Already did. It was an obvious plea for more attention.Take it up with TOP.
Already did. It was an obvious plea for more attention.Take it up with TOP.
What’d she say?Already did. It was an obvious plea for more attention.
What’d she say?
.I Guess this isn't it...
You speak for them?Everyone at JPP

Well anyone who doesn’t know what “it” is by now I don’t speak forYou speak for them?![]()
Already did. It was an obvious plea for more attention.
That doesn’t sound like a plea for attention. You people make things up.I Guess this isn't it...
Wasn't the story of Johann Faust popular back in the day?It'd hard to make an interesting movie about a barely intelligible illegal Slovenian immigrant who's life revolves around money, clothes, and jewelry.
Everyone knows it.That doesn’t sound like a plea for attention. You people make things up.
Knows what “it” is? I thought so.Everyone knows it.
Yep. The attention.Knows what “it” is? I thought so.
Every first łady in my łifetime was compłeteły usełess.Now why on God's green earth would any adult who actually pays attention to world/national current events USING MORE THAN ONE NEWS SOURCE would pay good money to watch some lengthy PR piece on one of the most vapid and useless First Ladies in American history? I mean, seriously, how is the Trumps taking sucker's money "owning the libs"?
That’s not what it is, silly. I already gave you the definitionYep. The attention.
Let's see. It isn't Pennywise the clown.That’s not what it is, silly. I already gave you the definition
Not in this forum, no.Let's see. It isn't Pennywise the clown.
Now you're getting it.Not in this forum, no.
I always got “it”.Now you're getting it.