Looks like yet another school shooting, OSU

As far as I can see, the gun laws in America allow anyone to lay his hands on a means of killing people - except for one decent British lad who tried to do the right thing by the Great Fart. and was prevented!
 
As far as I can see, the gun laws in America allow anyone to lay his hands on a means of killing people - except for one decent British lad who tried to do the right thing by the Great Fart. and was prevented!

And....anyone can purchase a car and use it as a weapon of mass destruction as just evidenced. That's the way freedom and liberty work, only criminals lose their natural rights of freedom and liberty. The righteous are never punished because the 1% criminal element with premeditation used that freedom to KILL via the use of LEGAL "Objects". What would you suggest...punish the 99% moral population that uses tools the correct way? That sounds kind'a FASCIST to me. :) Not to mention THE BABY that was in the bath water you just tossed out is out in the elements freezing to death as we speak.

In other words...if you take away these legal objects form the righteous....what do you have left (wink, wink)? That 1% criminal element will be the only ones now armed with weapons of possible mass destruction to use on the 99% that your stupidity just DISARMED. Like shooting fish in a barrel.

The only tried and true method to keep and maintain the peace? You must continually sue for peace by staying prepared for WAR. Or as we used to say in the military "Si vis pacem, para bellum" The last unit I served in used the motto, "prepared anytime". You never gain true and lasting peace through a demonstration of weak assed appeasement...you only show your hesitance to use force were force might be required to protect the existing peace.
 
Last edited:
And....anyone can purchase a car and use it as a weapon of mass destruction as just evidenced. That's the way freedom and liberty work, only criminals lose their natural rights of freedom and liberty. The righteous are never punished because the 1% criminal element with premeditation used that freedom to KILL via the use of LEGAL "Objects". What would you suggest...punish the 99% moral population that uses tools the correct way? That sounds kind'a FASCIST to me. :) Not to mention THE BABY that was in the bath water you just tossed out is out in the elements freezing to death as we speak.

In other words...if you take away these legal objects form the righteous....what do you have left (wink, wink)? That 1% criminal element will be the only ones now armed with weapons of possible mass destruction to use on the 99% that your stupidity just DISARMED. Like shooting fish in a barrel.

The only tried and true method to keep and maintain the peace? You must continually sue for peace by staying prepared for WAR. Or as we used to say in the military "Si vis pacem, para bellum" The last unit I served in used the motto, "prepared anytime". You never gain true and lasting peace through a demonstration of weak assed appeasement...you only show your hesitance to use force were force might be required to protect the existing peace.

Cars are a means of transport that, like sky-scraper windows, can be used to kill. Guns are for no other purpose whatever, and in civilised countries most people don't have them for that reason. You poor buggers live in terror and must go round armed like Sicilian bandits because you have no guts, and the results are that you are always more likely to suffer the horrors you dread, poor yellow buggers!
 
Cars are a means of transport that, like sky-scraper windows, can be used to kill. Guns are for no other purpose whatever, and in civilised countries most people don't have them for that reason. You poor buggers live in terror and must go round armed like Sicilian bandits because you have no guts, and the results are that you are always more likely to suffer the horrors you dread, poor yellow buggers!

FYI: This nation was constructed with the use of GUNS as anything but weapons. Guns were used during the 1st 150 years to provide food. Now they are used to protect freedom and liberty from the other IDIOT civilized nations that have each averaged 6 violent revolutions over the same period of history this nation used one 8 page document as standard of jurisprudence....and GUNS to protect the public safety from criminals.....those other (wink, wink) civilized nations seeking social justice through disarming their populous? Those 6 revolution's.... Have buried over 100 million of their citizens in shallow unmarked graves.....the majority because their governments DISARMED THEM and they could not protect their lives, liberty or property.

Your flawed false premise point? :) The obvious? Ask yourself this simple brain teaser. How many times has the US and its GUNS pulled the likes of your condescending righteous ass out of the fire known as totalitarianism during the existence of THE US 250 year history? Let's count the number of times the US pulled the world's tits out of the wringer with those GUNS they refused to take away from their citizens.....the obvious 2, 2 world wars.....the other...a cold war...won not by being weak and disarming as you are suggesting but by demonstrating just how much weaponry and might the US was prepared to use...if necessary. The evil kingdom fell that was formally known as the USSR.

But...if you are a proponent of social fascism...as your retorts suggest....I can see why you would want the US disarmed.
 
Last edited:
FYI: This nation was constructed with the use of GUNS as anything but weapons. Guns were used during the 1st 150 years to provide food. Now they are used to protect freedom and liberty from the other IDIOT civilized nations that have each averaged 6 violent revolutions each over the same period of history this nation used one 8 page document as standard of jurisprudence....and GUNS to protect the public safety from criminals.....those other (wink, wink) civilized nations seeking social justice through disarming their populous? Have buried over 100 million of their citizens in shallow unmarked graves.....the majority because their governments DISARMED THEM and they could not protect their lives, liberty or property.

Your flawed false premise point? :) The obvious? Ask yourself this simple brain teaser. How many times has the US and its GUNS pulled the likes of your condescending righteous ass out of the fire known as totalitarianism during the existence of THE US 250 year history? Let's count the number of times the US pulled the world's tits out of the wringer with those GUNS they refused to take away from their citizens.....the obvious 2, 2 world wars.....the other...a cold war...won not by being weak and disarming as you are suggesting but by demonstrating just how much weaponry and might the US was prepared to use...if necessary. The evil kingdom fell that was formally known as the USSR.

