Many American White Men Worship Guns Because of Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement, and P

It is called ego defense mechanism, did this one come to close to your reality? Lol

I'm as average as average gets... maybe a little more girth than average according to one slutty girl who I have no doubt had seen enough to make valid judgement.

So, no, as far as I'm concerned, I don't worry about my penis size. I have self esteem problems that stem from family dynamics, but my penis is one thing I have no problem with.

I bet you worry about that "not so fresh feeling" often enough that you feel compelled to strike out at the opposite sex?
 
So, as a guy you have checked this out to find it isn't so?

He Tried. It was too big and wouldn't work.

I'm not one to ascribe much to it myself. Or maybe I just believe most behavior in most people is motivated by something other than penises.

Couldn't tell that from some of the posts from Patriot, USF, ILA, Pisskop, (who else?) and a few others on this forum.

You could probably add a few more.

Work out hard to get really buff? Small penis
Work extra hard and make lots of money? Small penis

Sit around your house unemployed not doing anything? Big penis.

How about posting about gay members of a forum non-stop?
 
I'm as average as average gets... maybe a little more girth than average according to one slutty girl who I have no doubt had seen enough to make valid judgement.

So, no, as far as I'm concerned, I don't worry about my penis size. I have self esteem problems that stem from family dynamics, but my penis is one thing I have no problem with.

I bet you worry about that "not so fresh feeling" often enough that you feel compelled to strike out at the opposite sex?

Yeah, everyday, it is why I shower. Funny, you are the only one taking my comments seriously, I guess it isn't your penis size that is lacking, you're just a mental midget.
 
Well there goes tinfoil with the TMI...I knew that was coming, I should have done a pool.

Isn't he the one who has discussed his penis size before? I remember one of these guys doing it, but didn't make a mental note because I didn't care.
 
Cawacko don't be so shallow. It's really not that important. ANd since when did you become obsessed with penises?

It was the theme of the thread. I didn't want to miss out on the fun.

I don't care about a dude's junk.
 
What really pisses me off about this line of logic is that it makes people who want to just be left alone and are doing nothing wrong look like they're evil or bad. It's no different than hating people who are gay. 999999/1000000 gun owners will never do anything to hurt anybody, but we have to paint them as racist, because they're bad people for doing something completely legal and minding their own business. They're not people who happen to enjoy a different hobby then other people, they're secretly violent and racist and homophobic and all these other things, rather than just regular people who want to exercise their rights in peace.
 
What really pisses me off about this line of logic is that it makes people who want to just be left alone and are doing nothing wrong look like they're evil or bad. It's no different than hating people who are gay. 999999/1000000 gun owners will never do anything to hurt anybody, but we have to paint them as racist, because they're bad people for doing something completely legal and minding their own business. They're not people who happen to enjoy a different hobby then other people, they're secretly violent and racist and homophobic and all these other things, rather than just regular people who want to exercise their rights in peace.

I almost cried, you have revealed your sensitive side here, thanks.
 
That's not what superfreak told me!

Fair enough, I do care about his junk.


tumblr_m5dcgmS5oI1r3ty02o1_500.gif
 
I saw this same thing on CBS sunday morning show. They played the same tired old gun onwer translates to male potentcy meme. Funny though, everything cited was a product of Hollywood or television studios. First they produce nothing but violent crap. Then they cite the fact that violent crap is what people watch and this somehow means people are like the stereotypes portrayed in their films. Make sense?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57577122/edelstein-on-olympus-has-fallen-and-movie-violence/

(CBS News) The latest Washington, D.C.-based thriller has got our critic David Edelstein to thinking:

Last week I endured the red-meat blockbuster "Olympus Has Fallen," and thought about violence. Now, I don't buy the idea there's a direct correlation between violence on-screen and in life. But I do worry about movie-fueled myths that make people say, "I need a gun!"

The myths have two parts.

First, violation: men rendered impotent, women imperiled.

Then, retaliation: potency restored!


In movies, it goes back to 1915, and D.W. Griffith's wildly racist "Birth of a Nation" -- the government corrupt, the women assaulted by scary blacks, the Klan riding to reclaim white supremacy.

Skipping to 1974, there's "Death Wish": Charles Bronson, the civilized man whose wife is murdered and daughter raped, who becomes a vigilante, a lone hunter in an urban jungle.

