Lowest unemployment since the moon landing.

LV426 said:
What point do you think you're making by going back 63 years? Because the data you shared showed education funding stopped "skyrocketing" in the 1970's.
Click to expand...

You are a liar and a retard - that is not a good combination.

The chart you love is comparing spending as it related to GDP. GDP in the 70's was a fraction of what it is now - But your arguemnt is that we are spending less, so a GDP comparison is retarded and a loss for you

We can go back as far as you want you little shit stain retard

Compare spending by dollars - and it shows what a horrible liar, retard and shitty debater you are.

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_236.55.asp?current=yes

Also, you're a hack who steals my lines because you're not clever enough to come up with any on your own.
Click to expand...

cuckoo. cuckoo. :laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
zymurgy said:
The reason for why savings have depleted is quite simple - that is what they wanted to happen!
Click to expand...

"They", I assume means the Jews for you, right?

So now it's a Jewish conspiracy to make low taxation look like a bad thing by sharing data that shows it's a bad thing?

There is no conspiracy, you're just a fucking idiot.
 
zymurgy said:
We live in a perverse age where inflation rates are higher than savings rates.
Click to expand...

So then we should return to the conditions where that wasn't the case...and the last time we had those conditions was in the 1970's, when education spending was at its highest, the top tax rate was 90%, and personal savings reached their peak.

All according to the data you have shared here.

So going back to the first stupid thing you said, that cutting taxes "lets you keep more of what you earned", will you agree that the data shows the highest rate of personal savings was when the top tax rate was 90%?
 
LV426 said:
"They", I assume means the Jews for you, right?

So now it's a Jewish conspiracy to make low taxation look like a bad thing by sharing data that shows it's a bad thing?

There is no conspiracy, you're just a fucking idiot.
Click to expand...
they are you retarded woke morons. are you jewish? does it matter? you are an asshole defending the indefensible
 
zymurgy said:
As soon as Americans get conservative about their consumption, we will go into a recession and you people will freak out because our debt burden requires us to never go into a recession.
Click to expand...

So remember earlier when I explained that the reason I break up your posts into multiple responses is because you're so erratic and scattered in your thinking? THIS IS THE EXAMPLE OF THAT.

You are diverting and deflecting away from the fact that your central theory about tax cuts are contradicted by the data YOU SHARED on this thread.

You spent a shitload of time whining about "personal savings" and trying to tie it to government spending, except in every single case where personal savings were at their highest levels the top tax rate was 90% and government spending was at its highest levels.

So you need a new economic theory, or you just need to accept reality.
 
LV426 said:
So remember earlier when I explained that the reason I break up your posts into multiple responses is because you're so erratic and scattered in your thinking? THIS IS THE EXAMPLE OF THAT.

You are diverting and deflecting away from the fact that your central theory about tax cuts are contradicted by the data YOU SHARED on this thread.

You spent a shitload of time whining about "personal savings" and trying to tie it to government spending, except in every single case where personal savings were at their highest levels the top tax rate was 90%.

So you need a new economic theory or you just need to accept reality.
Click to expand...

no changing the subject. nobody gives a rats ass why retards do retarded things.

Stick with the facts here. you admitted one obvious mistake. time for the second one

you are a liar or a retard to keep saying education spending was higher in the 70's Admit it now. you are wrong. say it. be a man !

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_236.55.asp
 
zymurgy said:
Why does America consume 50% of the resources while being 5% of population? Because of our perverse system. the one you continue to support and lie about constantly. Like pretending we are not spending more on education
Click to expand...

This has nothing to do with your central thesis that tax cuts "let you keep more of what you earned" when the data shows that the lower the tax rate, the lower the personal savings rate.
 
zymurgy said:
The chart you love is comparing spending as it related to GDP. GDP in the 70's was a fraction of what it is now
Click to expand...

Moron, the chart specifically shows the percentage of GDP education spending makes up, so it doesn't matter what GDP was in the 1970's vs. 2020's because that's not what the chart is measuring.
 
zymurgy said:
But your arguemnt is that we are spending less
Click to expand...

I never made such an argument.

So this is you creating a straw man because your point fucking fell flat.


zymurgy said:
We can go back as far as you want you little shit stain retard
Click to expand...

We don't need to because we have this chart, and the chart clearly shows that education spending as a % of GDP stopped skyrocketing 50 years ago:

usgs_chart2p51.png
 
LV426 said:
Moron, the chart specifically shows the percentage of GDP education spending makes up, so it doesn't matter what GDP was in the 1970's vs. 2020's because that's not what the chart is measuring.
Click to expand...

moron, GDP has skyrocketed.

This is an extremely fair comparison. It compares dollars per student, adjusted for inflation. So it accounts for the growth in population and inflation. And goes far enough back to settle your bullshit once and for all.

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d21/tables/dt21_236.55.asp

you lose.
 
zymurgy said:
Compare spending by dollars
Click to expand...

You can fudge the data any way you want, but the facts show that when education spending was at its highest as a percentage of GDP, personal savings were also at their highest and the top tax rate was 90%.

So when taxes were higher, people saved more.

That is according to the data you shared.
 
zymurgy said:
they are you retarded woke morons. are you jewish? does it matter? you are an asshole defending the indefensible
Click to expand...

Your coded antisemitism is so juvenile and primitive.

But it has little to do with why your theory on tax cuts is wrong.
 
zymurgy said:
liar - education spending was not the highest in the 70's.
Click to expand...

According to your chart, it was as a percentage of GDP.

Also according to your chart, the percentage of GDP it made up remained pretty much the same until COVID, but has since dropped back down post-COVID according to the chart you shared.

So you want conditions that produce higher personal savings, but the problem is that those conditions disprove your central thesis on tax cuts.
 
LV426 said:
Your coded antisemitism is so juvenile and primitive.

But it has little to do with why your theory on tax cuts is wrong.
Click to expand...

your retarded math is hilarious

in 1978 gdp was 2,351,600M and we spent 6% on education (I rounded up)

in 2020 gdp was 21,060,500M and we spent 5.1% on education (I rounded down)

And you are so retarded, you will sit here and argue for hours and hours that we spent more on education in 1978

you are the biggest liar and shit stain on the forum.


and because you got your ass kicked so hard, you now have to pretend this is about being against jews. you are fucked up
 
zymurgy said:
you are a liar or a retard to keep saying education spending was higher in the 70's]
Click to expand...

It is according to the data you shared.

So you started off by arguing education spending as a percentage of GDP, and when you realized that was a losing argument because the data contradicts it, you shifted to gross spending to try and exaggerate how much is spent on education in order to somehow prove that low taxes lead to higher personal savings when there is no data that shows that to be true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top