Many hunters use AR15's

But you seem to be arguing that they would not have used more sophisticated weapons had they been available. Which makes you retarded.

lol

Arguing what ancient hunter gatherers “would have” used is the realm of the retarded. Try to pull your head out of your ass and deal with reality. They hunted to survive, moron. How many of the Rambo wannabees here do that?
 
I'm saying that anyone who thinks technologically limited subsistence hunters would prefer using a spear over a high-powered rifle is a retard.

Retard.

There’s that moronic “would” again. Why do you have to concoct your own reality?
 
lol

Arguing what ancient hunter gatherers “would have” used is the realm of the retarded. Try to pull your head out of your ass and deal with reality. They hunted to survive, moron. How many of the Rambo wannabees here do that?

Since food is a need and I hunt for the meat I use and grow in a large garden the vegetables I eat, I could.

Any more questions, boy?
 
lol

Arguing what ancient hunter gatherers “would have” used is the realm of the retarded. Try to pull your head out of your ass and deal with reality. They hunted to survive, moron. How many of the Rambo wannabees here do that?

Well, if I don't fill my deer tags in the regular rifle season, I hunt with a flintlock in PA's flintlock season. I hunt to put meat on my table, and a good marinated deer steak beats a beef steak any day.
 
Actually, there's two versions of the mini 14. The ranch, is one of them.

Whether it's the Ranch or not, it still fires semi-auto, uses a .223 round, and can hold a 30 round magazine. The original came out in the early 1970s with the Ranch coming out in the early 1980s.

The changes between the original and the Ranch dealt more with how the casing were ejected and sighting improvements.
 
Whether it's the Ranch or not, it still fires semi-auto, uses a .223 round, and can hold a 30 round magazine. The original came out in the early 1970s with the Ranch coming out in the early 1980s.

The changes between the original and the Ranch dealt more with how the casing were ejected and sighting improvements.

Calm down Banjo, I was merely making an observation.
 
When a "hunter" can look through a scope and never even get close to their prey, can shoot from the front seat of a car, chooses game such as giraffes or elephants which do not provide meat, then it's not hunting. It's sport for fun.

yeah... because most hunters with AR15's are going to Africa to hunt Elephants???? WTF are you rambling about?
 
This thread,is a perfect example of gun nuts justify anything to pretend a weapon of war,is just another hunting gun to hunt sparrows! :-)

No one in the military would take an AR15 into battle. They would take the M16. Your comment is a perfect example of someone who regurgitates talking points from the media without bothering to educate himself on the topic.
 
People don't hunt with an AR-15 despite what dipshit the dipshit troll says. You massacre the hunt if you use any such weapon. No hunter worth his salt would destroy the meat, or trophy they seek. If people go out, and do such things, it isn't even considered hunting, it's just killing animals, or sick target practice, for emasculated piss ends of the gene pool. I'm glad we're finally seeing the AR-15 groupies, as the scum of the Earth they are.

No, you do not massacre the hunt. The AR15 shoots one round at a time. Just like most rifles.
 
If weaponry hadn't progressed beyond the musket, the 2nd Amendment would have more validity today. Isn't that right, moron?

lol

Just full of the concocted bullshit, aren’t you? Reality, pal, is not your friend. What DID happen is that weaponry DID progress. Why are you hung up on things that never occurred?
 
Back
Top