Marital Counseling for Libertarians and Social Conservatives

One does not need a marriage license granted by the great state of Washington, the shitty state of Alabamer, nor any other state to be married. They simply need to have a marriage conducted by some institution. Where there is a wedding, a new marriage has been instituted.

Are you going to now claim that every marriage in the history of mankind that was initiated prior to modern marriage licenses being issued by governments was null and void?

If they weren't the union of a man and woman, they weren't "marriages" because that is what a "marriage" is.

What I "claimed" is that USF told a lie. He did tell a lie, he couldn't support his claim. He also stated that I had called my friends "deviants" to their face, which I never did... another lie. Then he continued on his roll of lies with something about me calling their wedding "immoral" and "heathen" which I never stated, and he couldn't substantiate. Now, I really don't give a damn what your problem is that you don't understand or comprehend this, but USF certainly didn't "pwn" anyone here. Although, he DID spend 4 days defending his LIES to no avail.
 
If they weren't the union of a man and woman, they weren't "marriages" because that is what a "marriage" is.

This part I do agree with. I will never accept any other definition of marriage. What I desire is to abolish civil marriage and place the matter in the hands of the churches. Some will choose not to abide by this definition, but its something they can do regardless of governments and what you or I think.
 
If they weren't the union of a man and woman, they weren't "marriages" because that is what a "marriage" is.

What I "claimed" is that USF told a lie. He did tell a lie, he couldn't support his claim. He also stated that I had called my friends "deviants" to their face, which I never did... another lie. Then he continued on his roll of lies with something about me calling their wedding "immoral" and "heathen" which I never stated, and he couldn't substantiate. Now, I really don't give a damn what your problem is that you don't understand or comprehend this, but USF certainly didn't "pwn" anyone here. Although, he DID spend 4 days defending his LIES to no avail.

Now, now, Dixie!!
Everyone that has followed your most recent behavior of being in error and refusing to accept it, has seen that you did use the world YES and that in the intelligent world; YES means YES.

The only one that has been trying to defend their lies, over the past few days, has been you; because I made no lies that I needed to defend.
And may I say, that you have failed miserably in your pathetic attempt to defend your duplicity.

I still want that grilled cheese sandwich, bitch.
 
I see you've finally realized that intelligent people don't use the same definitions that you use in your Dixie speech and are therefore surrendering in disgrace.
Good for you. :good4u:

Non-ignorant retards realize that many words have numerous contextual meanings, and it is up to the person using the word as to what they mean to say and the proper usage of the word in context. You should go read your dictionary some, see if you can gain some level of intelligence, so you won't be embarrassed this way again. But even more importantly, you should consider coming out of the closet and admitting your homosexuality, so you won't be a habitual lying piece of trash anymore.
 
Non-ignorant retards realize that many words have numerous contextual meanings, and it is up to the person using the word as to what they mean to say and the proper usage of the word in context. You should go read your dictionary some, see if you can gain some level of intelligence, so you won't be embarrassed this way again. But even more importantly, you should consider coming out of the closet and admitting your homosexuality, so you won't be a habitual lying piece of trash anymore.

So in Dixie speech, YES means NO and NO means YES; so when you told your gym teacher that you didn't want to suck his dick, you really meant yes you would!! :palm:
 
You've officially had your last communication with me, scumbucket. Congrats!

I disagree.
You may have had your last communication with me; but I can respond to you, as many times as I want to and there's nothing you can do about it. :cof1:

Or; is that what you really meant, in Dixie speech??

I am wondering why you would want to refer to yourself, after the comma, as a scumbucket?? :good4u:
 
No, my friends had a wedding, they did not have a marriage. You see, gay people of the same sex, can not get married in Alabama, therefore they couldn't get married, but gay people can have a wedding, and they did, and I attended it.

Hey Dixie. Considering you're against what your friend's wedding represented (a gay couple getting married) why did you attend?
 
Back
Top