Market turmoil 'set to continue'

uscitizen

uscitizen

Villified User
Market turmoil 'set to continue'
Trader on the New York Stock Exchange
The Federal Reserve may be under pressure to take more action
Global stock market turmoil will continue for some time, analysts have said, and may force the Federal Reserve to cut US interest rates imminently.

US and European markets stabilised on Friday after the Fed cut the rate at which it lends to banks in an effort to stem the heavy losses of recent days.

But analysts say this may not be enough to end the volatility caused by banks' exposure to the weak US housing market.

Many expect US rates to be cut from 5.25% to prevent wider economic damage.

Fed pressure

US policymakers are not officially due to hold their next interest rate meeting until 18 September.

But many experts believe they will come under pressure to cut the federal funds rate - the rate at which banks lend to each other and which is used to determine consumer borrowing rates - within days if the turbulence continues.


Until analysts have a much better understanding of the losses and their potential impact, volatility is set to continue
Henk Potts, Barclays Capital

What does the market jitters mean for your finances?

"A rate cut would send the signal that the Fed is now fully committed to restoring the order," said Stephen Gallagher, an equity analyst at Societe Generale.

The leading US Dow share index rebounded to close up 1.8% on Friday following the Fed's move to cut the primary discount rate for banks to 5.75%.

But the index has still lost 6% of its value in the past month.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6953649.stm
 
Mortgage Lender Lays Off Nearly 6,000

Friday August 17, 11:22 PM EDT

TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) — First Magnus Financial Corp., a national mortgage lender that is suspending operations, says it has laid off 99 percent of its nearly 6,000 employees nationwide and closed all of its more than 300 offices.

According to a notice filed with the state Friday, the Tucson-based company that originated home loans and then sold bundled loans into the secondary loan market expects to retain only about 60 of its employees.

First Magnus officials said a bankruptcy filing was possible.

On Thursday, First Magnus announced that it had stopped originating new loans and was suspending operations.

http://finance.myway.com/jsp/nw/nwdt_rt.jsp?section=news&feed=ap&src=601&news_id=ap-d8r36cq80&date=20070817
 
Well that one comapny just laid off 6,000. How many more will be laid off as the result of the sub prime debacle ?
 
combined with the recent changes in bankruptcy laws, it's clear that tightening the noose on the people has become an expedited action item.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_03/005781.php




March 5, 2005
THE BANKRUPTCY BILL....The bankruptcy bill currently wending its way through Congress is a complex piece of legislation covering a complex topic. So how do nonexperts figure out whether the law is any good? Is it genuinely meant to crack down on abuse of the bankruptcy system, as its sponsors say, or is there more to it?

It's hardly possible to become an instant expert in a field like this, but there are nonetheless a few proxies that can help us see what's really going on, things that help us figure out the score even if we don't understand all the details. Here are a few:


Amendments. What amendments have been offered to the bill and then rejected? Here are the main ones, all of which were summarily dismissed by the Republican majority:


From Russ Feingold, an amendment that would have allowed senior citizens to protect $75,000 of the value of their homes during bankruptcy proceedings.


From Ted Kennedy, an amendment focused on helping people who are forced into bankruptcy due to major medical expenses.


Also from Ted Kennedy, an amendment that would have protected $150,000 of the value of patients' homes from being seized to pay creditors.


From Daniel Akaka, an amendment to force credit card companies to disclose how long it would take a consumer to pay off his bill making minimum monthly payments, and what the interest rate would be.


From Dick Durbin, an amendment that would have exempted veterans from the most onerous provisions of the bill and prevented creditors from recovering debts from military personnel if the loans had annual percentage rates higher than 36%.


If stopping abuse were truly your primary goal, why would you vote against amendments like these?


Loopholes. What loopholes have been left in the bill? Answer: the bill does nothing to address the growing use of "asset protection trusts," used by rich people to shield income from bankruptcy proceedings, or to rein in the unlimited use of the homestead exemption, which allows them to shield multimillion dollar homes from bankruptcy courts.

If abuse is the target, surely these are some of the prime abuses that would be targeted by any honest bill?


Medical bankruptcy. It's true that bankruptcy rates have skyrocketed in the past couple of decades. If you look solely at population growth, you'd expect the number of bankruptcies to have grown from about 300,000 in 1980 to 400,000 in 2000. In reality, the number of bankruptcies was over 1.4 million in 2001. That's a million extra bankruptcies.

However, as Barbara O'Brien points out, there's considerable evidence that this has been driven largely by people who faced ruin due to huge unforeseen medical expenses. In fact, if you crunch the numbers in this report, it appears that about two-thirds of the extra million bankruptcies may have been caused by medical emergencies.

The bill does nothing to address this. Since medical emergencies certainly aren't an abuse of the system, wouldn't any honest bill aimed at abuse pay special attention to the recent and growing epidemic of families that declare bankruptcy due to medical emergencies?


Who's for it? Who's against it? Credit card companies, who have grown rich from their increasingly revolting loan shark-like tactics, don't want to pay the price of their reliance on these obscene methods. They want the ability to engage in any kind of shady marketing they can, eagerly promoting the virtues of almost unlimited debt to people they know to be unsound risks, but when the loans don't pay off they don't want to suffer the consequences. Credit card companies are among the primary backers of the bankruptcy bill, which is largely designed to shield them from taking responsibility for their own loan portfolios.

Conversely, practically every consumer group in the country is against the bill.


Bottom line: you don't need to understand all the intricacies of bankruptcy law to know what to think of this bill. Through their actions, its sponsors have made it abundantly plain that abuse of the system isn't their real aim: protection of major campaign contributors is. The poor get shafted, the very real crisis of medical bankruptcy is ignored, the rich are allowed loopholes that let them off the hook, and credit card companies can continue on their merry way knowing they won't have to pay the price for their own folly.

Welcome to America.
Click to expand...
 
Of course, this was all seen to be coming, no suprise. Why do you think they "reformed" the bankruptcy laws ?

I predicted the supprime mtg industry as being unsustainable, and spoke of the high personal debt loads. And the mediocre wage growth rates.
But the "experts" like spinner said not to worry grasshopper everything is fine....
I guess it depends on your point fo view, if you are the one bleeding the money from the govt and individuals it is fine to you.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top