Mail in ballots are essential!

That is about what I expect from you. Our bad votes are .0007 percent.
Lie. Denial. Argument from randU fallacy.
You cannot defend Trump's lies,
Void argument fallacy.
so you go straight to TDS.
Your problem. You can't blame your problem on anybody else, Sybil.
Trump has lied about our elections from day 1. He has never let up. Because people like you are so easy to delude.
You can't blame Democrat election fraud on Trump, Sybil.
 
They can regulate the mail, they cannot regulate the voting.
The federal government can regulate the voting in federal elections, Pretender. You are discarding the Constitution again.
If they would deliver envelope A, then they must deliver envelope B, they cannot reject it simply because it is a vote.

Do you have no concept of the law?
It is YOU that has no concept of the law, Pretender.
 
They can regulate the mail, they cannot regulate the voting. If they would deliver envelope A, then they must deliver envelope B, they cannot reject it simply because it is a vote.

Do you have no concept of the law?
The problem isn't in law regulating the postal service, it's in the FACT that multiple people handle each ballot, unseen and unsupervised during its processing. From mailing out to receipt at the counting office, that ballot is who-knows-where. There is little proof it was filled out by the intended recipient. Anyone handling it could tamper with or even dispose of it with virtually no way to catch them in the act.

THERE IS ZERO CHAIN OF CUSTODY OF BALLOTS IN AN ALL MAIL-IN ELECTION SYSTEM.

Now, you can claim there's little or next to no fraud in that system, but you have no way to prove that. You have no way to know if there are operatives out there offering cash for your ballot or anything else. There are now videos of political operatives offering the homeless in LA $5 to register to vote. Let's say come election time--and they have weeks to do this--those same operatives offer $5 to $10 to the same homeless to get a blank, signed ballot from each one, no questions asked. Those operatives then fill out those ballots and mail them in. The supposed voter signed it. How would you know it was fraudulently cast, which it now is?

Or ballot harvesting is legal. A political operative goes through a neighborhood trying to collect ballots for turn in. They flag each ballot they think is going to vote against what they personally want voted for that they receive. They might even deliberately go to neighborhoods that typically vote against their positions. They then take those ballots and shred them rather than turning them in. How would anyone know? Ballot harvesting is legal. The voter handed it over legally. The harvester, out of sight and out of mind, destroyed the ballot or held it to the day after the election before mailing it. You have no way, ZERO, to detect that election fraud.

Mail-in elections are absolutely rife with potential for fraud.
 
It's both.

confidence1.png



Screenshot-2024-08-13-at-11.36.52%E2%80%AFAM.png


More than half the US electorate lacks confidence in our elections to one degree or another and that percentage is rising, not falling.
That's not even what that data says.

1775183303991.png

 
Yeah, Trump's blatant lies are undercutting the confidence in our elections and it makes you happy. Our elections are extremely accurate. But Trump repeats the lie over and over and it works on fools like you, You nitwits begin to believe him. Trump attacks our institutions, the glue that has held America together for 250 years.
That, of course, is the real problem. American elections are secure. They are not any less secure than they ever were. Yet suddenly, more Americans than before are skeptical about elections without literally any proof in the entire universe. That is the definition of delusion, and Trump is the cause of it (along with the relative stupidity of the general public).
 
That is about what I expect from you. Our bad votes are .0007 percent. You cannot defend Trump's lies, so you go straight to TDS. Trump has lied about our elections from day 1. He has never let up. Because people like you are so easy to delude.
What I find particularly sad is that Terry used to be one of the few conservatives on JPP who could think critically and support rational arguments. Now he resorts to na na boo boo TDS trash. His brain is as compromised as the worm-eaten one rattling around in RFK's skull. Damocles is another prime example of a once reasonable person decimated by MAGA thought.
 
Mail in ballots are subject to be regulated by the mail service, which is Federal.
Checkmate on that, Jarod me boy. You want mail-in ballots? They will be regulated by USPS.
You've been outmaneuvered. :LOL:
Jesus fucking christ, little girl, you get dumber every day.
 
