Man so petrified that the sight of semi-naked Kim on TV makes him vomit

[cawacko]

Uh-oh Prak, you and Tipper Gore better get together and start working on that rap music ban as rappers clearly objectify women. Here's an old school Oakland classic written specifically for women like Kim Kardashian.

 

[Taft2016]

She is Armenian. She is white as they come bro.

My brother-in-law is Armenian. He'll be happy to hear that for once in his life.

Frankly, "white as they come" evokes a different image to me.... Finns maybe.

 

[Phantasmal]

I'm just calling a spade a spade, she (and her whole family) are publicity whores. Hollywood and LA are full of people like that and the Kardashians stand out which is saying something.

I don't care about Kim one way or the other. I think it's damn funny when South Park mocks her but I'm also not going to look away if I see a naked picture of her.

Maybe you need some sensitivity training as to why women self objectify, especially if that baby you are trying to make is a daughter.
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4318079.aspx

 

[cancel2 2022]

Maybe you need some sensitivity training as to why women self objectify, especially if that baby you are trying to make is a daughter.
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4318079.aspx

What a load of rubbish, you Americans just love pretentious psychobabble.

 

[cawacko]

Maybe you need some sensitivity training as to why women self objectify, especially if that baby you are trying to make is a daughter.
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4318079.aspx

There are plenty of men who are publicity whores as well so I don't know how that breaks down among the sexes. One only need look at Kim's ex father-in-law Bruce Jenner. Reality TV is full off them both men and women. The Kardashians just happen to be a family full of them.

I don't see how feminists support women like Kardashian and Paris Hilton. They gained their fame by making sex tapes and being publicity whores. If I have a daughter those two sure as hell aren't who I'd want her to emulate.

 

[Bonestorm]

What a load of rubbish, you Americans just love pretentious psychobabble.

Rachel M. Calogero, PhD, is an assistant professor of psychology at Virginia Wesleyan College in Norfolk. She completed her PhD in social psychology in 2007 at the University of Kent in Canterbury, England, where she subsequently held a postdoctoral research fellowship funded by the Economic and Social Research Council.


LOL.

 

[cancel2 2022]

There are plenty of men who are publicity whores as well so I don't know how that breaks down among the sexes. One only need look at Kim's ex father-in-law Bruce Jenner. Reality TV is full off them both men and women. The Kardashians just happen to be a family full of them.

I don't see how feminists support women like Kardashian and Paris Hilton. They gained their fame by making sex tapes and being publicity whores. If I have a daughter those two sure as hell aren't who I'd want her to emulate.

Have you read the pretentious crap describing the book's contents? Do you see where it describe that they do it to get stinking rich off the backs of gullible fools that lap up all that crap.

Modern industrialized society chronically and pervasively objectifies the female body, and many women have come to view themselves through the lens of an external observer, habitually monitoring their own appearance whether in public or private settings. Given the negative effects associated with self-objectification—such as body shame, appearance anxiety, depression, and disordered eating—an empirically based approach to researching and counteracting self-objectification is critical.

This book integrates recent research developments and current clinical knowledge on self-objectification in women. Using Barbara L. Fredrickson and Tomi-Ann Roberts' objectification theory as a framework, the contributors address various aspects of the theory, including evidence for and causes of self-objectification across the life span, psychological consequences, and associated mental health risks.

The book also discusses various scales for measuring self-objectification, as well as approaches to prevent and disrupt this phenomenon. With research from a variety of disciplines—psychology, sociology, anthropology, women's studies, and political science—this book should be read by everyone interested in the well-being of women.

 

[Bonestorm]

Have you read the pretentious crap describing the book's contents?

Modern industrialized society chronically and pervasively objectifies the female body, and many women have come to view themselves through the lens of an external observer, habitually monitoring their own appearance whether in public or private settings. Given the negative effects associated with self-objectification—such as body shame, appearance anxiety, depression, and disordered eating—an empirically based approach to researching and counteracting self-objectification is critical.

This book integrates recent research developments and current clinical knowledge on self-objectification in women. Using Barbara L. Fredrickson and Tomi-Ann Roberts' objectification theory as a framework, the contributors address various aspects of the theory, including evidence for and causes of self-objectification across the life span, psychological consequences, and associated mental health risks.

The book also discusses various scales for measuring self-objectification, as well as approaches to prevent and disrupt this phenomenon.
With research from a variety of disciplines—psychology, sociology, anthropology, women's studies, and political science—this book should be read by everyone interested in the well-being of women.

How is that "pretentious?"

 

[Phantasmal]

There are plenty of men who are publicity whores as well so I don't know how that breaks down among the sexes. One only need look at Kim's ex father-in-law Bruce Jenner. Reality TV is full off them both men and women. The Kardashians just happen to be a family full of them.

