major campaign donors should be publicly identified

Don Quixote said:
if people want to buy the government, then i want to know who they are

ps i am not asking for all of their financial records and you are asking for all of mine - are you interested in identity theft
Click to expand...

So $1.00 buys the government? Your wants don't trump mine, or anyone elses, rights by the way. And it doesn't matter, you're asking what other people are doing with their money, so I'm asking what you're doing with yours. I WANT to know.
 
G R I N D said:
I GAVE AN OPINION YOU FUCKING IDIOT
Click to expand...

since you felt the need to use profanity, i am putting you on ignore

or not, it appears that your status as moderator disallows ignoring, that does not change the fact that you are rude, crude and socially unacceptable

while i cannot put you on ignore, i can ignore you, which is all that you deserve
 
Last edited:
Threedee said:
Placing a Star of David on people is socially unacceptable, Don. Should I ignore you?
Click to expand...

feel free to put me on ignore, the only reason that i do not have you on ignore is that you refrain from using profanity at me

it is my opinion that profanity has no place in debate
 
Don Quixote said:
since you felt the need to use profanity, i am putting you on ignore

or not, it appears that your status as moderator disallows ignoring, that does not change the fact that you are rude, crude and socially unacceptable

while i cannot put you on ignore, i can ignore you, which is all that you deserve
Click to expand...

with respect, you get what you give. Don't pretend for a second you weren't trying to go the cute-sy passive aggressive route. You were being a douche. Your one word response says enough. It was full of smugness, pretention, and condescension. Not to mention it come off as incredibly annoying. As if there are articles on "prole dynamics among the population of the world." Yes, I'll get those citations right back to you.

Either that, or you lack the intellect to see that I was clearly giving an opinion on something. Which I don't think you are dumb enough to not get that. Which brings us back to you making a hostile comment and me responding in kind.

If you don't make douchey annoying comments then I wont have to respond to you with profanity. Can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
 
G R I N D said:
with respect, you get what you give. Don't pretend for a second you weren't trying to go the cute-sy passive aggressive route. You were being a douche. Your one word response says enough. It was full of smugness, pretention, and condescension. Not to mention it come off as incredibly annoying. As if there are articles on "prole dynamics among the population of the world." Yes, I'll get those citations right back to you.

Either that, or you lack the intellect to see that I was clearly giving an opinion on something. Which I don't think you are dumb enough to not get that. Which brings us back to you making a hostile comment and me responding in kind.

If you don't make douchey annoying comments then I wont have to respond to you with profanity. Can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
Click to expand...

it was not clear to me and that is still no excuse for profanity

i have complained to damo about your abuse of power

if you have insufficient self restraint, then you do not deserve to be a moderator

as for being cute or passive aggressive, i do not think so nor was it my intent
 
I always just assume that liberals are comfortable with profanity because it has been their MO since the sixties. Grind probably just forgot you're the exception, Don...
 
Threedee said:
I always just assume that liberals are comfortable with profanity because it has been their MO since the sixties. Grind probably just forgot you're the exception, Don...
Click to expand...

perhaps, but i spent a lot of years schooling myself not to use profanity and do not appreciate it

if grind truly forgot then let him apologize and i will drop the matter

this is what i sent to damo:

it appears that i am unable to put grind on ignore because he is one of the moderators, i find him offensive and it is unfair that i have to put up with his obnoxious posts

is there no limit on moderators?

rich
 
I love how conservative you older liberals can be, Don. You remind me that prudence and civility were once practiced in America, back before I was born... ;)
 
Threedee said:
I love how conservative you older liberals can be, Don. You remind me that prudence and civility were once practiced in America, back before I was born... ;)
Click to expand...

something that i miss

although i consider some of the people that inhabit this board exercising their explosions of profanity, idiom or insult as a form of therapy

which i do not mind too much, but they do waste my time and fill up threads with useless (to me) verbage

i guess that i am too oldfashioned
 
LOL

Democratic President Barack Obama's top campaign lawyer filed a complaint with the federal election regulator on Tuesday, demanding that the well-heeded and high-spending Republican advocacy group Crossroads GPS disclose its donors.
Obama's re-election is being helped by Democratic groups that enjoy a similar tandem relationship: sister organizations Priorities USA Action, the monthly reporting Super PAC; and Priorities USA, the non-disclosing nonprofit.


"Folks would do well to consider this a goofy sideshow until Obama sends the same letter to Priorities USA - the group modeled after Crossroads but which supports the president," Crossroads spokesman Jonathan Collegio said.


"In the end, Obama doesn't care about the campaign laws; he only cares about silencing conservative groups that are holding him accountable for his failed record."


Priorities USA Action has badly lagged Republican groups in the money game. The pro-Obama Super PAC had raised $6.1 million, while American Crossroads had raised $29.8 million, as of the end of April. These and other Super PACs are due to report their May fundraising on Wednesday.



Obama starts crying cause his PAC's are not rasing money like the Repulicans are.

wambulance_logo.jpg
 
MORE GENIES! said:
Quit trying to divert the subject. We're talking about campaign donations, which are peoples private financial transactions. Since you said they shouldn't be private, post your finances.

Oh, and the names of your drug dealers. Drugs/drug money can kill too. Best know the names and addresses of all you tokers.
Click to expand...

Why do you think that the American people have no right to know who their politicians serve? That's true fascism.
 
G R I N D said:
this.

you JEALOUS proles don't have the right to violate the privacy of someone because they are giving more money than you are.
Click to expand...

You have no right to privately buy politicians. God, do you think your masters are gonna give you a pat on the head, Grind? Call you a good little slave? How pathetic.
 
MORE GENIES! said:
So $1.00 buys the government? Your wants don't trump mine, or anyone elses, rights by the way. And it doesn't matter, you're asking what other people are doing with their money, so I'm asking what you're doing with yours. I WANT to know.
Click to expand...

This is the dumbest, most ignorant argument anyone could ever make. Stop acting like a stupid prole, begging for a pat on the head from your masters. Not all uses of money are equal. That's so retarded it doesn't even deserve a retort.
 
Oh noes, I am legally obligated to tell people about my bribes! This is the end of freedom in the country! The next step is Stalinism, clearly!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top