”A man wants to trademark ‘Trump too small’ for T-shirts. Now the Supreme Court will hear the case.”
“WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear a case in which a man tried to trademark a phrase mocking former President Donald Trump as “too small.”
“The phrase is a reference to a memorable exchange Trump had during the 2016 presidential campaign with Florida senator and GOP presidential rival Marco Rubio.”
“Rubio began the verbal jousting when he told supporters at a rally. Have you seen his hands? ... And you know what they say about men with small hands,” Rubio said”
“Federal law says that a trademark request should be refused if it involves a name, portrait or signature “identifying a particular living individual” unless the person has given “written consent.”
“But Elster (man’s attorney) says refusing to register a political slogan criticizing Trump without Trump’s consent violates the First Amendment’s Free Speech clause.”
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-...io-trademark-17eaaef8fb0411a827579341a747c40d
So where is the Thomas’s Court going on this one? They going to rule in favor of their mentor, or, the “freedom” his followers are always squawking about?
Did DeSantis finance the guy? If he will use Florida tax money to secretly fly vulnerable refugees around the country for his own political points this is certainly not beneath him
“WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear a case in which a man tried to trademark a phrase mocking former President Donald Trump as “too small.”
“The phrase is a reference to a memorable exchange Trump had during the 2016 presidential campaign with Florida senator and GOP presidential rival Marco Rubio.”
“Rubio began the verbal jousting when he told supporters at a rally. Have you seen his hands? ... And you know what they say about men with small hands,” Rubio said”
“Federal law says that a trademark request should be refused if it involves a name, portrait or signature “identifying a particular living individual” unless the person has given “written consent.”
“But Elster (man’s attorney) says refusing to register a political slogan criticizing Trump without Trump’s consent violates the First Amendment’s Free Speech clause.”
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-...io-trademark-17eaaef8fb0411a827579341a747c40d
So where is the Thomas’s Court going on this one? They going to rule in favor of their mentor, or, the “freedom” his followers are always squawking about?
Did DeSantis finance the guy? If he will use Florida tax money to secretly fly vulnerable refugees around the country for his own political points this is certainly not beneath him
