Althea
Althea told me...
Manafort was in the trump tower meeting. This ties everyone in the campaign to Russian conspiracy.
MANAFORT court doc redaction F.UP reveals Manfort gave CAMPAIGN data to Russian INTEL
- Thread starter Centerleftfl
- Start date
oh, I see.. and tell us "jarod" which "key groups"did they target?
come on, keep going
(((crickets)))
Mueller isn't returning his calls.
Getin the ring
Verified User
I'm just trying to get some sort of read on what the fu@k they are talking about, 100 million dollars, and two years later, and not one liberal I know or chat with has came anywhere close to explaining to me what Mueller is finding.
Like it is some dream of theirs Mueller has this bombshell that no one knows about, like no one would have leaked anything, or even spit out a plausible theory. yea right.
And jarod the wonder boy comes up with "Da Russians targeted key groups on social media" and colluded with Trump to do it
it's like watching a Will Farrell movie
Like it is some dream of theirs Mueller has this bombshell that no one knows about, like no one would have leaked anything, or even spit out a plausible theory. yea right.
And jarod the wonder boy comes up with "Da Russians targeted key groups on social media" and colluded with Trump to do it
it's like watching a Will Farrell movie
Among the findings:
- Of the roughly 3,500 ads published this week, more than half — about 1,950 — made express references to race. Those accounted for 25 million ad impressions — a measure of how many times the spot was pulled from a server for transmission to a device.
- At least 25% of the ads centered on issues involving crime and policing, often with a racial connotation. Separate ads, launched simultaneously, would stoke suspicion about how police treat black people in one ad, while another encouraged support for pro-police groups.
- Divisive racial ad buys averaged about 44 per month from 2015 through the summer of 2016 before seeing a significant increase in the run-up to Election Day. Between September and November 2016, the number of race-related spots rose to 400. An additional 900 were posted after the November election through May 2017.
oh, I see.. and tell us "jarod" which "key groups"
come on, keep going
(((crickets)))
You asked, I answered. I don’t have more details but Mueller does.
You've been told plenty of times, you're just refusing to accept it because your ego is too fragile.
Trump conspired with Russia to win the election so he could ease sanctions (like he did with Deripaska) and cede foreign policy to Russia (as he attempted to do in Syria) in exchange for getting permission from Putin to license his brand on a tower in Moscow, which has been his aspiration for decades. The GOP knew about this and was in on it, with Mitch McConnell accepting $2.5M for his Senate Leadership PAC from companies owned by Russian Oligarchs while threatening Obama with partisanship if Obama went public with what they knew back in August-September 2016.
They can’t handle the truth.
Again, plenty has been given, but you're either a sophist or you're too lazy to accept any of it.
But it's cool, because we know what's gonna happen. He's going to quit or be forced out, then this ID of yours will disappear and be replaced by a brand new one that argues the same policies, just with a different voice. But because you're too lazy, stupid, and sloppy, you'll eventually slip and reveal who you are. Then the process begins all over again. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
That's what will happen because that's what happened 10 years ago after Bush.
Tranquillus in Exile
New member
Depends what kind of data it was. Some you can get from the net, some deeper stuff you can't. Presumably this was the latter kind.
A more interesting question is: why did Manafort lie about it, and how did Mueller know he was lying? Not from Kilimnik, he's in Russia.
He is just playing that deep. Intentionally playing stupid because he wants to never admit he was wrong.
Centerleftfl
Verified User
"collusion", "da Russians"
golly! why wouldn't Russian Intelligence just go to CNN for "polling data"
uhhh I dunno boss, oh, forgot about that, yuk yuk
what a retard
You don't know SHIT. There is the polling data you and I see "for free", then there's the "internals". And campaigns pay a shitload for it and COVET once they have it.
Centerleftfl
Verified User
What OP "forgot" to include:
The other example of alleged contact with administration officials “is hearsay purportedly offered by an undisclosed third party. A spokeswoman for Deripaska has said he was never offered or received briefings about the Trump campaign. Manafort’s attorneys said that person was “asking permission to use Mr. Manafort’s name as an introduction in the event the third-party met the President,” which “does not constitute outreach by Mr. Manafort to the President.” Prosecutors have said they have no plans to file fresh charges.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/paul-manafort-shared-2016-polling-data-with-russian-employee-according-to-court-filing/2019/01/08/3f562ad8-12b0-11e9-803c-4ef28312c8b9_story.html?utm_term=.88574cabdb3d
And you would expect him to say, YEAH, I GOT CAMPAIGN BRIEFINGS FROM MANAFORT?
evince
Truthmatters
it was their internal campaigns own data
evince
Truthmatters
bingo
Get back to me when you have proof, loser.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
"a court document"..........this does not equate to evidence.......was it in the allegations?.......a prosecutor's brief?.......tell us which court document it was in......is the claim supported by fact?.....
Centerleftfl
Verified User
Nope, not letting this fade to page 3 or 4 or 5. Keep bumping this. TRUMP'S TEMPER TANTRUM last night will not obfuscate, throw shade or blast off the FRONT PAGES the PROOF that the Trump campaign COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA! (Also known as 'treason').
Notice no one from the Trump campaign was passing off data (or doing 'briefings') to France or England or Bermuda.
Notice no one from the Trump campaign was passing off data (or doing 'briefings') to France or England or Bermuda.