I said they were used only to kill, and assume that, even in America, you don't eat live animals. As you know, you've never done anything for us in war except come in at the last moment when there was money to be made, to steal what you could. Naturally, we arm soldiers to fight, then take the guns back, rather than cowering in cellars and under the bed with our bang-bangs because we hate our neighbours and are scared shitless like you. The only 'liberty' you got with your bang-bangs was the liberty to rob. lynch and rape. The USSR did, at least, save us from Hitler at Stalingrad. What have you ever done for anyone other than 'Israel', Franco and other bullies and murderers?
 
I said they were used only to kill, and assume that, even in America, you don't eat live animals. As you know, you've never done anything for us in war except come in at the last moment when there was money to be made, to steal what you could. Naturally, we arm soldiers to fight, then take the guns back, rather than cowering in cellars and under the bed with our bang-bangs because we hate our neighbours and are scared shitless like you. The only 'liberty' you got with your bang-bangs was the liberty to rob. lynch and rape. The USSR did, at least, save us from Hitler at Stalingrad. What have you ever done for anyone other than 'Israel', Franco and other bullies and murderers?

And the false premise? All killing is wrong? And cars don't kill? Really? Your false premise denies the reality that exists between JUSTICE and MURDER. And of course Stalin did not use guns....nor did he take guns away from his citizens and of course you deny that he MURDERED some 20,000,000.....murdered, not justly killed due to crimes against humanity...but murdered. He murdered over 20 million of his own UNARMED citizens. Why? Because he could...they were disarmed.

You are ranting from one end of the spectrum to other...all the while proving the point. Guns are used by the righteous in a righteous manner...to protect and to serve. And used by criminals to commit crimes. And yes....killing is JUSTICE if crimes against humanity are proven beyond doubt......or killing is justified to protect, life, liberty and property.

Stalin was a criminal....who abused the tools of weaponry. As the Christ said, "....the man who is well armed, knows his palace and property are protected." Luke -- 11:21

A gun is a tool. A tool designed not only to kill but to target practice....or have you never heard of shooting clay pigeons? Or the Olympic shooting teams...etc., Your false premise falls on its face. Its the hard heart that kills....not the inanimate object. Name one instance where a gun killed someone without first being activated by a person or some other external force. Guns don't kill....stupid liberals kill....by attempting to justify in a false manner that only criminals should possess weapons. Indeed.....God created all men...but it was Sam Colt who made them equal.
 
Last edited:
muslimes will do for now
It doesn't matter. This wasn't the trailer park you live in where this happened Bubba. This was THE Ohio State University where everyone is a Buckeye and, as everyone should know, Buckeyes are nuts.

So yea, I can see where a simple minded uneducated rube like you, who lacks critical thinking skills, would want to blame a great religion instead of a nut.
 
There are reputedly over 300 million guns in the US, how many is enough?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

It isn't the guns that are the problem dimwit; in addition, this attack wasn't about guns! DUH!!

How many guns did the guy driving the truck through French crowds use? DUH!
 
I hate it when people die, but I love pointing out hypocrisy.

This needs to stop and common sense gun control is ONE of the ways to work on ending it. More important however is comprehensive mental health availability. Locally we have a kid who went crazy, he was looking for help all over the place, but kept getting sent away after superficial assessments and cursory help... the kid then killed two innocent bystanders and ate their faces off.

Dear Dunce; your Dear Leader is still the President. Not only are your arguments a complete failure, but your claims are asinine.
 
And the false premise? All killing is wrong? And cars don't kill? Really? Your false premise denies the reality that exists between JUSTICE and MURDER. And of course Stalin did not use guns....nor did he take guns away from his citizens and of course you deny that he MURDERED some 20,000,000.....murdered, not justly killed due to crimes against humanity...but murdered. He murdered over 20 million of his own UNARMED citizens. Why? Because he could...they were disarmed.

You are ranting from one end of the spectrum to other...all the while proving the point. Guns are used by the righteous in a righteous manner...to protect and to serve. And used by criminals to commit crimes. And yes....killing is JUSTICE if crimes against humanity are proven beyond doubt......or killing is justified to protect, life, liberty and property.

Stalin was a criminal....who abused the tools of weaponry. As the Christ said, "....the man who is well armed, knows his palace and property are protected." Luke -- 11:21

A gun is a tool. A tool designed not only to kill but to target practice....or have you never heard of shooting clay pigeons? Or the Olympic shooting teams...etc., Your false premise falls on its face. Its the hard heart that kills....not the inanimate object. Name one instance where a gun killed someone without first being activated by a person or some other external force. Guns don't kill....stupid liberals kill....by attempting to justify in a false manner that only criminals should possess weapons. Indeed.....God created all men...but it was Sam Colt who made them equal.

Guns are to kill with: they have no other purpose. To give every nutter a gun is to terrify all the other poor buggers, so in the end you get an armed camp, not a society, obviously, and yours is very, very deeply sick, living in a ludicrous dreamworld. What the shit has Stalin got to do with your madness - he's dead, you nutter. Whatever madmen mean by 'righteous' is hardly relevant to anything, because they are foaming at the mouth and electing fat, spoiled moneymen to protect workers, godelpus, even before they are forced to. You are a tool, designed to kiss your bosses' arses, as you know, and use your ludicrous bang-bangs to make believe you are human. Don't waste your time.
 
So, this thread started as a "guns are responsible, ban every one of them" message, and ended as a "one guy who may be Muslim did this, so ban every one of them" message.

Well, I guess it is a political message board.

Wrong shit-for-brains; it ended with another Muslim attacking innocents because......he was a terrorist sympathizer and Somali who was permitted to live her by the Obama Administration wo looks at these people as a great and ignorant voting constituency.
 
Back
Top