Mail in ballots are subject to be regulated by the mail service, which is Federal.
Checkmate on that, Jarod me boy. You want mail-in ballots? They will be regulated by USPS.
You've been outmaneuvered. :LOL:
Mail-in is a misnomer. You take your ballot to the drop box in front of City Hall, or an election site. I have never mailed my "mail-in ballot' They tell you where to drop it off.
The mail is only involved when they send you a letter asking if you want a mail-in ballot for this election. You fill it out and send it in, or drop that off too.
It's always the ones who know nothing about how things work, who are experts on this board.
A "mail-in ballot " has the precinct it is supposed to go to. When you process the votes in the container, you check to see if they are at the right precinct. Then, if it is signed and dated. If not, and it is before election day, you call or write the voter and ask them to come in and sign the ballot, or you send them a new one.
Note, there is only one vote per person in the precinct log book. A pile of ballots would not be processed.
 
The problem isn't in law regulating the postal service, it's in the FACT that multiple people handle each ballot, unseen and unsupervised during its processing. From mailing out to receipt at the counting office, that ballot is who-knows-where. There is little proof it was filled out by the intended recipient. Anyone handling it could tamper with or even dispose of it with virtually no way to catch them in the act.

THERE IS ZERO CHAIN OF CUSTODY OF BALLOTS IN AN ALL MAIL-IN ELECTION SYSTEM.

Now, you can claim there's little or next to no fraud in that system, but you have no way to prove that. You have no way to know if there are operatives out there offering cash for your ballot or anything else. There are now videos of political operatives offering the homeless in LA $5 to register to vote. Let's say come election time--and they have weeks to do this--those same operatives offer $5 to $10 to the same homeless to get a blank, signed ballot from each one, no questions asked. Those operatives then fill out those ballots and mail them in. The supposed voter signed it. How would you know it was fraudulently cast, which it now is?

Or ballot harvesting is legal. A political operative goes through a neighborhood trying to collect ballots for turn in. They flag each ballot they think is going to vote against what they personally want voted for that they receive. They might even deliberately go to neighborhoods that typically vote against their positions. They then take those ballots and shred them rather than turning them in. How would anyone know? Ballot harvesting is legal. The voter handed it over legally. The harvester, out of sight and out of mind, destroyed the ballot or held it to the day after the election before mailing it. You have no way, ZERO, to detect that election fraud.

Mail-in elections are absolutely rife with potential for fraud.
You are the definition of delusional.
 
That's not even what that data says.

View attachment 79981

So, one in three people have little faith in our election system. I'd say that's a major problem. You dismiss a third of the population's concerns on the basis of an appeal to popularity fallacy.
 
So, one in three people have little faith in our election system. I'd say that's a major problem. You dismiss a third of the population's concerns on the basis of an appeal to popularity fallacy.
The faith was lost when Trump repeated constant lies about it. It's people like you who cannot resist. Trump's core vote is 33 percent. That matches your stats. It is you dorks who are easily fooled. We need Trump to go away.
 
The faith was lost when Trump repeated constant lies about it. It's people like you who cannot resist. Trump's core vote is 33 percent. That matches your stats. It is you dorks who are easily fooled. We need Trump to go away.
You can claim any cause you want, but that doesn't change that it's a growing problem. I can also tell you the harder the Democrats fight to loosen voter ID laws and make elections 'easier' to vote in, the greater that problem will become, Trump or no Trump.

It's Democrat led efforts like the For the Voter's Act or the John Lewis Voter's Act that Democrats have pushed as nationwide changes that undermine confidence in elections.
 
So, one in three people have little faith in our election system. I'd say that's a major problem. You dismiss a third of the population's concerns on the basis of an appeal to popularity fallacy.
I dismiss election deniers -- in whatever number they present themselves -- as uninformed fools. To believe in something without any evidence whatsoever is either a matter of faith or a matter of insanity. I am troubled by the mental illnesses and general lack of education within the MAGA movement, but I also oppose their irrational, fear-based panic about imaginary election security concerns.
 
Show me where I am wrong in what I stated. No, don't cite that election fraud is rare or some other nonsense, prove what I stated is not reasonably possible.
First of all, one does not prove a negative. I don't need to prove that there is no election fraud. Nonetheless, study after study after study after lawsuit after lawsuit after lawsuit for years and years and years have all proven, consistently and unanimously, that election fraud does not exist in any significant sense.

As far as you completely fabricating the most bizarre scenes in imagination, I'm neither kidding nor attempting to insult you when I say you should be medically evaluated. Your musings on this site have become completely untethered to reality in the past year. I only have your posts to judge you, but you seem to be a very unwell person. If you're going to swat at imaginary bats and look for secret Soviet communiques in the static on a TV screen, then you need to be medicated.
 
Back
Top