I don't see how feminists support women like Kardashian and Paris Hilton. They gained their fame by making sex tapes and being publicity whores. If I have a daughter those two sure as hell aren't who I'd want her to emulate.

You didn't read the article, did you. Damn shame, you could have learned something.

 

[Phantasmal]

There are plenty of men who are publicity whores as well so I don't know how that breaks down among the sexes. One only need look at Kim's ex father-in-law Bruce Jenner. Reality TV is full off them both men and women. The Kardashians just happen to be a family full of them.

I don't see how feminists support women like Kardashian and Paris Hilton. They gained their fame by making sex tapes and being publicity whores. If I have a daughter those two sure as hell aren't who I'd want her to emulate.

Feminist don't support them, but, feminist like myself don't condemn them because of our society and it's treatment of women's sexuality. I understand that women like Hilton and Kardahian are a product of our society and it's objectifying women, who in turn, objectify themselves.

 

[cawacko]

Feminist don't support them, but we don't feminist like myself don't condemn them because of our society and it's treatment of women's sexuality. I understand that women like Hilton and Kardahian are a product of our society and it's objectifying women, who in turn, objectify themselves.

I'm not calling her a sexual whore. I'm calling her a publicity whore who's only real talent is to promote herself. I mean as a capitalist I admire her entrepreneurial ability to make herself rich. But as I stated there are plenty of men who are publicity whores as well. Kim Kardashian just happens to be at the top of the food chain. It's why she and Kayne West are a match made in heaven.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Feminist don't support them, but, feminist like myself don't condemn them because of our society and it's treatment of women's sexuality. I understand that women like Hilton and Kardahian are a product of our society and it's objectifying women, who in turn, objectify themselves.

You know all the right notes and you know how to play them but not necessarily in the right order.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

Yes, because Kim Kardashian is such a role model to liberal women. Get breast implants, make a sex tape to become famous and then become one of the biggest publicity whores in a City full of them. Feminists cheer with approval.

I don't know that "feminists" have taken an official position on Kardashian, but for me, it's not my place to approve or disapprove of what a woman does with her own body. I certainly would not call her a whore.

And for someone who brags about being tight with the founder of Girls Gone Wild, and refers to him as "my man", I really think you might want to rethink the whole thing.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

Rachel M. Calogero, PhD, is an assistant professor of psychology at Virginia Wesleyan College in Norfolk. She completed her PhD in social psychology in 2007 at the University of Kent in Canterbury, England, where she subsequently held a postdoctoral research fellowship funded by the Economic and Social Research Council.


LOL.

hahhaha

 

[Phantasmal]

Oh, look at Tom, look at Tom groaning about women being objectified, so predictable, and yet, he wonders why some women might think he is a male chauvinist.

 

[Billy the Great Khan]

I think her ridicule stems from oaris hilton's legacy. She is a public figure based solely on being banged. While lots if guys certainly have hit it that is probably the biggest reason to walk away. No telling what stds shes carrying. I get that you feel its a racial thing but thats got nothing to do with it for this white guy. Try not to mistake makeup for pretty.

I'm having trouble seeing where you think she's been with a lot of people. Or even what your idea of a lot of people is. I've probably had more partners than her (though I could say that for a lot of people).

 

[cawacko]

I don't know that "feminists" have taken an official position on Kardashian, but for me, it's not my place to approve or disapprove of what a woman does with her own body. I certainly would not call her a whore.

And for someone who brags about being tight with the founder of Girls Gone Wild, and refers to him as "my man", I really think you might want to rethink the whole thing.

Joe never had a reality show. It wasn't about him it was about the Girls Gone Wild brand. Now Joe found the spotlight many times for being an idiot but that wasn't his m.o. Kardashian is her own brand which is why she is all about getting herself in front of the camera at all times.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

Joe never had a reality show. It wasn't about him it was about the Girls Gone Wild brand. Now Joe found the spotlight many times for being an idiot but that wasn't his m.o. Kardashian is her own brand which is why she is all about getting herself in front of the camera at all times.

He's a sleazebag and a criminal Cawacko.

 

[Bonestorm]

Joe never had a reality show. It wasn't about him it was about the Girls Gone Wild brand. Now Joe found the spotlight many times for being an idiot but that wasn't his m.o. Kardashian is her own brand which is why she is all about getting herself in front of the camera at all times.

Ugh.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Rachel M. Calogero, PhD, is an assistant professor of psychology at Virginia Wesleyan College in Norfolk. She completed her PhD in social psychology in 2007 at the University of Kent in Canterbury, England, where she subsequently held a postdoctoral research fellowship funded by the Economic and Social Research Council.


LOL.

Hmm, my next door neighbour is a psychology graduate I shall have to ask her about her. She is wonderfully down to earth and pretty good at sensing bullshit.