Maze
吃瓜群众
What?! Are you alright?
Magat wants to know why its wrong to rape children
- Thread starter Maze
- Start date
Who is that?
cawacko
Well-known member
The Republican Party was the party of Reagan for 35 years. Today it is this America First #MAGA movement. I don’t pretend to know how long it will last.
On Instagram recently I saw some old Clinton/Gore ads and how they were New Democrats, not your traditional tax and spend Democrats. In recent times the party has moved to a more identity based vision.
Little stays static.
Maze
吃瓜群众
The host is a very popular political commentator who does lives debates on tik tok and youtube daily. The pedophile rapist magat is this fucker https://www.tiktok.com/@based_maga_mfer
Maze
吃瓜群众
No, I got educated and escaped the brainwashings while demanding be free.
Why?
Maze
吃瓜群众
Did you watch the video in the OP?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Did you? Once again you have no valid point. Your post generates more questions than it answers.
1. Can you answer the question, or do you not know why it is wrong to epar children either.
- 1a. Are you asking me to teach you the answer to that question?
2. Why are you asking JPP to waste time watching a video of apparent idiots babbling?
3. Is this another one of your sources for non-points and incoherent raving?
4. What does this have to do with Trump?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
It appears that the leftist was the one who genuinely could not answer the question. Watch the video. The leftist is totally unable to explain what should be too easy to explain. Watch the video. This easy question which should have been answered in two seconds, left the leftist struggling to save face. The leftist was thoroughly embarrassed at being unable to explain why it is wrong to epar children.
Why, exactly, are you all-out defending this leftist who has no clue why it is wrong to epar children?
Because they lack the ability to discern right from wrong and truth from lies.
Ain't that the truth. I liked it much better when every morning didn't bring us a fresh new Biden outrage.
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Will Chamberlain
@willchamberlain
If indeed the emails refer to Giuffre - who cleared Trump under oath, and is now sadly deceased - then House Dems have a lot of explaining to do about why they redacted her name
Quote
tedfrank
@tedfrank
·
Nov 12
Replying to @DouthatNYT
Meh. Epstein and Maxwell are talking about Giuffre, who used to work for Trump, but, despite making false allegations against a lot of innocent people, expressly cleared Trump at her deposition. Nothingburger.
Maze
吃瓜群众
Do you agree with the host or the republican in the video?Post
See new posts
Conversation
Will Chamberlain
@willchamberlain
If indeed the emails refer to Giuffre - who cleared Trump under oath, and is now sadly deceased - then House Dems have a lot of explaining to do about why they redacted her name
Quote
tedfrank
@tedfrank
·
Nov 12
Replying to @DouthatNYT
Meh. Epstein and Maxwell are talking about Giuffre, who used to work for Trump, but, despite making false allegations against a lot of innocent people, expressly cleared Trump at her deposition. Nothingburger.
I agree that your pathetic "Epstein Spamfest" has already been massively debunked with the sworn testimony of the redacted victim.
You are a bad joke; period.