LOL MAX BOOT, Obama attack dog, "would take back O in a nanosecond" "lost golden age

Yeah mang, Ivanka's shit is exempt. Easy to search. Baby girl's shit slides right on in, you know how they do.

Magic underwear tolerance included.

giphy.gif
 
Many Trump voters are non-interventionists -including Trump himself
( although the IC tries to get us involved in Syria etc)
'

I do not believe TRUMP has any 'core' beliefs. Period. Non-interventionist? Didn't he was to INVADE Venezuela a couple of weeks ago? (WE found out a couple of weeks ago, he had to be talked down out of the rafters sometime in 2017).
 
Many Trump voters are non-interventionists -including Trump himself
( although the IC tries to get us involved in Syria etc)

Horseshit.

90 percent of Trump voters - at least - are the exact same people who were cheering for George Dumbya Bush to invade Iraq.

Trump himself has not met a military intervention or war he didn't like. He supported invading Iraq, he supported military intervention in Libya, he escalated our military intervention in Syria and Afghanistan, and he fantasizes about invading Venezuela.
 
Good thing neither you or Boot made a difference in the election then. Idiots like you would have Hillary selecting the next two or three supreme court justices. Then idiots like you and Boot would be whining about that instead of how mean Trump is.

STFU, seriously.

How many times can you FIT 'idiots' into a POST? Well at least ONE.
 
'

I do not believe TRUMP has any 'core' beliefs. Period. Non-interventionist? Didn't he was to INVADE Venezuela a couple of weeks ago? (WE found out a couple of weeks ago, he had to be talked down out of the rafters sometime in 2017).

he's specifically mentioned no more middle east regime changes like Libya and Iraq.
You can infer he's not going into Ukraine - while at the same time boosting NATO contributions and spending
 
LOOK AT MY TITLE and NARRATIVE. DID I EVER SAY HE WAS A TRUMP FAN?? I didn't EVEN mention TRUMP.

It's called reading comprehension!

You're questioning my Reading comprehension when I quoted from the article you posted? Did you not read your article? Do you know the source of the article you posted?
 
Just another example of why rawstory is so full of sh*t.

Boot, who is now a columnist for the Washington Post, was never a Trump fan, but he did write a column the day after the election in which he argued that a Trump presidency “might not be so bad” and encouraged optimism.


Boot was a #nevertrumper all the way. I followed him on Twitter because he was a Rubio backer and I supported Rubio. Boot hates Trump and basically every tweet was anti-Trump.


This false spin isn't something you would catch unless you knew the facts. Yet rawstory does it in most articles they write. And people on this board continue posting their articles.


The article says he "was never a Trump fan" and you say that is false spin he was a nevertrumper all the way. What the fuck are you talking about? This must be the TDS we have heard so much about.
 
The article says he "was never a Trump fan" and you say that is false spin he was a nevertrumper all the way. What the fuck are you talking about? This must be the TDS we have heard so much about.

What the Fvck am I talking about? I'm talking about exactly what I wrote. Rawstory tries to spin everything they do and they aren't being honest about Boot.

Why do you get so worked up defending rawstory?
 
What the Fvck am I talking about? I'm talking about exactly what I wrote. Rawstory tries to spin everything they do and they aren't being honest about Boot.

Why do you get so worked up defending rawstory?


Are you drunk? They said he "was never a Trump fan." How are they being dishonest?

I don't care about Raw Story. Your attempts at bootlicking are incoherent.
 
Are you drunk? They said he "was never a Trump fan." How are they being dishonest?

I don't care about Raw Story. Your attempts at bootlicking are incoherent.

My comment was 100% about rawstory. Who or what am I bootlicking. Looks to me like you've gone from libertarian to "bootlicking" rawstory.
 
Republicans can worship whomever they wish.

The demigod Republicans have chosen to worship is President Ronald Wilson Reagan.

And Reagan's standard is: "Are you better off ..."?

By this Republican demigod's standard, President Obama was a superior president.

When Senator Obama was inaugurated president, the U.S. under Bush / Cheney / Paulson was losing about 800K private sector jobs per month.

Their $700 $Billion $TARP wasn't intended to solve the massive economic problems of their administration. $TARP was merely designed to prevent the U.S. economy from collapsing until they could get out of town; dropping their economic hot potato into Obama's lap.
“... Reince Priebus, the Republican National Chairman today said that 300K jobs ... aught to be expected every month ... and just a historical perspective:
- during the 8 years of President Bush (younger) there were 2.1 million net jobs created in the United States. Of the 2.1 million, 1.8 million of them were in the public sector ... that means there were 300,000 jobs in the private sector in 8 months, in 8 years rather, net ...
more jobs have been created in the United States in the last 4 years than in Europe, Japan, all the industrialized modern world combined. ...
70 years since WWII. 36 years of Republican presidents, 34 years of Democratic presidents. In those 70 years, there were 36.7 million jobs created under Republican presidents ... a little over half the time. In 34 years there were 63.7 million created by Democrats. That's 29 million more. You know, perhaps it's an accident once, or twice or what. But I mean at some point the Democrats ought to be comfort in the fact that they have been better the economy and job creation than have been the opposition.
...
It's 15 years since we've had 10 consecutive months of over 200,000 [job growth]. Just 15 years ago there was a fella from Arkansas ... there were more jobs created in Bill Clinton's 8 years than there were in Ronald Reagan's 8 years, and the 12 years of both Bush's combined. I mean 6 million more jobs created in those 8 years, ... policy does kick in, & is reflected in the results.” Mark Shields
Complain to me all you wish. It's Reagan's standard, not mine. But yes. By several quantifiable criteria the U.S. nation and People are substantially better off, after 8 years of the Obama administration.
 
I answered it in the post you responded to. Here's the article they're referencing. But to fully comprehend it you have to know his work prior and after.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/foreig...sidency-might-not-be-as-awful-as-we-fear/amp/

You did not answer it. You said Boot was a nevertrumper which contradicted nothing in their article.

Again, the article said he was never a Trump fan. He is an Ex-Republican and was a harsh critic of Obama. Where is the "example of why rawstory is so full of sh*t" and the "false spin?"
 
Last edited:
You did not answer it. You said Boot was a nevertrumper which contradicted nothing in their article.

Again, the article said he was never a Trump fan. He is an Ex-Republican and was a harsh critic of Obama. Where is the "example of why rawstory is so full of sh*t" and the "false spin?"

If you don't know and follow Max Boot then you don't understand the spin. Read the guys work
 
Good thing neither you or Boot made a difference in the election then. Idiots like you would have Hillary selecting the next two or three supreme court justices. Then idiots like you and Boot would be whining about that instead of how mean Trump is.

STFU, seriously.

Idiots like me would have someone serious/honest as our nominee/president, like Cruz/Rubio/Paul/Walker/Kasich.
 
Back
Top