Marital Counseling for Libertarians and Social Conservatives

Southern Man said:
Dude, all those guys have/ had an R after their names, not an L.
Click to expand...
Yes, the small "l" libertarian usually (as I've said repeatedly) has an R next to their name. The vast majority of them are fiscal conservatives who either barely give lip service to the social conservative issues, or do not run on them at all.

Reagan is an example of that, Gingritch, etc. None of them are "perfect" but it isn't always black/white either. It is foolish to ignore what is actually quite a lot of Rs to pretend that only your kind counts.
 
apple0154 said:
But you already had those feelings. My point is you were not "feeling-less" and then chose those feelings because of what others said.
Click to expand...
I naturally had a feeling of laziness and sloth, but society taught me that those attributes were not desirable.
 
Damocles said:
Yes, the small "l" libertarian usually (as I've said repeatedly) has an R next to their name. The vast majority of them are fiscal conservatives who either barely give lip service to the social conservative issues, or do not run on them at all.

Reagan is an example of that.
Click to expand...
So is Paul.
 
Southern Man said:
So is Paul.
Click to expand...
No, Paul is a big "L" libertarian that runs as an "R", the evidence is his Presidential run as a big "L" Libertarian in 1988. You're deliberately being obtuse and "confusing" the two because you want to remain ignorant and pretend that the libertarians (small l) in the R party are something to be ignored. Without them the R party will always lose the big elections. They are more numerous that the social "Conservatives", just less active in the Caucuses.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Which then raises the question of when did you start having feelings towards your friends of the same sex and what method was used to teach you that those feelings were not normal.
Click to expand...

You appear curious as to the sexual depravity, or lack therefore, of The Southern Man. Why is that?
 
Originally Posted by Dixie View Post
You may be right, I was thinking it was Jesus. Nevertheless, Jesus did speak out against sexual indulgences. Also, the OT says that God Himself proclaimed homosexuality an 'abomination'. To many religious folk, God kinda trumps Jesus.

Just sayin...
Click to expand...

Quote:
Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
Then you intend to adhere to all of the laws laid out in the OT??
What does the Bible say about excessive "self love"; because you've been fucking yourself, all day.
Click to expand...
If you're going to attribute a comment to others, then may I suggest that you word it as such.
Click to expand...


Now I would like to know, when I said "to many religious folk" how you interpreted that to mean I was referring to my own personal beliefs? In what way did I "make it appear" this was my personal viewpoint? I think you need to go back and study the English language, because you apparently aren't familiar enough with how it's used. I don't know of any way I could have made it more clear that I was talking about someone other than myself, I certainly didn't use any wording that indicates I was speaking of my personal views. Do you suffer from other mental afflictions as well?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So you're saying that you're a product of what Society said you should be and aren't truly an individual.

Therefore; when society dictates that you need to accept homosexuality, then you'll be OK with that.
Click to expand...

Actually what I'm saying is that society has an effect on what children think of themselves.
 
Southern Man said:
You appear curious as to the sexual depravity, or lack therefore, of The Southern Man. Why is that?
Click to expand...

Not really.
Just looking for clarification of what you're posting and thereby, getting a better understanding of where you stand and why it is so.

It is a little curious that instead of responding to the post, you choose instead to try and deflect the thread to an area that you feel more comfortable with.

Some would suggest, not necessarily me, that the subject matter at hand has made you feel uncomfortable and may have brought up negative feelings from your past.
 
Southern Man said:
Actually what I'm saying is that society has an effect on what children think of themselves.
Click to expand...

Then you agree that society shouldn't be making children feel badly about themselves and instead should be pushing for personal responsibility and acceptance of others.

Thanks
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Then you agree that society shouldn't be making children feel badly about themselves and instead should be pushing for personal responsibility and acceptance of others.

Thanks
Click to expand...

Your logic escapes me. Actually, my position has not changed. Society shouldn't lie to children and tell them that queer is normal moral natural and healthy.
 
Homosexuality is something that should be kept on the DL between, teachers /students, priests and little boys etc.
 
Southern Man said:
Then why did he run in R primaries?
Click to expand...
Because he believed that the R party had a big enough tent to handle big "L" libertarians like himself.

BTW - Your logic is circular. He ran as The Candidate for the Libertarian Party in 1988, not just in a Primary. He understands the limitation of his party, therefore attempts to join forces with smaller "l" libertarians to shape the R party into something a little more palatable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top