoid being skewered on your own words.
 
Actually, you have been slapped around in several debates. The insults are usually because you have attempted to twist and turn to avoid being skewered on your own words.

Shut up you selloutist fascist. You hold contempt for american workers in your heart, but tell yourself you're noble.
 
Actually, you have been slapped around in several debates. The insults are usually because you have attempted to twist and turn to avoid being skewered on your own words.
I have yet to lose an argument here. You yourself have made many accusations, asked to prove it, and have run away. Prove this, your latest one.
 
I have yet to lose an argument here. You yourself have made many accusations, asked to prove it, and have run away. Prove this, your latest one.

Ok, how about our latest debate.

You claimed that if someone supported abortion and said they were a christian that they were a liar. You claimed that abortion was against christian morality because it was the murder of an innocent.

And in the same thread you claimed that supporting war (which murders innocents) and supporting capital punishment (which can easily murder innocents) was not unchristian.


Your claim that one was the government and one was an individual was lunacy at its best.
 
Shut up you selloutist fascist. You hold contempt for american workers in your heart, but tell yourself you're noble.

I hold amerrican workers in the highest esteem.

But I do not hate the ones who pay them, as you do.
 
Ok, how about our latest debate.

You claimed that if someone supported abortion and said they were a christian that they were a liar. You claimed that abortion was against christian morality because it was the murder of an innocent.

And in the same thread you claimed that supporting war (which murders innocents) and supporting capital punishment (which can easily murder innocents) was not unchristian.


Your claim that one was the government and one was an individual was lunacy at its best.

One is the government and one is an individual. And again, 'let Rome have what is Rome's".

Just because you can't follow a simple line of argument doesn't mean that you've won it. In fact it means the something else entirely.
 
One is the government and one is an individual. And again, 'let Rome have what is Rome's".

Just because you can't follow a simple line of argument doesn't mean that you've won it. In fact it means the something else entirely.

That is a pitiful argument and you know it. Does the phrase "by the people, for the people..." ring any bells?




You are, in effect, saying that the lives of the citizens are the property of the gov't? "Let Rome have what is Rome's" would certainly mean that.

And the fact that you think that christian morality is fine with bombing innocent civilians and executing innocent people who have been wrongly convicted, but is adamantly against removing an unformed lump of flesh from a rape victim shows your ability to twist your beliefs.

In a previous post I mentioned that I must have missed that part of the bible, and you said I had missed a lot. Please point out any passages that support killing one set of innocents and opposes killing another set of innocents.



No SM, this argument is just one you refuse to back down from, but you lost it.
 
.....

And the fact that you think that christian morality is fine with bombing innocent civilians and executing innocent people who have been wrongly convicted, but is adamantly against removing an unformed lump of flesh from a rape victim shows your ability to twist your beliefs......

Kindly provide a link where I have said this, or I will have to claim another victory over you due to your logical fallacy: a Straw man argument.
 
Back
Top