Look! Another witch!

I have no reason. What's your reason for hiding behind the keyboard, troll?

If you want to force some kind of face-to-face meeting, I guarantee you it will not work out the way you think it will.

How about you stick to actual debate topics instead of trying to troll out personal things on an anonymous platform, Reek?
 
If you want to force some kind of face-to-face meeting, I guarantee you it will not work out the way you think it will.

How about you stick to actual debate topics instead of trying to troll out personal things on an anonymous platform, Reek?

A tough guy, huh? All that talk while hiding like a little bitch.
 
If you want to force some kind of face-to-face meeting, I guarantee you it will not work out the way you think it will.

How about you stick to actual debate topics instead of trying to troll out personal things on an anonymous platform, Reek?

Have you figured out why CFM is among the most on IGNORE yet?
 
Here is the law Butina is being charged with violating, and it appears to be nonsense.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/951

{...
18 U.S. Code § 951 - Agents of foreign governments
US Code

(a) Whoever, other than a diplomatic or consular officer or attaché, acts in the United States as an agent of a foreign government without prior notification to the Attorney General if required in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(b) The Attorney General shall promulgate rules and regulations establishing requirements for notification.
(c) The Attorney General shall, upon receipt, promptly transmit one copy of each notification statement filed under this section to the Secretary of State for such comment and use as the Secretary of State may determine to be appropriate from the point of view of the foreign relations of the United States. Failure of the Attorney General to do so shall not be a bar to prosecution under this section.
(d) For purposes of this section, the term “agent of a foreign government” means an individual who agrees to operate within the United States subject to the direction or control of a foreign government or official, except that such term does not include—
(1) a duly accredited diplomatic or consular officer of a foreign government, who is so recognized by the Department of State;
(2) any officially and publicly acknowledged and sponsored official or representative of a foreign government;
(3) any officially and publicly acknowledged and sponsored member of the staff of, or employee of, an officer, official, or representative described in paragraph (1) or (2), who is not a United States citizen; or
(4) any person engaged in a legal commercial transaction.
(e) Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(4), any person engaged in a legal commercial transaction shall be considered to be an agent of a foreign government for purposes of this section if—
(1) such person agrees to operate within the United States subject to the direction or control of a foreign government or official; and
(2) such person—
(A) is an agent of Cuba or any other country that the President determines (and so reports to the Congress) poses a threat to the national security interest of the United States for purposes of this section, unless the Attorney General, after consultation with the Secretary of State, determines and so reports to the Congress that the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States require that the provisions of this section do not apply in specific circumstances to agents of such country; or
(B) has been convicted of, or has entered a plea of nolo contendere with respect to, any offense under section 792 through 799, 831, or 2381 of this title or under section 11 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, except that the provisions of this subsection shall not apply to a person described in this clause for a period of more than five years beginning on the date of the conviction or the date of entry of the plea of nolo contendere, as the case may be.
...}


There is no federal jurisdiction for such a statute, and it clearly violates basic individual rights.
It essentially makes anyone acting patriotic towards their country as being a spy.
There can be no law infringing on the freedom of anyone unless they are causing illegal harm to others, such as paying bribes, offering illegal campaign contributions, quid pro quo, etc.

Russia has government investment in business, so all Russian business are then claimed to be controlled by the Russian government, and all businessmen required to register.
Which clearly is absurd.
No one is going to do that, and no one should ever have to as long as they are not making campaign contributions, etc.
 
Back
Top