1988, a new template: "Die Hard," Bruce Willis as a New York cop robbed of stature in La-La Land, his wife using her maiden name (Horrors!). Foreign terrorists attack. The government spurns him. But the cowboy conquers the alien, wins back his woman.

So does Gerard Butler, Secret Service hero of "Olympus Has Fallen." When we meet him, he's dishonored -- he saved the president but lost the first lady. Then, a North Korean terrorist takes over the White House with an army of Asians, Middle Easterners -- darker people. He must win his (and America's) manhood back.

"Olympus Has Fallen" has a hundred times the carnage of "Die Hard," and a tenth the style. But it hits its marks. It makes you sick over the threat to American might.

Complete CBSNews.com coverage: Movies - News, reviews, videos and galleries

Which brings me to a new Pew Research Center survey: 48 percent of gun owners said they owned a gun for protection, versus 32 percent for hunting -- the reverse of 1999, when 49 percent bought guns for hunting, 26 percent for protection.

We're obsessed with being attacked.

I'm not saying we don't face threats. I am suggesting many people (primarily men) expend a disproportionate amount of energy on scenarios designed by Hollywood to inflame their inner gunslinger -- to make them addicts waiting for the next violation, a chance to exact vengeance. The next boneheaded action flick. The next bloody fix.
 
I saw this same thing on CBS sunday morning show. They played the same tired old gun onwer translates to male potentcy meme. Funny though, everything cited was a product of Hollywood or television studios. First they produce nothing but violent crap. Then they cite the fact that violent crap is what people watch and this somehow means people are like the stereotypes portrayed in their films. Make sense?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57577122/edelstein-on-olympus-has-fallen-and-movie-violence/

(CBS News) The latest Washington, D.C.-based thriller has got our critic David Edelstein to thinking:

Last week I endured the red-meat blockbuster "Olympus Has Fallen," and thought about violence. Now, I don't buy the idea there's a direct correlation between violence on-screen and in life. But I do worry about movie-fueled myths that make people say, "I need a gun!"

The myths have two parts.

First, violation: men rendered impotent, women imperiled.

Then, retaliation: potency restored!


In movies, it goes back to 1915, and D.W. Griffith's wildly racist "Birth of a Nation" -- the government corrupt, the women assaulted by scary blacks, the Klan riding to reclaim white supremacy.

Skipping to 1974, there's "Death Wish": Charles Bronson, the civilized man whose wife is murdered and daughter raped, who becomes a vigilante, a lone hunter in an urban jungle.

1988, a new template: "Die Hard," Bruce Willis as a New York cop robbed of stature in La-La Land, his wife using her maiden name (Horrors!). Foreign terrorists attack. The government spurns him. But the cowboy conquers the alien, wins back his woman.

So does Gerard Butler, Secret Service hero of "Olympus Has Fallen." When we meet him, he's dishonored -- he saved the president but lost the first lady. Then, a North Korean terrorist takes over the White House with an army of Asians, Middle Easterners -- darker people. He must win his (and America's) manhood back.

"Olympus Has Fallen" has a hundred times the carnage of "Die Hard," and a tenth the style. But it hits its marks. It makes you sick over the threat to American might.

Complete CBSNews.com coverage: Movies - News, reviews, videos and galleries

Which brings me to a new Pew Research Center survey: 48 percent of gun owners said they owned a gun for protection, versus 32 percent for hunting -- the reverse of 1999, when 49 percent bought guns for hunting, 26 percent for protection.

We're obsessed with being attacked.

I'm not saying we don't face threats. I am suggesting many people (primarily men) expend a disproportionate amount of energy on scenarios designed by Hollywood to inflame their inner gunslinger -- to make them addicts waiting for the next violation, a chance to exact vengeance. The next boneheaded action flick. The next bloody fix.

I just hope you never watched any of these movies, it would mean supporting these stereotypes, I suggest Bambi, oh wait, a hunter killed Bambi's mom, not a good suggestion, either.
 
I just hope you never watched any of these movies, it would mean supporting these stereotypes, I suggest Bambi, oh wait, a hunter killed Bambi's mom, not a good suggestion, either.

Actually, your reading comprehension is lacking since I clearly stated the only idiots who think anyone supports their stereotypes are the idiots creating them. They buy their own propaganda. And you must not be too clever.
 
Actually, your reading comprehension is lacking since I clearly stated the only idiots who think anyone supports their stereotypes are the idiots creating them. They buy their own propaganda. And you must not be too clever.

My reading omprehension is fine, you take yourself too seriously!
 
Back
Top