You're a total and complete fucking pussy who searches for any lame excuse he can to avoid confronting the fact that you don't know shit.
Lowest unemployment since the moon landing.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
You're a total and complete fucking pussy who searches for any lame excuse he can to avoid confronting the fact that you don't know shit.
Now you're just reduced to vomiting forth random words and phrases because you can't defend your dogma due to the fact that it's stupid and you're a loser.
From 1960-1975...then it didn't.
in 1975 we spent $8k per student (measured in 2020 dollars)
In 2019 we spent $16k - again adjusted for inflation
so you are wrong, a liar, and retarded.
https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_236.55.asp
At no point did the spending go down.
But gross dollars doesn't tell us anything, nor does it support your tax cut theory.
You're just trying to get me to react to numbers, but I'm not reacting because I know those numbers don't mean anything.
If you're solely talking in gross dollars, which would be the lowest possible standard to use.
You're a big fan of low standards, I suppose.
But you're not a big fan of tying those standards to your dogma.
But has gone down in relation to GDP, which was the first metric you invoked on this thread.
So once again, we have an instance of you lowering the standards of your own argument to try and save face in a debate you've already lost.
wrong.
I was only calling out your bullshit about how spending on education went down.
It didn't. I proved it with multiple links and to pathetically try to save face, you keep discussing spending in relation to GDP. The problem is that just further cemented what a retard you are in math skills. At every attempt, I have refuted your lies
spending has went up - from 2k in 1960 to 20k in 2020.
the spending going down theory is all on you retardo.
Because you're such a lazy fucking nobody, you didn't bother to do the due diligence into the bullshit you were spouting forth here..particularly when it comes to spending cuts at the federal level.
Because oh boy, are you gonna be mad about this:
State Budget Cuts to Medicaid Means Reduced Federal Funding, Larger Total Cuts
https://ccf.georgetown.edu/2020/05/...ns-reduced-federal-funding-larger-total-cuts/
But in doing so you stupidly proved that as a percentage of GDP it did go down.
Now you're asking for a mulligan and I'm just not gonna give you one...this is a mess you created for yourself to figure out.
I've got nothing to do with it.
so what goal post are you moving now?
you claimed education spending was down. it was not.
you are dismissed. I am not going to waste time on looking into more of your nonsense when you are a proven liar in this very thread.
you did not say we are spending less in relation to GDP on education. You simply said education spending is down.
It also went up - it is at 7.1% at the most recent number
Your theory, that you mooed from the rooftops, was that cutting taxes "lets people keep more of what they earned"...however, the data shows that cutting taxes reduces the personal savings rate. So your theory is bunk.
Now as far as education goes, what I said was that education funding has been cut, which it has been and which the link you provided shows. So once you learned that, you moved your argument way back to outrage over gross dollars...but no one else is sharing your outrage and it's a pretty low standard to use, which makes you feel insecure.
So you lash out with declarations that you've "won" something, when all you've done is avoid the dissonance like a little fucking bitchass.
The original link you posted showed that it did go down as a percentage of GDP.
You didn't think it did until I posted the actual chart.
That's when you moved the bar to gross spending...because your original attempt fucking failed.
those are two sets of activities
How much money did I keep out of my paycheck? when taxes are cut, my take home pay goes up. So I am right. it is an axiom x+y > x when y>0.
How much money people save is based on other factors as well. Such as the incentive to save, vs the incentive to spend. When inflation is higher than your rate of savings, the economy is saying don't save and wait - borrow and enjoy now.
What is not true is your claim that we are spending less on education, and that is why people don't save. that was retarded, and I debunked it.
You are the one who brought up percentage-to-GDP when you posted that link.
So if that wasn't your intention, then you just completely fucked it up, or you didn't actually read anything that was in the link you shared...which means you sloppily and hurriedly rushed to post something because of your compulsion to open that big, fat, stupid mouth of yours.
All I've done on this thread is take the links YOU GAVE ME and show how you are wrong.
You should be thanking me for doing this with such grace.
No.
The problem is that you can't control that big, fat, stupid mouth of yours.
You say dumb things and then have to spend all your time walking them back or shifting the parameters of what you meant.
That's loser behavior.
So what? As a percentage of GDP, it's declined.
cuckoo
I proved education spending went up
you lost. sorry you are retarded and losses to you feel like wins. maybe that is why you need government to spend more? so more losses feel like wins for you