it should be completely unconstitutional for law enforcement to determine a mandatory mental evaluation based on a verbal threat and disorderly conduct.
So you think he should not have been involuntarily commited?
it should be completely unconstitutional for law enforcement to determine a mandatory mental evaluation based on a verbal threat and disorderly conduct.
So you think he should not have been involuntarily commited?
he should not have been involuntarily committed.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Only a complete neocon parrot with delusions of intelligence would call VIDEO TAPE OF PEOPLE "biased".
and only a completely ignorant politically hacked moron would continue to refer to anyone that disagrees with them a 'neocon', especially when it's been pointed out to you numerous times that someone is a LIBERTARIAN. But don't let that stop you from looking like a douche.
Teabagger/oather/libertarian......basically clowns all belonging to the same neocon circus who think they're better than each other. Bottom line: YOU are stupid enough to call DOCUMENTED VIDEO EVIDENCE of your like minded morons using threatening language/actions against POLITICAL POLICY DISCUSSIONS "biased".
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
This is why your screen name is a joke, STY....because documenting people in the act and pointing it out is hardly a "red herring".
much the same way that a bunch of people can label a grassroots organization as 'astroturf' because they are totally disbelieving that so large a group of people can actually sway an election away from the mainstream.
REALLY? Because since they've gotten into office and have fallen into lock-step with the neocon GOP establishment.....I haven't heard the media coverage of the tea party WITHOUT the Koch brothers or Dick Armey's Freedomworks footing the bill, have you toodles? Again, I produce DOCUMENTATION that answered the question regarding tea party violent threats and hysteria inducing language....and YOU can't Libertarian BS your way past it.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
I don't condone the man's threatening the teabagger...but when someone asks where did he get the idea that the teabaggers advocate violence in any shape, form or matter.....well, the videos speak for themselves. If you like, I can produce more evidence for you to ignore
it's not going to matter how much evidence you produce, it will not stop retards like you from maintaining that the TEA party people are nothing but racist haters.
it should be completely unconstitutional for law enforcement to determine a mandatory mental evaluation based on a verbal threat and disorderly conduct.
1) They are not doctors.Why?
Well, if there is proof Mr. Fuller was viewing this biased, hate filled
website, that would certainly explain where he learned to spew his
hate speech and cause him to make threats against those that don't
view things in the same narrow minded way he does....
If there is proof from TCPinhead...which of course there isn't.
I didn't find any video having anything to do with the tea party folks....
That's because, Bravo, you're either lying, stupid or just plain lazy.
one link was Olbermann about Palin and Maddow about Second Amendment protests and another link that didn't work at all....WTF ?
Evidently, you either ignored or avoided the videos about the strapped gunners and baggers having their little rallies, or the viscious blatherings by Tea Party electorate Bachmann, or the review by Schultz on hate speech by Tea bagger advocates/neocon pundits.
Then there was some nonsense about the TP convention in Vegas....so what?
So that wasn't the video regarding the hate rhetoric and threatening gestures.
I missed all the violence....