Look how these Stanford law school students treat a judge

Cry me a river, you snowflake bitch. Then drown yourself in it. I don't care what you post. No one was talking to you, and you've never said anything that matters anyway. By all means, though, keep pretending you're a victim. That's what you brain dead fucks claim anyway.

derp derp
 
What I love is the fat retarded cow got up and said how "uncomfortable" she was even in a room full of people that agree with her but you're so retarded that you mock others about their "hurt feelings". You clearly have a syphilitic brain.

The spitting anger you people have for education simply because you don't have one, can't afford one, and wouldn't get accepted anyway is so boring.
 
Cry me a river, you snowflake bitch. Then drown yourself in it. I don't care what you post. No one was talking to you, and you've never said anything that matters anyway. By all means, though, keep pretending you're a victim. That's what you brain dead fucks claim anyway.

Like the fat cow in the video claiming she was "uncomfortable"? Leftists are fucking retards
 
Like the fat cow in the video claiming she was "uncomfortable"? Leftists are fucking retards

If her goal was to calm the situation so the "Judge" got a chance to speak, (which is what it should have been) she did a great job.
 
The spitting anger you people have for education simply because you don't have one, can't afford one, and wouldn't get accepted anyway is so boring.

So you accept that the fat cow is a whiny bitch AKA leftist because the words made her "uncomfortable" yet others are snowflakes and not you pussies.
 
Last edited:
This is what the right is fixated on. Some rude college students. Meanwhile, a judge in a REAL COURTROOM is about to deny 100+ million women a perfectly safe drug because of his personal religious beliefs. THAT is something to be concerned about. This is just more poutrage from the snowflakes.
 
What I like is how hes deciding for others who feels verbally assaulted.
Especially when he didn't read the link... which clearly stated that the judge was verbally assaulted... buy both the students and the associate Dean of "DEI"...
 
This is what the right is fixated on. Some rude college students. Meanwhile, a judge in a REAL COURTROOM is about to deny 100+ million women a perfectly safe drug because of his personal religious beliefs. THAT is something to be concerned about. This is just more poutrage from the snowflakes.

They are the real snowflakes, and they love to focus on small issues because it riles the base without getting noticed by the independents.
 
If her goal was to calm the situation so the "Judge" got a chance to speak, (which is what it should have been) she did a great job.

Why should such a think be necessary? Shouldn't supposedly intelligent adults be able to engage in civil discussion with people that disagree with them? It's necessary because leftists have taught these brats that their feelings are all that matters and that whenever your feelings are "hurt" you can do whatever the fuck you please.
 
Especially when he didn't read the link... which clearly stated that the judge was verbally assaulted... buy both the students and the associate Dean of "DEI"...

The link may have said those words, but its a matter of opinion and it did not offer facts to back up that statement. You see one must read liberal and conservative articles in a critical way and judge for themselves. Its important to filter out any opinions for which data is not offered.

On the video I saw, nobody was verbally assaulted.

I read the article, twice.
 
They are the real snowflakes, and they love to focus on small issues because it riles the base without getting noticed by the independents.

Lmfao NOW it's a "small issue". So small in fact that the people listening to the judge couldn't help but disrupt his talk and the fat cow had to tell us how "uncomfortable" this small issue made her. You people are fucked in the head.
 
Why should such a think be necessary? Shouldn't supposedly intelligent adults be able to engage in civil discussion with people that disagree with them? It's necessary because leftists have taught these brats that their feelings are all that matters and that whenever your feelings are "hurt" you can do whatever the fuck you please.

I do not know why it was necessary, I did not see/hear what happened prior to the uproar on video.

Generally speaking such a discussion should be held in a civil way.
 
Lmfao NOW it's a "small issue". So small in fact that the people listenjg to the judge had to disrupt his talk and the fat cow had to tell us how "uncomfortable" this small issue made her. You people are fucked in the head.

A judges talk at a law school being disrupted is a small issue. Sorry. A mob's attempt to kill the Vice President is a big issue.
 
The link may have said those words, but its a matter of opinion and it did not offer facts to back up that statement. You see one must read liberal and conservative articles in a critical way and judge for themselves. Its important to filter out any opinions for which data is not offered.

On the video I saw, nobody was verbally assaulted.

I read the article, twice.

So you decide now who feels verbally assaulted?
 
So you decide now who feels verbally assaulted?

No, did the judge say he felt verbally assaulted? Did I miss that in the article? Are you the one who decides? You are claiming verbal assault, not me.
 
A judges talk at a law school being disrupted is a small issue. Sorry. A mob's attempt to kill the Vice President is a big issue.

It's so small you've done t all this time debating it. So small the fat cow and the students made a scene. The people on jan 6 face facing consequences. Are the fat ciw and the students facing any consequences. I think if you cant handle listening to people you disagree with so much so that you have to disrupt things, you should be drummed out if kaw school.
 
No, did the judge say he felt verbally assaulted? Did I miss that in the article? Are you the one who decides? You are claiming verbal assault, not me.

Thats not the question. You decided that no one felt verbally assaulted because of what you saw on a video. So if he didn't say he felt verbally assaulted then he didn't feel verbally assaulted? People who don't look for reasons to be victims dont usually claim to be victims. Claiming victimhood is leftism 101
 
Back
Top