Madison police chief, mayor ask governor to explain 'troubling' statements

bravo said:
Yeah..You oafs are freaking unbelievable, and pathetic.

You're wrong again...she didn't help the white farmer...as she herself said.



So I took him to a white lawyer that had attended some of the training that we had provided.... I figured if I take him to one of them, that his own kind would take care of him.

she acted like a typical racist....

I can't imagine a white person saying "I took the black guy to one of his own kind for help" and not be accused to racism...

The fact that she had a change of heart is noted... she did in fact, eventually help the guy..." I went all out to frantically look for a lawyer at the last minute because the first lawyer we went to was not doing anything to really help him. "

Its like robbing a bank and the giving the money back....returning the money doesn't absolve the robbery.
Click to expand...

Bonehead.

The thread is about thinking, not acting.

You are defending the very behaviour you criticized in Sherrod.

You said as long as Walker was only thinking about it, no harm, no foul. But Sherrod thinking about it makes her a racist. Yeah, right.

Hypo......
 
Bfgrn said:
Fine, then the only PROOF we have on record is Gov Walker contemplated placing thugs.."troublemakers" in a crowd of schoolteachers, fireman, nurses, snowplow drivers and their families..."demonstrators" who were staging a peaceful demonstration. And that the only reason he didn't was because:

"... My only fear would be is if there was a ruckus caused that that would scare the public into thinking maybe the governor has got to settle to avoid all these problems."
Click to expand...

so whats your point?

If there was a ruckus? Some fictional ruckus could have been caused by union thugs acting against any troublemakers for disrupting the demonstration....its undeniably happened before.

The events NEVER HAPPENED so loading up your posts with fiery rhetoric is hackish on your part at best....
 
christiefan915 said:
Bonehead.

The thread is about thinking, not acting.

You are defending the very behaviour you criticized in Sherrod.

You said as long as Walker was only thinking about it, no harm, no foul. But Sherrod thinking about it makes her a racist. Yeah, right.

Hypo......
Click to expand...
We know what the thread is about...my post is about your lies....

Sherrod's behavior was racist,,,her inaction to help the white farmer and steering him to a white lawyer, (one of his own kind), her words, not mine...it wasn't about 'thinking' about it....

Sherrod said..." I went all out to frantically look for a lawyer at the last minute because the first lawyer we went to was not doing anything to really help him. "
That confirms action, not just thinking


the fact that she reconsidered and did in fact help the white man is irrelevant...
 
Last edited:
bravo said:
We know what the thread is about...my post is about your lies....

Sherrod's behavior was racist,,,her inaction to help the white farmer and steering him to a white lawyer, (one of his own kind), her words, not mine...it wasn't about 'thinking' about it....

the fact that she reconsidered and did in fact help the white man is irrelevant...
Click to expand...

The fact that Walker hasn't done it yet is irrelevant.
 
gotta wonder why this kind of a fuss wasn't raised when cops ACTUALLY put in covert protestors and ACTUALLY started trouble......oh yeah, they are union members.
 
christiefan915 said:
Nice deflection. The chronology of the posts shows who's spouting gibberish and it isn't me.
Click to expand...
The chronology of the posts ??

:lol: Thats absolutely precious....:palm:


How about...

chronology of the posts
cowardly neocon clowns
willfully ignorant
tea partiers
neocon toadies

I'm certainly all for interested partys to review "The chronology of the posts"......if they can keep form laughing....:)
 
SmarterThanYou said:
gotta wonder why this kind of a fuss wasn't raised when cops ACTUALLY put in covert protestors and ACTUALLY started trouble......oh yeah, they are union members.
Click to expand...

this is very general are you talking about a specific instance ans who didn't fuss about it? I would fuss about it. Creating civil discord and violence is illegal and immoral. I would not support it on either side. When was this done in Wisconsin, did I miss something while my head was in the "bucket"?
I haven't been reading my email alerts die to illness, so I may have missed something.
 
Rana said:
When he starts calling you terms of endearment, you know you "got" him :loveu:

He has no more, only personal insults.
Click to expand...

Is "sweetie" a personal insult ?....
anyway...


Hey toots,,,nice to have you back, was it the flu bug?....take you meds and get well soon....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top