This is how not to attract new business or vacationers to your state!
No Gas- No Squeegy!
Hilarious!
Makes no difference to ICE users.
This is how not to attract new business or vacationers to your state!
No Gas- No Squeegy!
Hilarious!
What? Be specific.EV's have tremendous advantages over the combustion engine,
What lady? Be specific.but then again we shouldn't expect any brilliance from the lady who told us, about million deaths ago, that Covid was no different than the common cold,
Can they tow my 5th wheel?
Let's see. They list these:
Less maintenance Not true. Tesla is one of the least reliable cars on the road.
https://luxurycarsa2z.com/is-tesla-...ch features, comfort, performance, and safety.
High-level performance at a comparatively cheaper price
Not true either. EV's generally cost more than comparable ICE cars do.
Easy to drive No easier or harder to drive than an ICE vehicle. This is just a non sequitur.
Quiet ride and less noise pollution Barely.
https://getjerry.com/questions/how-much-quieter-are-electric-cars
Higher efficiency Vague to the point of meaningless. Higher efficiency than what and in what ways?
Off-road capabilities Bullshit! There is no advantage in an EV in off-road capability.
Federal Tax Credit This is not something related to the vehicle itself, it's just getting OPM in the form of a government bribe to buy one.
Access to High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes Another bribe by the government not related to the vehicle.
Lower ownership costs Actually, this is a lie. It costs more to own an EV over the life of the vehicle
https://insideevs.com/news/586195/t...del 3 RWD,$0.63 per mile 2021 TCO vs 2020 TCO
Better for the environment Again, not an innate advantage over an ICE vehicle unless you happen to give a shit about the environment.
They cannot enforce that with visitors. The tax will no doubt be added to your registration cost.
Most manufacturers list respectable tow ratings for their EV trucks. Rivian, for instance, says the R1T can pull 11,000 pounds. Properly equipped, Ford says, an F-150 Lighting can tow 10,000.
Total bullshit of course
I am just saying when a state rebels and becomes Politically against new technologies like Electric cars as a whole, they would eventually not allow for the Charging Stations or the sale of such vehicles there. There would be no infrastructure for electric cars there.
Business would choose not to re-locate and move their employees there in a state that is moving backwards and not forward- and it would eventually kill tourism to their state!
People would move to more sane and modern states that had more options available for them.
Just like there was ZERO technological reason we need to go to cordless tools?
Sorry, but while you're entitled to your denials, I'll stick with NASA's assessment.![]()
Wrong again. Cordless tools eliminate extension cords and the need for a generator or other power source on a construction site. The convenience of those greatly increases their usefulness. That doesn't extend to vehicles though. There is no advantage to a battery car, and there are several obvious disadvantages.
Battery car disadvantages:
Battery life
Inability to carry extra charge--limits them to locations where charging is available
Charge time
Issues with accessing a charging point.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration is your friend.
Don't forget that charging them generally requires a power plant that is probably burning oil or natural gas to run it.
Fortunately, those with EV's wind up paying a lot less over the life of their car than people with comparable vehicles that use internal combustion engines. $110/year won't negate that.
Take the Mini Cooper, as an example, since there are directly comparable combustion and EV versions.
EV:
Price $30,750
-$7,500 federal tax incentive
-$2,500 Louisiana tax credit
Five years maintenance $4,950
Five-year Fuel cost: $3,232
- remaining value (purchase price less 5 years depreciation): $9,863
Louisiana Road Tax, 5 years: $550
Total cost of five years of ownership: $19,619
Gas-powered:
Price $24,250
Five years maintenance $6,398
Five-year Fuel cost (assuming $4/gallon and 15k per year) $9,600
- remaining value (purchase price less 5 years depreciation): $8,020
Total cost of five years of ownership: $32,228
So, even with the road tax, you'll be shelling out about 64% more over five years to own that internal-combustion-engine. From a personal finance perspective, that's a poor decision, but some people are willing to pay a premium for the satisfaction of knowing that they're doing their part to destroy the environment.
https://vincentric.com/Home/Industry-Reports/Vincentric-Segment-Analysis-Ownership-Costs
https://www.caranddriver.com/shopping-advice/a32494027/ev-vs-gas-cheaper-to-own/
That said, what I'd like to see is a move to GPS-based road taxes. Basically, treat all roads as if they were toll roads, and simply distribute the expected costs of maintaining and patrolling each road across their actual users, so that you pay for what you use (possibly with an adjustment based on vehicle weight, since bigger vehicles cause more wear and tear).
The advantage of that would be that it would cut back on the huge subsidy the currently goes to rural people. Costs to maintain roads, per vehicle mile, are much, much higher in areas where roads aren't used as much.... since much of the deterioration of a road is caused by weather and time, and that portion will happen to the same degree whether there's 100 cars using that road per day, or 100,000. That means when taxes to fund roads are paid for by way of what is effectively a per-mile tax (like gas taxes), people who mostly drive on heavily-trafficked roads are overpaying, while those who mostly drive on sparsely traveled roads are underpaying.
EVs are more expensive. A lot more expensive.The advantage, aside from lower cost for the consumer,
What environmental impact? Meaningless phrase. Buzzword fallacy.is the environmental impact.
Methane is a hydrocarbon. So is oil. Coal is carbon.With battery-driven cars, the energy comes in part from low- or zero-carbon generation,
Fossils aren't used for fuel. Fossils don't burn.meaning less fossil fuel
What particulate pollution? Meaningless phrase. Buzzword fallacy.contribution per vehicle mile. Moreover, with battery-driven cars, there is less particulate pollution
What chemical pollution? Meaningless phrase. Buzzword fallacy.and chemical pollution
Fossils aren't used for fuel.going into our neighborhoods (even when it's ultimately powered by fossil fuels
Generators are not a level.at the generator level,
Burning natural gas to convert to electric power is lossy. Converting that electric power to chemical energy is lossy. Converting that chemical energy back to mechanical energy is lossy. Waste heat occurs at every step and every time you convert energy from one form to another.that's more likely to be an ultra-efficient combined cycle natural gas station,
Natural gas plants do not need to scrub anything.where the exhaust not only gets scrubbed much more effectively before going into the air,
What's wrong with exhaust?but also tends to go up high smoke stacks and get washed out before winding up in people's lungs the way that happens if the exhaust is being spewed right on roads next to where people live.
No. They are really not that much quieter.There's also less noise pollution with electric vehicles.
No. They are not that much quieter.Although some road noise is from tires on roads and wind resistance, and that happens either way, electric vehicles tend to be MUCH quieter overall, especially at lower speeds.
They are telling you they are not going to buy an electric car.I once lived in an apartment complex sitting next to a stroad with a traffic light, and the traffic noise as people accelerated out of that light could be terrible (especially with motorcycles, big trucks, and sports cars).
So are most cars when they accelerate. Big hairy deal.Electric vehicles are nearly silent when doing that.
Some people are doing just that, to avoid high fuel prices.
No, it isn't. NASA is a government agency. It is not a God. It is not a friend.
NASA worship. NASA has nothing to do with this conversation.